Effect of renin–angiotensin system blockade on graft survival and cardiovascular disease in kidney transplant recipients: retrospective multicenter study in Japan

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-378
Author(s):  
Akihiro Tsuchimoto ◽  
◽  
Kosuke Masutani ◽  
Kenji Ueki ◽  
Kaneyasu Nakagawa ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 17-18
Author(s):  
Emily Bobrzynski ◽  
Emily Fargo ◽  
Sandra Sauereisen ◽  
Gretchen Shelesky ◽  
Amy Haugh

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-249
Author(s):  
Monika Cahova ◽  
Martin Kveton ◽  
Vojtech Petr ◽  
David Funda ◽  
Helena Dankova ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Preclinical studies suggested that pharmacological inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) by ACE inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) may increase local angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (<i>ACE2</i>) expression. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this study, we evaluated the effect of ACEi or ARB treatment on expression of <i>ACE2</i>, <i>ACE</i>, and <i>AGTR1</i> in 3-month protocol kidney allograft biopsies of stable patients using RT-qPCR (<i>n</i> = 48). Protein ACE2 expression was assessed using immunohistochemistry from paraffin sections. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The therapy with RAAS blockers was not associated with increased <i>ACE2, ACE</i>, or <i>ATGR1</i> expression in kidney allografts and also ACE2 protein immunohistochemistry did not reveal differences among groups. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> ACEis or ARBs in kidney transplant recipients do not affect local ACE2 expression. This observation supports long-term RAAS treatment in kidney transplant recipients, despite acute complications such as COVID-19 where ACE2 serves as the entry protein for infection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3063
Author(s):  
Napat Leeaphorn ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Pradeep Vaitla ◽  
Panupong Hansrivijit ◽  
Caroline C. Jadlowiec ◽  
...  

Background: Lower patient survival has been observed in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients who go on to receive a kidney transplant. This study aimed to assess the post-transplant outcomes of SCD kidney transplant recipients in the contemporary era. Methods: We used the OPTN/UNOS database to identify first-time kidney transplant recipients from 2010 through 2019. We compared patient and allograft survival between recipients with SCD (n = 105) vs. all other diagnoses (non-SCD, n = 146,325) as the reported cause of end-stage kidney disease. We examined whether post-transplant outcomes improved among SCD in the recent era (2010–2019), compared to the early era (2000–2009). Results: After adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics, SCD was significantly associated with lower patient survival (HR 2.87; 95% CI 1.75–4.68) and death-censored graft survival (HR 1.98; 95% CI 1.30–3.01), compared to non-SCD recipients. The lower patient survival and death-censored graft survival in SCD recipients were consistently observed in comparison to outcomes of recipients with diabetes, glomerular disease, and hypertension as the cause of end-stage kidney disease. There was no significant difference in death censored graft survival (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.51–1.73, p = 0.98) and patient survival (HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.50–1.74, p = 0.82) of SCD recipients in the recent versus early era. Conclusions: Patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients were worse than recipients with other diagnoses. Overall SCD patient and allograft outcomes in the recent era did not improve from the early era. The findings of our study should not discourage kidney transplantation for ESKD patients with SCD due to a known survival benefit of transplantation compared with remaining on dialysis. Urgent future studies are needed to identify strategies to improve patient and allograft survival in SCD kidney recipients. In addition, it may be reasonable to assign risk adjustment for SCD patients.


2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. S19
Author(s):  
D.S. Rodriguez ◽  
E. Jankowska-Gan ◽  
L.D. Haynes ◽  
G. Leverson ◽  
D. Heisey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document