Foraging under the risk of predation in desert grassland whiptail lizards (Aspidoscelis uniparens)

2007 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. Eifler ◽  
Maria A. Eifler ◽  
Bethany R. Harris
1979 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 1487-1499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph C. Mitchell

Four species of whiptail lizards, two bisexual (Cnemidophorus inornatus and C. tigris) and two unisexual (C. sonorae and C. uniparens), were examined for ecological differences during the 1975 activity season in the desert–grassland of southeastern Arizona.Density estimates indicate the decreasing order of abundance was C. uniparens, C. inornatus, C. tigris, and C. sonorae. Daily activity was generally bimodal. Most active lizards were encountered away from plant cover and utilization of shade patches differed among species, Termites, coleopterans, orthopterans, and various larvae dominated whiptail diets and a wide variety of other prey types were consumed in small quantities. Monthly variations of arthropod biomass and prey diversities between years are presented and discussed.Niche breadths and two measures of niche overlap were calculated and compared for temporal, spatial, and trophic niche components for syntopic species pairs. Ecological differences between bisexual and unisexual species were determined to be minimal.Comparisons of data and niche overlaps indicate the order of importance in separating southeastern Arizona whiptail niches is macrohabitat, microhabitat, time, and food. However, due to higher than average niche overlap and noted similarities among these four species, it is concluded that southeastern Arizona whiptails form a guild of similar lizards.


2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 1829-1838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean B Menke

I investigated the distribution and abundance of lizard species (Aspidoscelis inornatus, Aspidoscelis tesselatus, Aspidoscelis tigris, Aspidoscelis uniparens, Cophosaurus texanus, Crotaphytus collaris, Eumeces obsoletus, Gambelia wislizenii, Holbrookia maculata, Phrynosoma cornutum, Sceloporus magister, and Uta stansburiana) across a desert grassland – creosote bush (Larrea tridentata) ecotone in Dona Ana County, New Mexico. The ecotonal area in the Jornada del Muerto basin has increased dramatically in the past 150 years because of the rapid spread of creosote bush. I asked four related questions: how large and where is the ecotone based on vegetative structure, and do lizard abundance and diversity change across the ecotone? Vegetation data were analyzed using discriminate function analysis to determine the extent of the ecotone. Changes in lizard abundance across the ecotone were analyzed by analysis of variance. During two summers, 677 individual lizards of 9 genera and 12 species were captured. Lizard abundance increased with increasing distance from the ecotone and was similar in grassland and creosote bush habitat. Grasslands had higher species richness than both the creosote bush and ecotone habitats. Grassland sites had greater habitat heterogeneity than did creosote bush sites. No ecotone specialist species were detected, and all common lizard species could be found in each habitat. Three potential explanations for decreased abundance in the ecotone are presented: (1) increased risk of predation, (2) decreased prey abundance, and (3) lack of species-specific microhabitat requisites.


Author(s):  
Xavier Lambin

The dependency of mustelid demographic rates on prey abundance has the potential to cause a strong coupling between predator-prey populations. Data on mustelid dynamics show that such strong reciprocal interactions only materialise in some restricted conditions. Bite-size mustelid predators searching for scarce, depleted prey expose themselves to increased risk of predation by larger predators of small mammal that are themselves searching for similar prey species. As voles or muskrats become scarcer, weasels and mink searching for prey over larger areas become increasingly exposed to intra-guild predation, unless they operate in a habitat refuge such as the sub-nivean space. Where larger predators are sufficiently abundant or exert year-round predation pressure on small mustelids, their impact on mustelids may impose biological barrier to dispersal that are sufficient to weaken the coupling between small mustelids and their rodent prey, and thus impose a degree of top down limitation on mustelids.


1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Saint Girons

AbstractIf one accepts that the number of times that vipers are observed in the field in any given season is an indirect measure of the overall risk of predation run by such diurnal predators hunting by vision, the results obtained in this study show that risk of predation is particularly high in males during the period of mating and in females when pregnant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document