On the collagen criss-cross angles in the annuli fibrosi of lumbar spine finite element models

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérôme Noailly ◽  
Josep A. Planell ◽  
Damien Lacroix
2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 563-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Galbusera ◽  
Hendrik Schmidt ◽  
Cornelia Neidlinger-Wilke ◽  
Andreas Gottschalk ◽  
Hans-Joachim Wilke

2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Ye ◽  
Derek A. Jones ◽  
James P. Gaewsky ◽  
Bharath Koya ◽  
Kyle P. McNamara ◽  
...  

Abstract The goals of this study are to compare the lumbar spine response variance between the hybrid III, test device for human occupant restraint (THOR), and global human body models consortium simplified 50th percentile (GHBMC M50-OS) finite element models and evaluate the sensitivity of lumbar spine injury metrics to multidirectional acceleration pulses for spaceflight landing conditions. The hybrid III, THOR, and GHBMC models were positioned in a baseline posture within a generic seat with side guards and a five-point restraint system. Thirteen boundary conditions, which were categorized as loading condition variables and environmental variables, were included in the parametric study using a Latin hypercube design of experiments. Each of the three models underwent 455 simulations for a total of 1365 simulations. The hybrid III and THOR models exhibited similar lumbar compression forces. The average lumbar compression force was 45% higher for hybrid III (2.2 ± 1.5 kN) and 51% higher for THOR (2.0 ± 1.6 kN) compared to GHBMC (1.3 ± 0.9 kN). Compared to hybrid III, THOR sustained an average 64% higher lumbar flexion moment and an average 436% higher lumbar extension moment. The GHBMC model sustained much lower bending moments compared to hybrid III and THOR. Regressions revealed that lumbar spine responses were more sensitive to loading condition variables than environmental variables across all models. This study quantified the intermodel lumbar spine response variations and sensitivity between hybrid III, THOR, and GHBMC. Results improve the understanding of lumbar spine response in spaceflight landings.


2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Mills ◽  
Nesrin Sarigul-Klijn

Mathematical models of the human spine can be used to investigate spinal biomechanics without the difficulties, limitations, and ethical concerns associated with physical experimentation. Validation of such models is necessary to ensure that the modeled system behavior accurately represents the physics of the actual system. The goal of this work was to validate a medical image-based nonlinear lumbosacral spine finite element model of a healthy 20-yr-old female subject under physiological moments. Range of motion (ROM), facet joint forces (FJF), and intradiscal pressure (IDP) were compared with experimental values and validated finite element models from the literature. The finite element model presented in this work was in good agreement with published experimental studies and finite element models under pure moments. For applied moments of 7.5 N·m, the ROM in flexion–extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending were 39 deg, 16 deg, and 28 deg, respectively. Excellent agreement was observed between the finite element model and experimental data for IDP under pure compressive loading. The predicted FJFs were lower than those of the experimental results and validated finite element models for extension and torsion, likely due to the nondegenerate properties chosen for the intervertebral disks and morphology of the young female spine. This work is the first to validate a computational lumbar spine model of a young female subject. This model will serve as a valuable tool for predicting orthopedic spinal injuries, studying the effect of intervertebral disk replacements using advanced biomaterials, and investigating soft tissue degeneration.


2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 444-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Finley ◽  
Darrel S. Brodke ◽  
Nicholas T. Spina ◽  
Christine A. DeDen ◽  
Benjamin J. Ellis

Author(s):  
Arjan C. Y. Loenen ◽  
Jérôme Noailly ◽  
Keita Ito ◽  
Paul C. Willems ◽  
Jacobus J. Arts ◽  
...  

Introduction: 3D printed trussed titanium interbody cages may deliver bone stimulating mechanobiological strains to cells attached at their surface. The exact size and distribution of these strains may depend on patient-specific factors, but the influence of these factors remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to determine patient-specific variations in local strain patterns on the surface of a trussed titanium interbody fusion cage.Materials and Methods: Four patients eligible for spinal fusion surgery with the same cage size were selected from a larger database. For these cases, patient-specific finite element models of the lumbar spine including the same trussed titanium cage were made. Functional dynamics of the non-operated lumbar spinal segments, as well as local cage strains and caudal endplate stresses at the operated segment, were evaluated under physiological extension/flexion movement of the lumbar spine.Results: All patient-specific models revealed physiologically realistic functional dynamics of the operated spine. In all patients, approximately 30% of the total cage surface experienced strain values relevant for preserving bone homeostasis and stimulating bone formation. Mean caudal endplate contact pressures varied up to 10 MPa. Both surface strains and endplate contact pressures varied more between loading conditions than between patients.Conclusions: This study demonstrates the applicability of patient-specific finite element models to quantify the impact of patient-specific factors such as bone density, degenerative state of the spine, and spinal curvature on interbody cage loading. In the future, the same framework might be further developed in order to establish a pipeline for interbody cage design optimizations.


2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (8) ◽  
pp. 1757-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dreischarf ◽  
T. Zander ◽  
A. Shirazi-Adl ◽  
C.M. Puttlitz ◽  
C.J. Adam ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document