Total-coloring of Sparse Graphs with Maximum Degree 6

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 738-746
Author(s):  
Yu-lin Chang ◽  
Fei Jing ◽  
Guang-hui Wang ◽  
Ji-chang Wu
2019 ◽  
Vol 342 (5) ◽  
pp. 1392-1402
Author(s):  
Jie Hu ◽  
Guanghui Wang ◽  
Jianliang Wu ◽  
Donglei Yang ◽  
Xiaowei Yu

Algorithms ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 161 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Vignesh ◽  
J. Geetha ◽  
K. Somasundaram

A total coloring of a graph G is an assignment of colors to the elements of the graph G such that no two adjacent or incident elements receive the same color. The total chromatic number of a graph G, denoted by χ ′ ′ ( G ) , is the minimum number of colors that suffice in a total coloring. Behzad and Vizing conjectured that for any graph G, Δ ( G ) + 1 ≤ χ ′ ′ ( G ) ≤ Δ ( G ) + 2 , where Δ ( G ) is the maximum degree of G. In this paper, we prove the total coloring conjecture for certain classes of graphs of deleted lexicographic product, line graph and double graph.


Author(s):  
J. Geetha ◽  
K. Somasundaram ◽  
Hung-Lin Fu

The total chromatic number [Formula: see text] is the least number of colors needed to color the vertices and edges of a graph [Formula: see text] such that no incident or adjacent elements (vertices or edges) receive the same color. Behzad and Vizing proposed a well-known total coloring conjecture (TCC): [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the maximum degree of [Formula: see text]. For the powers of cycles, Campos and de Mello proposed the following conjecture: Let [Formula: see text] denote the graphs of powers of cycles of order [Formula: see text] and length [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. Then, [Formula: see text] In this paper, we prove the Campos and de Mello’s conjecture for some classes of powers of cycles. Also, we prove the TCC for complement of powers of cycles.


2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
VAN H. VU

Suppose that G is a graph with maximum degree d(G) such that, for every vertex v in G, the neighbourhood of v contains at most d(G)2/f (f > 1) edges. We show that the list chromatic number of G is at most Kd(G)/log f, for some positive constant K. This result is sharp up to the multiplicative constant K and strengthens previous results by Kim [9], Johansson [7], Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov [3], and the present author [18]. This also motivates several interesting questions.As an application, we derive several upper bounds for the strong (list) chromatic index of a graph, under various assumptions. These bounds extend earlier results by Faudree, Gyárfás, Schelp and Tuza [6] and Mahdian [13] and determine, up to a constant factor, the strong (list) chromatic index of a random graph. Another application is an extension of a result of Kostochka and Steibitz [10] concerning the structure of list critical graphs.


2010 ◽  
Vol 110 (20) ◽  
pp. 913-916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mickael Montassier ◽  
André Raspaud ◽  
Xuding Zhu
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 518 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huijuan Wang ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Jianliang Wu ◽  
Guizhen Liu

10.37236/4313 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Pineda-Villavicencio ◽  
David R. Wood

The degree-diameter problem asks for the maximum number of vertices in a graph with maximum degree $\Delta$ and diameter $k$. For fixed $k$, the answer is $\Theta(\Delta^k)$. We consider the degree-diameter problem for particular classes of sparse graphs, and establish the following results. For graphs of bounded average degree the answer is $\Theta(\Delta^{k-1})$, and for graphs of bounded arboricity the answer is $\Theta(\Delta^{\lfloor k/2\rfloor})$, in both cases for fixed $k$. For graphs of given treewidth, we determine the maximum number of vertices up to a constant factor. Other precise bounds are given for graphs embeddable on a given surface and apex-minor-free graphs.


1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Han Kim

Let G be a graph with maximum degree Δ(G). In this paper we prove that if the girth g(G) of G is greater than 4 then its chromatic number, χ(G), satisfieswhere o(l) goes to zero as Δ(G) goes to infinity. (Our logarithms are base e.) More generally, we prove the same bound for the list-chromatic (or choice) number:provided g(G) < 4.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document