scholarly journals Enhanced solar radiation pressure model for GPS satellites considering various physical effects

GPS Solutions ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbing Duan ◽  
Urs Hugentobler

AbstractSolar radiation pressure (SRP) is the dominant non-gravitational perturbation for GPS satellites. In the IGS (International GNSS Service), this perturbation is modeled differently by individual analysis centers (ACs). The two most widely used methods are the Empirical CODE orbit Model (ECOM, ECOM2) and the JPL GSPM model. When using ECOM models, a box-wing model or other a priori models, as well as stochastic pulses at noon or midnight, are optionally adopted by some ACs to compensate for the deficiencies of the ECOM or ECOM2 model. However, both box-wing and GSPM parameters were published many years ago. There could be an aging effect going with time. Also, optical properties and GSPM parameters of GPS Block IIF satellites are currently not yet published. In this contribution, we first determine Block-specific optical parameters of GPS satellites using GPS code and phase measurements of 6 years. Various physical effects, such as yaw bias, radiator emission in the satellite body-fixed − X and Y directions and the thermal radiation of solar panels, are considered as additional constant parameters in the optical parameter adjustment. With all the adjusted parameters, we form an enhanced box-wing model adding all the modeled physical effects. In addition, we determine Block-specific GSPM parameters by using the same GPS measurements. The enhanced box-wing model and the GSPM model are then taken as a priori model and are jointly used with ECOM and ECOM2 model, respectively. We find that the enhanced box-wing model performs similarly to the GSPM model outside eclipse seasons. RMSs of all the ECOM and ECOM2 parameters are reduced by 30% compared to results without the a priori model. Orbit misclosures and orbit predictions are improved by combining the enhanced box-wing model with ECOM and ECOM2 models. In particular, the improvement in orbit misclosures for the eclipsing Block IIR and IIF satellites, as well as the non-eclipsing IIA satellites, is about 25%, 10% and 10%, respectively, for the ECOM model. Therefore, the enhanced box-wing model is recommended as an a priori model in GPS satellite orbit determination.

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 3388
Author(s):  
Longjiang Tang ◽  
Jungang Wang ◽  
Huizhong Zhu ◽  
Maorong Ge ◽  
Aigong Xu ◽  
...  

For Global Positioning System (GPS) precise orbit determination (POD), the solar radiation pressure (SRP) is the dominant nongravitational perturbation force. Among the current SRP models, the ECOM and box-wing models are widely used in the International GNSS Service (IGS) community. However, the performance of different models varies over different GPS satellites. In this study, we investigate the performances of different SRP models, including the box-wing and adjustable box-wing as a priori models, and ECOM1 and ECOM2 as parameterization models, in the GPS POD solution from 2017 to 2019. Moreover, we pay special attention to the handling of the shadow factor in the SRP modeling for eclipsing satellites, which is critical to achieve high-precision POD solutions but has not yet been fully investigated. We demonstrate that, as an a priori SRP model, the adjustable box-wing has better performance than the box-wing model by up to 5 mm in the orbit day boundary discontinuity (DBD) statistics, with the largest improvement observed on the BLOCK IIR satellites using the ECOM1 as a parameterization SRP model. The box-wing model shows an insignificant orbit improvement serving as the a priori SRP model. For the eclipsing satellites, the three-dimensional (3D) root mean square (RMS) values of orbit DBD are improved when the shadow factor is applied only in the D direction (pointing toward to Sun) than that in the three directions (D, Y, and B) in the satellite frame. Different SRP models have comparable performance in terms of the Earth rotation parameter (ERP) agreement with the IERS EOP 14C04 product, whereas the magnitude of the length of day (LoD) annual signal is reduced when the shadow factor is applied in the D direction than in the three directions. This study clarifies how the shadow factor should be applied in the GPS POD solution and demonstrates that the a priori adjustable box-wing model combined with ECOM1 is more suitable for high-precision GPS POD solutions, which is useful for the further GNSS data analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 55 ◽  
pp. 33-45
Author(s):  
Xiao Chang ◽  
Benjamin Männel ◽  
Harald Schuh

Abstract. Among the different non-conservative forces acting on GPS satellites, solar radiation pressure (SRP) has the greatest influence and inappropriate modeling of it can introduce an acceleration with the order of 1 × 10−7 m s−2. There are a variety of empirical, analytical, and hybrid empirical-physical models to describe the SRP effect. Among them, the empirical model developed at the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) and analytical models based on a box-wing prototype, namely box-shape bus with solar panels, are widely used in the International GNSS Service (IGS) community. To investigate the effects of different a priori SRP models on top of empirical parameterization, two sets of parameters based on the Empirical CODE Orbit Model (ECOM) and two a priori models including the analytical box-wing model and the empirical GPS Solar Pressure Model (GSPM) are tested for the different GPS satellites. Orbit comparison of different SRP scenarios shows that: (1) the two parameterizations of ECOM perform differently for Block IIA and IIR/IIR-M satellites but lead to fewer differences for Block IIF satellites in terms of orbit difference pattern. The 3D RMS of orbit difference of two parameterizations are 25, 30 and 21 mm for each block type. (2) Adoption of a priori model or change of the ECOM parameterization mainly lead to orbit differences varying with both elevation of the Sun w.r.t. the orbit plane and the satellites' argument of latitude w.r.t. the noon point, which is supposed to be related to the special geometry and attitude of every block type. These differences are especially obvious in radial direction. Analysis of estimated parameters of ECOM indicates that (3) the GSPM.04 performs better than box-wing model to describe the main constant solar radiation. It is found (4) that the asymmetry of estimated ECOM parameters in B direction (i.e., the direction completing the orthogonal system with D direction and satellite's solar panel axes), observed for three Block IIR satellites, causes corresponding asymmetrical orbit differences in radial direction when reduced ECOM parameters are used. This does not apply to the extended ECOM parameterization tested in this study, which indicates the insufficiency of reduced ECOM to parameterize asymmetrical satellites.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbing Duan ◽  
Urs Hugentobler ◽  
Inga Selmke

<p>Within the IGS (International GNSS Service), precise orbit and clock products of GPS and GLONASS satellites as well as Earth rotation parameters (ERPs) are routinely generated by individual analysis centers. As the dominant non-gravitational perturbation, solar radiation pressure (SRP) is modeled differently by different centers. Without surface properties, the empirical CODE orbit models (ECOM, ECOM2) are mostly used. We find that the ECOM models are not optimal for GLONASS satellites, especially during the eclipsing seasons. Also, the use of a conventional a priori box-wing (BW) model does not help much. By assessing the ECOM estimates we conclude that there are potential radiators on the –x surface of GLONASS satellites causing orbit perturbations in eclipse as well. Based on this finding, we firstly adjust optical properties of GLONASS satellites considering the potential radiator and thermal radiation effects. Then, we introduce all the adjusted parameters into a new a priori model and jointly use it together with the ECOM models. Results show that orbit misclosure between two consecutive arcs reduces by about 30 % for the ECOM model during the eclipsing seasons. In addition, the spurious pattern of the satellite laser ranging (SLR) residuals is greatly reduced. Also, we have repeated the same adjustment of optical properties for GPS satellites by using 6 years’ data (2014 - 2019). We evaluate GPS orbits, ERPs and geocenter products calculated with different SRP models (ECOM, ECOM+BW, ECOM2, ECOM2+BW, adjustable BW, GSPM) and present corresponding systematic errors of each product at harmonics of the GPS draconitic year.</p>


GPS Solutions ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Radosław Zajdel ◽  
Krzysztof Sośnica ◽  
Grzegorz Bury

Abstract The Global Navigational Satellite System (GNSS) technique is naturally sensitive to the geocenter motion, similar to all satellite techniques. However, the GNSS-based estimates of the geocenter used to contain more orbital artifacts than the geophysical signals, especially for the Z component of the geocenter coordinates. This contribution conveys a discussion on the impact of solar radiation pressure (SRP) modeling on the geocenter motion estimates. To that end, we process 3 years of GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo observations (2017–2019), collected by a globally distributed network of the ground stations. All possible individual system-specific solutions, as well as combinations of the available constellations, are tested in search of characteristic patterns in geocenter coordinates. We show that the addition of a priori information about the SRP-based forces acting on the satellites using a box-wing model mitigates a great majority of the spurious signals in the spectra of the geocenter coordinates. The amplitude of the 3 cpy (about 121 days) signal for GLONASS has been reduced by a factor of 8.5. Moreover, the amplitude of the spurious 7 cpy (about 52 days) signal has been reduced by a factor of 5.8 and 3.1 for Galileo and GPS, respectively. Conversely, the box-wing solutions indicate increased amplitudes of the annual variations in the geocenter signal. The latter reaches the level of 10–11 mm compared to 4.4 and 6.0 mm from the satellite laser ranging observations of LAGEOS satellites and the corresponding GNSS series applying extended empirical CODE orbit model (ECOM2), respectively. Despite the possible improvement in the GLONASS-based Z component of the geocenter coordinates, we show that some significant power can still be found at periods other than annual. The GPS- and Galileo-based estimates are less affected; thus, a combination of GPS and Galileo leads to the best geocenter estimates.


2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1113-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Rodriguez-Solano ◽  
U. Hugentobler ◽  
P. Steigenberger

GPS Solutions ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 50-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Springer ◽  
G. Beutler ◽  
M. Rothacher

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbing Duan ◽  
Urs Hugentobler ◽  
Inga Selmke ◽  
Stefan Marz

<p>A physical a priori box-wing solar radiation pressure (SRP) model is widely used by most analysis centers for Galileo and QZSS (Quasi-Zenith Satellite System) satellites, complemented by an ECOM or ECOM2 (Empirical CODE Orbit Model) model. For the other constellations, for instance GPS and GLONASS satellites, optical properties of satellite surfaces are not publicly available, especially for GPS Block IIF and GLONASS satellites. By fixing satellite surface areas and total mass to the values from some unpublished documents, we estimate satellite surface optical properties based on true GNSS measurements covering long time periods (typically this should be longer than a full beta angle time range to reduce correlations between parameters). Meanwhile, various physical effects are considered, such as yaw bias, radiator emission and thermal radiation of solar panels. We find that yaw bias of GPS Block IIA and IIR satellites does not dominate the Y-bias, it is likely that heat generated in the satellite is radiated from louvers or heat pipes on the Y side of the satellite. It is also noted that the ECOM Y0 estimates of both GPS and GLONASS satellites show clear anomaly during eclipse seasons. This indicates that the radiator emission is present when the satellite crosses shadows. Since satellite attitude during eclipse seasons could be different from the nominal yaw, potential radiator effect in the –X surface could be wrongly absorbed by the ECOM Y0 as well. By considering all the estimated parameters in an a priori model we observe clear improvement in satellite orbits, especially for GLONASS satellites. China’s Beidou-3 satellites are now providing PNT (positioning, navigation and timing) service globally. Satellite attitude, dimensions and total mass are publicly available. Also, the absorption optical properties of each satellite surface are given. With all this information, we estimate the other optical properties of Beidou satellites considering similar yaw bias, radiator and thermal radiation effects as those in GPS and GLONASS satellites.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qile Zhao ◽  
Guo Chen ◽  
Jing Guo ◽  
Jingnan Liu ◽  
Xianglin Liu

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinghan Chen ◽  
Maorong Ge ◽  
Harald Schuh

<p>Currently, with the rapid development of the third generation of BeiDou satellite system (BDS-3), the corresponding solar radiation pressure (SRP) forces should be well and soon modeled in order to enhance the performance of precise orbit determination (POD) and precise clock estimation (PCE) for high-precision applications. In this contribution, the BDS-3 post-processed and ultra-rapid PODs have been realized by fully exploiting data provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS). We firstly test the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) SRP model (ECOM1) and ECOM2 models and notice a large disagreement of overlapping orbits at the boundary of two adjacent days within an eclipse period. The reason for this could be that the ECOM2 model is over-parameterized or an extra periodic SRP term should be considered. Furthermore, our numerical analyses confirm that the cosinus terms must be excluded and the fourth- and sixth-order SRP sinus terms are significant in the Sun direction for the SRP model of BDS-3 satellites. Therefore, a new SRP model is developed herein to improve BDS-3 orbits, especially for eclipse season. Using the new SRP model, the large fluctuations of 20 cm can be reduced to below 10 cm for the radial-track component of overlapping orbits over eclipse seasons and SLR residuals are improved by a factor of 2 compared to that of ECOM1 and ECOM2. For the predicted orbits, the improvement due to the new SRP model is also demonstrated and the mean offsets of overlapping orbit differences over the eclipse periods can be reduced from -9.3 cm, -18.9 cm, and 39.9 cm to -5.5 cm, 8.3 cm, and 12.7 cm in the radial, cross, and along directions, respectively.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document