scholarly journals Examining the response programming function of the Quiet Eye: Do tougher shots need a quieter eye?

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosanna Walters-Symons ◽  
Mark Wilson ◽  
Andre Klostermann ◽  
Samuel Vine
2012 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1005-1015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee J. Moore ◽  
Samuel J. Vine ◽  
Andrew Cooke ◽  
Christopher Ring ◽  
Mark R. Wilson

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Meaghan C. Sullivan

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] The quiet eye (QE) represents the time needed to cognitively process information being fixated or tracked and to focus attention on the demands of the task (Vickers, 2009). Research indicates that an optimal combination of QE, attentional control, and gaze behavior is linked with superior skill execution (Harle and Vickers, 2001), and that the successful integration of these attentional behaviors may also combat the negative effects that anxiety can have on performance (e.g., Vine and Wilson, 2011). To advance the research on QE training in pressurized interceptive timing tasks (Vickers, 2016), this mixed-method study explored how QE training impacted the hitting performances of Division I baseball players during a pressure situation. The results showed that, despite experiencing more overall anxiety, the QE group maintained performance under pressure. A main effect for group also approached significance, with the QE group nearly outperforming the control group. However, this difference was not statistically significant. Regardless, analyses of the participants' written feedback indicated that the QE group reported greater task-focus, less distractibility, improved pitch perception, and reduced muscle tension. Taken together, these findings provide strong support for implementing QE training in interceptive timing tasks, particularly as it relates to preserving performance under pressure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-64
Author(s):  
Yuuki Mizusaki ◽  
Sachi Ikudome ◽  
Yasumitsu Ishii ◽  
Satoshi Unenaka ◽  
Taishi Funo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek T.Y. Mann ◽  
A. Mark Williams ◽  
Paul Ward ◽  
Christopher M. Janelle

Research focusing on perceptual-cognitive skill in sport is abundant. However, the existing qualitative syntheses of this research lack the quantitative detail necessary to determine the magnitude of differences between groups of varying levels of skills, thereby limiting the theoretical and practical contribution of this body of literature. We present a meta-analytic review focusing on perceptual-cognitive skill in sport (N = 42 studies, 388 effect sizes) with the primary aim of quantifying expertise differences. Effects were calculated for a variety of dependent measures (i.e., response accuracy, response time, number of visual fixations, visual fixation duration, and quiet eye period) using point-biserial correlation. Results indicated that experts are better than nonexperts in picking up perceptual cues, as revealed by measures of response accuracy and response time. Systematic differences in visual search behaviors were also observed, with experts using fewer fixations of longer duration, including prolonged quiet eye periods, compared with nonexperts. Several factors (e.g., sport type, research paradigm employed, and stimulus presentation modality) significantly moderated the relationship between level of expertise and perceptual-cognitive skill. Practical and theoretical implications are presented and suggestions for empirical work are provided.


2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 318
Author(s):  
John Gierula ◽  
Judith Lowry ◽  
Maria F. Paton ◽  
Rowenna Byrom ◽  
Aaron Koshy ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document