Growth, yield and economic evaluation of early mint technology under poplar based silvi-medicinal system in the foothills of Himalaya

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manendra Singh ◽  
Virendra Singh ◽  
Ajit Kumar ◽  
Salil K. Tewari ◽  
V. K. Sah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Growth Yield

scholarly journals GROWTH, YIELD AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF AN EUCALYPT-SOYBEAN CONSORTIUM: EFFECT OF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN TREES WITHIN THE ROW1

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodolfo Alves Barbosa ◽  
Geraldo Gonçalves dos Reis ◽  
Maria das Graças Ferreira Reis ◽  
Helio Garcia leite ◽  
Carlos Henrique Rodrigues de Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Growth Yield ◽  
Basal Area ◽  
Agroforestry Systems ◽  
The Other ◽  
Growth And Yield ◽  
Agricultural Crop ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Soybean Yield ◽  
Individual Volume

ABSTRACT Agroforestry systems (AGF) design should benefit all components of the consortium. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the distance between plants within the row on growth and yield of trees and agricultural crop and on the economic viability of the consortium. The eucalypt was planted in 9.5 x 1.5 m, 9.5 x 2.0 m, 9.5 x 3.0 m and 9.5 x 40 m arrangements, in consortium with soybean. The tree diameter (dbh) and total height (Ht), and the leaf area index (LAI) were measured at 14, 38 and 51 months. Soybean yield was evaluated 24 months after planting eucalypt. An economic evaluation of the consortium was carried out for a planning horizon of seven years. The distance between trees within the row did not affect the tree height, however, larger distances promoted a higher dbh and individual volume. Higher values of basal area and yield were achieved in the 9.5 x 1.5 m arrangement. The LAI was smaller (1.43) in the 9.5 x 4.0 m arrangement, at 38 months, compared to the other arrangements (mean LAI = 1.66). Soybean had it's highest yield (2,317 kg ha-1) in the 9.5 x 4.0 m arrangement. In the economic evaluation, the wood produced in the two denser arrangements was destined for energy, with low market value, making these two arrangements unfeasible economically, although the tree component yield was the highest in the arrangement 9.5 x 1.5 m. The 9.5 x 4.0 m spatial arrangement was the most economically viable, considering the allocation of 40% of the wood for sawing, and the prices and costs assumed in this study. In this arrangement, the soybean yield was the highest, and the planting costs were the lowest when compared to the other arrangements.

Issues in the economic evaluation of community water fluoridation

1989 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 646-657 ◽  
Author(s):  
BA White ◽  
AA Antczak-Bouckoms ◽  
MC Weinstein
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Water Fluoridation ◽  
Community Water ◽  
Community Water Fluoridation

135: Economic Evaluation of Finasteride in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatment

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 35-36
Author(s):  
J. Curtis Nickel ◽  
Heather McDonald ◽  
Marg Hux ◽  
Marc Brisson ◽  
Lisa Bernard
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia ◽  
Prostatic Hyperplasia

Transformation of evaluation criteria of lands withdrawn from agricultural turnover due to radioactive contamination

2020 ◽  
pp. 23-27
Author(s):  
Olga Merzlova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Radioactive Contamination ◽  
Chernobyl Accident ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Contaminated Land ◽  
Degradation Processes ◽  
Agricultural Use ◽  
Land Clearance

One of the measures to eliminate the consequences of the Chernobyl accident was the exclusion of highly contaminated land from agricultural use. Due to the positive dynamics of the radiation situation, the issue of land return becomes relevant. However, in the period of exclusion of these lands the land clearance degradation processes were developing. The second part of the article is devoted to the issue of economic evaluation of the expediency of land return and the mutual coordination of the results of separate stages of complex ecological and economic evaluation. The research was carried out in Mogilev branch Institute of radiology (Republic of Belarus).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document