What does it mean to be a good teacher and clinical supervisor in medical education?

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terese Stenfors-Hayes ◽  
Håkan Hult ◽  
Lars Owe Dahlgren
2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Preeti Bajaj ◽  
Mrunal Suresh Patil ◽  
Balaji Almale

Medical teachers need training in pedagogic techniques in order to become better teachers. Despite the fact that our teaching techniques improve gradually over the years as we gain experience and also owing to continuous practice undertaken for different kinds of teaching learning situations; nevertheless educational technology has evolved ways and means for better development of teaching skills even at earlier stages by undertaking some methodical exercises, one of which is Microteaching. Microteaching, an innovative technique of teacher training, helps teachers to improve their teaching skills. It aims at development of competence in teaching skills through the practice of microteaching sessions1. In other words, it teaches teachers how to teach. This is especially important in cases of new faculty implying the budding teachers. Even an experienced teacher can benefit by this technique, particularly for learning some new skills1. The individual may be very sound in his/ her own subject but may not necessarily be a good teacher.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faye Gishen ◽  
Deborah Gill ◽  
Jane Dacre

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (12) ◽  
pp. 1016-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harri Hyppola ◽  
Esko Kumpusalo ◽  
Irma Virjo ◽  
Kari Mattila ◽  
Liisa Neittaanmaki ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-10
Author(s):  
Deborah Rutt ◽  
Kathyrn Mueller

Abstract Physicians who use the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) often serve as medical expert witnesses. In workers’ compensation cases, the expert may appear in front of a judge or hearing officer; in personal injury and other cases, the physician may testify by deposition or in court before a judge with or without a jury. This article discusses why medical expert witnesses are needed, what they do, and how they can help or hurt a case. Whether it is rendered by a judge or jury, the final opinions rely on laypersons’ understanding of medical issues. Medical expert testimony extracts from the intricacies of the medical literature those facts the trier of fact needs to understand; highlights the medical facts pertinent to decision making; and explains both these in terms that are understandable to a layperson, thereby enabling the judge or jury to render well-informed opinions. For expert witnesses, communication is everything, including nonverbal communication that critically determines if judges and, particularly, jurors believe a witness. To these ends, an expert medical witnesses should know the case; be objective; be a good teacher; state opinions clearly; testify with appropriate professional demeanor; communicate well, both verbally and nonverbally; in verbal communications, explain medical terms and procedures so listeners can understand the case; and avoid medical jargon, finding fault or blaming, becoming argumentative, or appearing arrogant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document