Interventions for Increasing HIV Testing Uptake in Migrants: A Systematic Review of Evidence

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 2844-2859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eithandee Aung ◽  
Sarah J. Blondell ◽  
Jo Durham
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Testing Uptake

Behavioral Interventions Improve Condom Use and HIV Testing Uptake Among Female Sex Workers in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric P.F. Chow ◽  
Keith Tung ◽  
Joseph D. Tucker ◽  
Kathryn E. Muessig ◽  
Shu Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Condom Use ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Sex Workers ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Female Sex Workers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Female Sex ◽  
Testing Uptake

scholarly journals Comparing the effects of HIV self-testing to standard HIV testing for key populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Medicine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Charles Witzel ◽  
Ingrid Eshun-Wilson ◽  
Muhammad S. Jamil ◽  
Nerissa Tilouche ◽  
Carmen Figueroa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Linkage To Care ◽  
Hiv Care ◽  
Key Populations ◽  
Sti Testing ◽  
Trans People ◽  
Testing Uptake ◽  
Linkage To Hiv Care ◽  
Positive Results

Abstract Background We update a previous systematic review to inform new World Health Organization HIV self-testing (HIVST) recommendations. We compared the effects of HIVST to standard HIV testing services to understand which service delivery models are effective for key populations. Methods We did a systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared HIVST to standard HIV testing in key populations, published from 1 January 2006 to 4 June 2019 in PubMed, Embase, Global Index Medicus, Social Policy and Practice, PsycINFO, Health Management Information Consortium, EBSCO CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. We extracted study characteristic and outcome data and conducted risk of bias assessments using the Cochrane ROB tool version 1. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, and pooled effect estimates were assessed along with other evidence characteristics to determine the overall strength of the evidence using GRADE methodology. Results After screening 5909 titles and abstracts, we identified 10 RCTs which reported on testing outcomes. These included 9679 participants, of whom 5486 were men who have sex with men (MSM), 72 were trans people and 4121 were female sex workers. Service delivery models included facility-based, online/mail and peer distribution. Support components were highly diverse and ranged from helplines to training and supervision. HIVST increased testing uptake by 1.45 times (RR=1.45 95% CI 1.20, 1.75). For MSM and small numbers of trans people, HIVST increased the mean number of HIV tests by 2.56 over follow-up (mean difference = 2.56; 95% CI 1.24, 3.88). There was no difference between HIVST and SoC in regard to positivity among tested overall (RR = 0.91; 95% CI 0.73, 1.15); in sensitivity analysis of positivity among randomised HIVST identified significantly more HIV infections among MSM and trans people (RR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.20, 4.08) and in online/mail distribution systems (RR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.14, 4.32). Yield of positive results in FSW was not significantly different between HIVST and SoC. HIVST reduced linkage to care by 17% compared to SoC overall (RR = 0.83; 95% CI 0.74, 0.92). Impacts on STI testing were mixed; two RCTs showed no decreases in STI testing while one showed significantly lower STI testing in the intervention arm. There were no negative impacts on condom use (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.83, 1.08), and social harm was very rare. Conclusions HIVST is safe and increases testing uptake and frequency as well as yield of positive results for MSM and trans people without negative effects on linkage to HIV care, STI testing, condom use or social harm. Testing uptake was increased for FSW, yield of positive results were not and linkage to HIV care was worse. Strategies to improve linkage to care outcomes for both groups are crucial for effective roll-out.

scholarly journals HIV Self-Testing Uptake and Intervention Strategies Among Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akeen Hamilton ◽  
Noah Thompson ◽  
Augustine T. Choko ◽  
Mbuzeleni Hlongwa ◽  
Pauline Jolly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Sex Workers ◽  
Linkage To Care ◽  
Intervention Strategies ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Manual Search ◽  
Self Testing ◽  
Testing Uptake ◽  
Sub Saharan

Background: HIV testing is an essential gateway to HIV prevention and treatment services. However, HIV testing uptake remains low among men due to stigma, discrimination, and confidentiality concerns. HIV self-testing (HIVST) is an alternative HIV testing method that can address many of these barriers for men. We conducted a systematic review to examine HIVST uptake and intervention strategies among Men in Sub-Saharan Africa.Methods: We used a systematic approach to survey literature published from January 2010 to June 2020 using five electronic databases (PubMed-Medline, CINAHL Complete, PsychINFO, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) and a manual search. Studies were included if they were peer-reviewed, published in English, and examined HIVST willingness, uptake, and/or linkage to care and included men in Sub-Saharan Africa.Results: Sixty-three articles related to HIVST were reviewed. Of the included articles, 37 discussed HIVST uptake/acceptability and 24 discussed intervention strategies. Both oral swab and finger-prick methods had high acceptability with ease of access and availability of the test cited as important by men. Free HIVST kits were preferred by men. Secondary distribution of kits via peers, sexual partners, and female sex workers were successful.Conclusion: HIV self-testing is highly acceptable to men. More efforts are needed to develop policies to implement HIVST programs targeting men in Sub-Saharan Africa, including a focus on linkage to care in sub-Saharan Africa. Future interventions should directly target men independently in tandem with using peers and their romantic partners to promote self-testing among men in sub-Saharan Africa. HIVST kit distribution strategies should be combined with services that can offer confirmatory tests and counseling for men as well as linkage to care.

scholarly journals Using Digital Communication Technology to Increase HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

10.2196/14230 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. e14230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Veronese ◽  
Kathleen Elizabeth Ryan ◽  
Chad Hughes ◽  
Megan SC Lim ◽  
Alisa Pedrana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Prevention ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Communication Technology ◽  
Digital Technology ◽  
Digital Communication ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Digital Interventions ◽  
Testing Uptake ◽  
Sex With Men

Background HIV continues to disproportionately affect men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW). Undiagnosed HIV is a major driver of HIV transmission rates, and increasing the uptake of regular HIV testing and facilitating timely initiation of HIV treatment is a global HIV prevention priority. However, MSM and TW experience a range of barriers that limit their access to testing and other prevention services. Given their growing ubiquity, digital communication technologies are increasingly being used to support HIV prevention efforts, and a growing number of studies have trialed the use of digital technology to promote HIV testing among MSM and TW. Objective We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of digital communication technology on HIV testing uptake among MSM and TW. Subanalyses aimed to identify the features and characteristics of digital interventions associated with greater impact. Methods A systematic literature review was undertaken using select databases and conference repositories. Studies describing the use of a digital technology—internet-enabled devices, including phones, tablets, and computers—to increase HIV testing uptake among MSM or TW using either randomized or observational cohort design with measurement of HIV testing rates measured pre- and postintervention, and published in English between 2010 and 2018 were included. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random effects meta-analysis. Subanalyses calculated effect estimates grouped by selected features of digital interventions. Results A total of 13 randomized or observational studies were included in the final review. Digital interventions most commonly used mainstream, existing social media platforms (n=7) or promotion through online peer educators (n=5). Most interventions (n=8) were categorized as interactive and allowed user engagement and most directly facilitated testing (n=7) either by providing self-testing kits or referral to testing services. A total of 1930 participants were included across the 13 studies. HIV testing uptake among MSM and TW exposed to digital interventions was 1.5 times higher than that of unexposed MSM and TW (risk ratio [RR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.7). Subanalyses suggested an increased impact on HIV testing uptake among interventions that were delivered through mainstream social media–based platforms (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.3-2.1), included direct facilitation of HIV testing (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.9), were interactive (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.8), and involved end users in the design process (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.0). Conclusions These findings provide broad support for the integration of technology with existing approaches to promote and facilitate HIV testing among MSM and TW. Our findings identified key features that may be associated with greater impact on HIV testing uptake and can be used to inform future development efforts given the growing interest and application of digital technologies in HIV prevention. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42017070055; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017070055.

scholarly journals Using Digital Communication Technology to Increase HIV Testing Among Men Who Have Sex With Men and Transgender Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Veronese ◽  
Kathleen Elizabeth Ryan ◽  
Chad Hughes ◽  
Megan SC Lim ◽  
Alisa Pedrana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Prevention ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Communication Technology ◽  
Digital Technology ◽  
Digital Communication ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Digital Interventions ◽  
Testing Uptake ◽  
Sex With Men

BACKGROUND HIV continues to disproportionately affect men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW). Undiagnosed HIV is a major driver of HIV transmission rates, and increasing the uptake of regular HIV testing and facilitating timely initiation of HIV treatment is a global HIV prevention priority. However, MSM and TW experience a range of barriers that limit their access to testing and other prevention services. Given their growing ubiquity, digital communication technologies are increasingly being used to support HIV prevention efforts, and a growing number of studies have trialed the use of digital technology to promote HIV testing among MSM and TW. OBJECTIVE We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of digital communication technology on HIV testing uptake among MSM and TW. Subanalyses aimed to identify the features and characteristics of digital interventions associated with greater impact. METHODS A systematic literature review was undertaken using select databases and conference repositories. Studies describing the use of a digital technology—internet-enabled devices, including phones, tablets, and computers—to increase HIV testing uptake among MSM or TW using either randomized or observational cohort design with measurement of HIV testing rates measured pre- and postintervention, and published in English between 2010 and 2018 were included. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using a random effects meta-analysis. Subanalyses calculated effect estimates grouped by selected features of digital interventions. RESULTS A total of 13 randomized or observational studies were included in the final review. Digital interventions most commonly used mainstream, existing social media platforms (n=7) or promotion through online peer educators (n=5). Most interventions (n=8) were categorized as interactive and allowed user engagement and most directly facilitated testing (n=7) either by providing self-testing kits or referral to testing services. A total of 1930 participants were included across the 13 studies. HIV testing uptake among MSM and TW exposed to digital interventions was 1.5 times higher than that of unexposed MSM and TW (risk ratio [RR] 1.5; 95% CI 1.3-1.7). Subanalyses suggested an increased impact on HIV testing uptake among interventions that were delivered through mainstream social media–based platforms (RR 1.7; 95% CI 1.3-2.1), included direct facilitation of HIV testing (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.9), were interactive (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.4-1.8), and involved end users in the design process (RR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.0). CONCLUSIONS These findings provide broad support for the integration of technology with existing approaches to promote and facilitate HIV testing among MSM and TW. Our findings identified key features that may be associated with greater impact on HIV testing uptake and can be used to inform future development efforts given the growing interest and application of digital technologies in HIV prevention. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42017070055; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017070055.

The use of social marketing campaigns to increase HIV testing uptake: a systematic review

AIDS Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
John O. Olawepo ◽  
Jennifer R. Pharr ◽  
Axenya Kachen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Social Marketing ◽  
Testing Uptake ◽  
Social Marketing Campaigns

scholarly journals A systematic review and network meta-analyses to assess the effectiveness of HIV self-testing distribution strategies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Eshun-Wilson ◽  
Muhammad S Jamil ◽  
Witzel T. Charles ◽  
Dave V Glidden ◽  
Johnson Cheryl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Hiv Testing ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sub Saharan Africa ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Standard Testing ◽  
Self Testing ◽  
Testing Uptake ◽  
Sub Saharan ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify which HIV self-testing (HIVST) distribution strategies are most effective. Methods We abstracted data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies published between June 4, 2006 and June 4, 2019. Results We included 33 studies, yielding six HIVST distribution strategies. All distribution strategies increased testing uptake compared to standard testing: in sub-Saharan Africa, partner HIVST distribution ranked highest (78% probability); in North America, Asia and the Pacific regions, web-based distribution ranked highest (93% probability), and facility based distribution ranked second in all settings. Across HIVST distribution strategies HIV positivity and linkage was similar to standard testing. Conclusion A range of HIVST distribution strategies are effective in increasing HIV testing. HIVST distribution by sexual partners, web-based distribution, as well as health facility distribution strategies should be considered for implementation to expand the reach of HIV testing services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document