scholarly journals Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and estradiol and drug concentrations in patients experiencing toxicity from adjuvant aromatase inhibitors

2017 ◽  
Vol 164 (2) ◽  
pp. 411-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal C. Kadakia ◽  
Kelley M. Kidwell ◽  
Nicholas J. Seewald ◽  
Claire F. Snyder ◽  
Anna Maria Storniolo ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Dawn L Hershman ◽  
Alfred I Neugut ◽  
Anna Moseley ◽  
Kathryn B Arnold ◽  
Julie R Gralow ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Nonadherence to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is common and increases risk of breast cancer (BC) recurrence. We analyzed factors associated with nonadherence among patients enrolled in S1105, a randomized trial of text messaging. Methods At enrollment, patients were required to have been on an adjuvant AI for at least 30 days and were asked about financial, medication, and demographic factors. They completed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) representing pain (Brief Pain Inventory), endocrine symptoms (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Endocrine Symptoms), and beliefs about medications (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine; Brief Medication Questionnaire). Our primary endpoint was AI nonadherence at 36 months, defined as urine AI metabolite assay of less than 10 ng/mL or no submitted specimen. We evaluated the association between individual baseline characteristics and nonadherence with logistic regression. A composite risk score reflecting the number of statistically significant baseline characteristics was examined. Results We analyzed data from 702 patients; median age was 60.9 years. Overall, 35.9% patients were nonadherent at 36 months. Younger patients (younger than age 65 years) were more nonadherent (38.8% vs 28.6%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 2.16; P = .02). Fourteen baseline PRO scales were each statistically significantly associated with nonadherence. In a composite risk model categorized into quartile levels, each increase in risk level was associated with a 46.5% increase in the odds of nonadherence (OR = 1.47, 95% CI =1.26 to 1.70; P < .001). The highest-risk patients were more than 3 times more likely to be nonadherent than the lowest-risk patients (OR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.97 to 5.02; P < .001). Conclusions The presence of multiple baseline PRO-specified risk factors was statistically significantly associated with AI nonadherence. The use of these assessments can help identify patients for targeted interventions to improve adherence.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1267-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie L. Holihan ◽  
Juan R. Flores-Gonzalez ◽  
Jiandi Mo ◽  
Tien C. Ko ◽  
Lillian S. Kao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 149 (3) ◽  
pp. 484-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon D. Armbruster ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
Shannon N. Westin ◽  
Diane C. Bodurka ◽  
Lois Ramondetta ◽  
...  

Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 162-167
Author(s):  
Elaine Redmond ◽  
Jordan Bekkema ◽  
Keith Rourke

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document