The 21-gene recurrence score in node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer: a cautionary tale from an NCDB analysis

Author(s):  
Roi Weiser ◽  
Waqar Haque ◽  
Efstathia Polychronopoulou ◽  
Sandra S. Hatch ◽  
Yong-fang Kuo ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1829-1834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitch Dowsett ◽  
Jack Cuzick ◽  
Christopher Wale ◽  
John Forbes ◽  
Elizabeth A. Mallon ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine whether the Recurrence Score (RS) provided independent information on risk of distant recurrence (DR) in the tamoxifen and anastrozole arms of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) Trial. Patients and Methods RNA was extracted from 1,372 tumor blocks from postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor–positive primary breast cancer in the monotherapy arms of ATAC. Twenty-one genes were assessed by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and the RS was calculated. Cox proportional hazards models assessed the value of adding RS to a model with clinical variables (age, tumor size, grade, and treatment) in node-negative (N0) and node-positive (N+) women. Results Reportable scores were available from 1,231 evaluable patients (N0, n = 872; N+, n = 306; and node status unknown, n = 53); 72, 74, and six DRs occurred in N0, N+, and node status unknown patients, respectively. For both N0 and N+ patients, RS was significantly associated with time to DR in multivariate analyses (P < .001 for N0 and P = .002 for N+). RS also showed significant prognostic value beyond that provided by Adjuvant! Online (P < .001). Nine-year DR rates in low (RS < 18), intermediate (RS = 18 to 30), and high RS (RS ≥ 31) groups were 4%, 12%, and 25%, respectively, in N0 patients and 17%, 28%, and 49%, respectively, in N+ patients. The prognostic value of RS was similar in anastrozole- and tamoxifen-treated patients. Conclusion This study confirmed the performance of RS in postmenopausal HR+ patients treated with tamoxifen in a large contemporary population and demonstrated that RS is an independent predictor of DR in N0 and N+ hormone receptor–positive patients treated with anastrozole, adding value to estimates with standard clinicopathologic features.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Puglisi ◽  
Lorenzo Gerratana ◽  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Luca Boni ◽  
...  

AbstractThe GIM2 phase III trial demonstrated the benefit of dose-dense chemotherapy in node-positive early breast cancer (eBC). To better define the dose-dense effect in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup, we evaluated its benefit through a composite measure of recurrence risk. We conducted an ancillary analysis of the GIM2 trial evaluating the absolute treatment effect through a composite measure of recurrence risk (CPRS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative eBC. CPRS was estimated through Cox proportional hazards models applied to the different clinicopathological features. The treatment effect was compared to the values of CPRS by using the Sub-population Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) process. The Disease-Free Survival (DFS)-oriented STEPP analysis showed distinct patterns of relative treatment effect with respect to CPRS. Overall, 5-year DFS differed across CPRS quartiles ranging from 95.2 to 66.4%. Each CPRS quartile was characterized by a different patients’ composition, especially for age, lymph node involvement, tumor size, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, and Ki-67. A number needed to treat of 154 and 6 was associated with the lowest and the highest CPRS quartile, respectively. Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy showed a consistent benefit in node-positive eBC patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative disease, but its effect varied according to CPRS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 523-523
Author(s):  
Sowmya Goranta ◽  
Eduard Drizik ◽  
UyoyoTonte Omaduvie ◽  
Tarek Haykal ◽  
Areeg Bala ◽  
...  

523 Background: The Oncotype-DX recurrence score (RS) allows providers to identify hormone receptor positive and HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) patients that may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). The TAILORx Trial showed no benefit of AC among patients with RS of 11-25, except for patients younger than 50 years. There are, however, limited studies examining any benefit of AC among those with RS of 26-30. We sought to examine the effect of AC on BC-specific survival among these patients utilizing a national database. Methods: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for newly diagnosed female BC patients between 2010-2015. We included patients with T1-T3, hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, and lymph node-negative BC with RS of 26-30. Patients with tumors 5 mm or less and with incomplete records were excluded. Cox Proportional-Hazards Model was done to examine the effect of AC on BC-specific survival. A sub-group analysis was performed for patients younger than 50 years to examine the effect of AC on BC-specific survival. Results: We included 2,982 patients, of whom 1,686 (56.5%) received AC. Administration of AC was associated with lower age (56.5 [9.2] vs 61.8 [9.7], p < 0.001), Grade III&IV (39.7% vs 30.2%, p < 0.001), married or patients with partners (66.5% vs 61.5%, p < 0.001), and T stage > 1 (31.3% vs 26.8%, p = 0.03). AC was not associated with insurance status, race, and histology. Overall 5-year BC-specific survival was 97.3% (96.2-98.3%). After adjustment through cox regression, AC was found to not have an effect on survival (HR: 0.54 [0.27-1.10], p = 0.09). There were 579 (19.4%) patients that were younger than 50 years, and AC did not have an effect on survival among these patients (HR: 0.44 [0.08-2.44], p = 0.35). Similarly, among the 2,403 (80.6%) patients aged 50 or older, AC did not have an effect on survival (HR: 0.49 [0.22-1.11], p = 0.09). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, administration of AC was associated with lower age, higher grade, marital status, and T stage. AC did not affect BC-specific survival among patients with a RS of 26-30. Subgroup analysis did not show any benefit of AC among patients younger than 50 years or among those 50 or older. Further prospective randomized trials are warranted to identify sub-groups that may potentially benefit from AC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document