Validation of clinical prognostic indices for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the National Cancer Data Base

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1163-1172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Olszewski ◽  
Eric S. Winer ◽  
Jorge J. Castillo
Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4226-4226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindor Qunaj ◽  
Jorge J. Castillo ◽  
Adam J Olszewski

Introduction: CD20-negative subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are rare, aggressive malignancies. Recently, cancer registries in the United States (US) have distinguished specific subtypes of CD20-negative DLBCL: since 2004-primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), and since 2010-plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL), ALK+ large B-cell lymphoma (ALK+LBCL), and large B-cell lymphoma arising in HHV8+ multicentric Castleman disease (HHV8+MCD). Our objective was to provide the first large-scale analysis of those lymphomas, focusing on their epidemiology, treatment, and outcomes relative to unspecified DLBCL (DLBCL-NOS). Methods: Using data from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we selected patients with PEL (2004-2013) and with PBL, ALK+LBCL and HHV8+MCD (2010-2013), and compared their characteristics and management with contemporaneous DLBCL-NOS. We analyzed receipt of chemotherapy in subsets defined by histology and HIV status. We then compared overall survival (OS) from diagnosis in a multivariate Cox model stratified by age, sex, race, stage, and HIV status, reporting adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Predicted survival of DLBCL-NOS matched by the same variables was calculated from flexible parametric models. Results: Of the 801 identified cases, 228 were PEL, 481 PBL, 77 HHV8+MCD, and 15 ALK+LBCL. We compared them with 68,402 contemporary cases of DLBCL-NOS. Patients with CD20-negative lymphomas were significantly younger on average (Table), more often male, HIV+ (except for ALK+LBCL), and less frequently non-Hispanic whites (NHW). Among patients with PEL, PBL, and HHV8+MCD, those who were HIV+ were significantly younger than HIV-negative (median age, 45 versus 70 years), more often male (88% versus 70%), less often NHW (49% versus 80%), and had more B symptoms (44% versus 21%, all P<.0001), but stage distribution did not significantly differ according to HIV+ status (P=.09). PEL cases with specified primary site were pleural/thoracic in 82%, and peritoneal/abdominal in 18%. Among PBL cases, 21% arose from the head/neck area, 21% from gastrointestinal tract, and 58% from other (or unspecified) areas. Almost all ALK+ cases, and 79% of HHV8+MCD, were nodal, whereas 53% of PBL cases were extranodal. Compared with DLBCL-NOS, the use of chemotherapy was significantly less frequent among patients with PEL, PBL, HHV8+MCD (Table, all P<.0001), but not among those with ALK+LBCL (P=.96). In contrast to DLBCL-NOS, HIV+ status was associated with a higher likelihood of receiving chemotherapy in PEL (60%, versus 46% for HIV-negative, P=.035) and PBL (75% versus 59%, respectively, P=.0003), without a significant difference in HHV8+MCD (59% versus 61%, respectively, P=.82). Compared with matched DLBCL-NOS cases, OS was significantly worse for patients with PEL, PBL or ALK+LBCL, but not for those with HHV8+MCD (Table, Figure). HIV+ status was not associated with worse OS in PEL (P=.22), PBL (P=.39) or HHV8+MCD (P=.56) after adjusting for age difference. Advanced stage was associated with worse OS in PBL (P=.0002), but not in ALK+LBCL (P=.98) or HHV8+MCD (P=.27). Conclusions: This large analysis of CD20-negative DLBCL subtypes using nationwide registry data reveals new information about these rare disorders. While PEL, PBL and HHV8+MCD are strongly associated with HIV infection, ALK+LBCL is not, although it still occurs in younger patients with male predominance. HIV+ patients with PEL, PBL, or HHV8+MCD do not have worse survival outcomes than those who are HIV-negative. Furthermore, despite the association with HIV, survival of HHV8+MCD is overall not worse than that of matched DLBCL-NOS cases. In contrast, the other subtypes have a significantly worse survival compared with DLBCL-NOS, highlighting the unmet need for improved therapeutic approaches. ALK+LBCL is either exceptionally rare, or underdiagnosed in the current practice, and has poor OS, warranting studies of ALK-targeted therapy. Disclosures Castillo: Otsuka: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Millennium: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Biogen: Consultancy. Olszewski:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 364-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Painschab ◽  
Edwards Kasonkanji ◽  
Takondwa Zuze ◽  
Bongani Kaimila ◽  
Tamiwe Tomoka ◽  
...  

Praxis ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Lohri

Zusammenfassung. Maligne Lymphome unterteilen sich zwar in über 60 Entitäten, das grosszellige B-Zell-Lymphom, das follikuläre Lymphom, der Hodgkin und das Mantelzell-Lymphom machen aber mehr als die Hälfte aller Lymphome aus. Im revidierten Ann Arbor staging system gelten die Suffixe «A» und «B» nur noch für den Hodgkin. «E» erscheint nur noch bei Stadien I und II. Eine Knochenmarksuntersuchung wird beim Hodgkin nicht mehr verlangt, beim DLBCL (Diffuse large B cell lymphoma) nur, falls das PET keinen Knochenmark-Befall zeigt. Der PET-Untersuchung, speziell dem Interim-PET, kommt eine entscheidende Bedeutung zu. PET-gesteuerte Therapien führen zu weniger Toxizität. Gezielt wirkende Medikamente mit eindrücklicher Wirksamkeit wurden neu zugelassen. Deren Kosten sind hoch. Eine strahlen- und chemotherapiefreie Behandlung maligner Lymphome wird in Zukunft möglich sein.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document