Age-related Survival Outcomes for Pancreatic Cancer by Age

Background/Aim: Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis, though outcomes based on age are not well characterized. The aim of current study was to analyze the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer based on age. Patients and Methods: Using National Cancer Data Base (NCDB), we determined survival outcome based on age among patients with pancreatic cancer. Results: A total of 423,482 patients between 2004 and 2017 were included in the study. Patients aged between 18 and 40-years-old had the worst 3-year survival rate among stage 1 disease. Conversely, patients over 65-years-old had the worst 3-year survival rate and presented with more advanced disease (clinical stages 3 and 4). Conclusion: Older patients with more advanced disease had worse survival.

P-OGC35 Does Adjuvant Chemotherapy Provide Additional Survival Benefit AfterNeoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy and Esophagectomy forEsophageal Adenocarcinoma?

Background The evidence assessing the additional benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT; i.e. chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) and esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are limited. This study aimed to determine whether AC improves long-term survival in patients receiving NAT and esophagectomy. Methods Patients receiving esophagectomy for EAC following NAT from 2004 - 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Patients with survival < 6 months were excluded to account for immortality bias. Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression was performed to account for selection bias and analyze impact of AC on overall survival. Results Overall 12,972 (91%) did not receive AC and 1,255 (9%) received AC. After PSM there were 2,485 who received AC and 1,254 who did not. After matching, AC was associated with improved survival (median: 38.5 vs 32.3 months, p < 0.001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.78, CI 95% : 0.71 - 0.87, p < 0.001). On multivariable interaction analyses, this benefit persisted in subgroup analysis for nodal status: N0 (HR: 0.85, CI 95% : 0.69 - 0.96, p = 0.039), N1 (HR: 0.66, CI 95% : 0.56 - 0.78, p < 0.001), N2/3 (HR: 0.80, CI 95% : 0.66 - 0.97, p = 0.024) and margin status: R0 (HR: 0.77, CI 95% : 0.69 - 0.86, p < 0.001), R1 (HR: 0.60, CI 95% : 0.43 - 0.85, p = 0.004). Further, patients with stable disease following NAT (HR: 0.60, CI 95% : 0.59 - 0.80, p < 0.001) or downstaged (HR: 0.80, CI 95% : 0.68 - 0.95, p = 0.009) disease had significant survival benefit after AC, but not patients with upstaged disease. Conclusions AC following NAT and esophagectomy is associated with improved survival, even in node-negative and margin-negative disease. NAT response appears crucial in identifying patients who will benefit maximally from AC, and thus future research must be focused on identifying tumors that respond to chemotherapy to maximize this prognostic benefit.

NCOG-08. BIOPSY-ONLY GLIOBLASTOMA (BO-GBM) AS A HETEROGENEOUS GROUP OF PATIENTS

BACKGROUND “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma is associated with a heterogeneous functional and survival outcome. It is an understudied group of patients which has been reported to represent 21% of histologically confirmed GBM in the US National Cancer Data Base. Pattern of care included radiotherapy-temozolomide (RT-TMZ) completed in 15% of patients, any other form of oncologic treatment in 60%, and supportive care alone in 25% of patients. Our objective was to explore treatment and prognosis of BO-GBM. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with BO-GBM included in a prospective regional glioma SIRIC cohort in 2014-2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patient characteristics, MRI finding, treatment allocation and delivery. PFS and OS were analyzed. RESULTS Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 449 patients were included at initial surgery, of which 158 patients (35%) underwent biopsy only. Of 158 patients, 18 were excluded for missing data leaving 139 patients for the present analysis. Fifty-four (39%) were referred to RT-TMZ, 68 (49%) considered unfitted for RT received chemotherapy upfront (CT-UF), 17 (12%) were referred to palliative care. Groups differed at baseline for age (mean 60 and 68 years, for RT-TMZ, CT-UF respectively); KPS (70, 60 for RT-TMZ, CT-UF); mean tumor surface (793, 1420 mm2 for RT-TMZ, CT-UF); and tumor extension (bilateral in 6.4% and 29.3% for RT-CT and CT-UF respectively). Median OS was 14 months (95% CI, 9.65-18.71) and 8 months (95% CI, 4.62-7.67) for RT-TMZ, CT-UF respectively. CONCLUSION Inoperable GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one third of patients are amenable to standard of care, with survival outcome close to the one of patients who underwent surgery. Patients considered unfit for RT-CT at diagnosis exhibit a poor survival outcome. Thus, reliable criteria are needed to help selecting patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.

P04.08 Biopsy-only glioblastoma (BO-GBM) as a heterogeneous group of patients

BACKGROUND “Biopsy-only” glioblastoma is associated with a heterogeneous functional and survival outcome. BO-GBM patients is an understudied group of patients associated to a poor outcome, which has been reported to represent 21% of histologically confirmed GBM in the US National Cancer Data Base. Pattern of care included radiotherapy-temozolomide (RT-TMZ) standard regimen completed in 15% of patients, any other form of oncologic treatment in 60%, and supportive care alone in 25% of patients. Our objective was to explore pattern of care and prognosis associated to BO-GBM in our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients with BO-GBM included in a prospective regional glioma SIRIC cohort initiated in 2014 and closed in 2017 were retrospectively reviewed for patients characteristics, MRI finding, treatment allocation and delivery. PFS and OS were analyzed. RESULTS Of 535 patients included in the cohort, 86 patients were referred > 3 months post-surgery and were excluded from this analysis while 449 patients were included at initial surgery, of which 158 patients (35%) underwent biopsy only. Of 158 patients, 18 patients were excluded for missing data leaving 139 patients for the present analysis. Fifty-four (39%) were referred to RT-TMZ (50 patients completed concomitant treatment), 68 (49%) considered unfitted for RT received chemotherapy upfront (CT-UF) (of which 4 were subsequently referred to RT), 17 (12%) were referred to palliative care only (PC). Groups differed at baseline for age (mean 60, 68, and 69 years, for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, and PC respectively); for KPS (70, 60, and 50 for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, and PC respectively); for mean tumor surface measured on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (793, 1420, 1412 mm2 for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, PC); for tumor extension (bilateral in 6.4% and 29.3% for RT-TMZ and CT-UF respectively); for mean steroid intake (45, 60, 100 mg daily respectively). Median OS was 14 months (95% CI, 9.65–18.71), 8 months (95% CI, 4.62–7.67), and 2 months (95% CI, 0.67–3.33) for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, and PC respectively. CONCLUSION Inoperable GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which one third of patients are amenable to standard of care, with survival outcome close to the one of patients who underwent surgery. Patients considered unfit for RT-TMZ at diagnosis fail to be referred subsequently to RT after CT and exhibit a poor survival outcome. Thus, reliable criteria are needed to help selecting patients for adequate treatment while new strategies are warranted for BO-GBM unfit for RT.

A Consideration for Surgical Management in Select T4b Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objectives: The role of surgery for conventionally “unresectable” (cT4b) oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is unclear. We analyzed factors associated with overall survival in cT4b relative to cT4a oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: We identified 6830 cT4a and 522 cT4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma chemoradiation or surgery + adjuvant therapy patients in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2016. The main outcome was overall survival. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-squared tests, univariable and multivariable regression analysis. Results: The cT4b group had a higher rate of positive margins (30.4% vs 21.3%, P = .009) and downstaging (41.2% vs 13.1%; P < .001) compared to cT4a, while only 1.7% were upstaged. cT4b surgery + chemoradiation patients had similar survival to cT4a surgery + radiation (HR 0.93; 95% CI, 0.70-1.25) and cT4a surgery + chemoradiation patients (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.69-1.23), while cT4b surgery + radiation patients had worse OS (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.05-1.47). Conclusions: Clinical T4b staging is a poor predictor of pathologic staging given a high rate of downstaging on final pathology. Surgical resection with adjuvant chemoradiation is an option in select cT4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Association of inoperable glioblastoma with a heterogeneous functional and survival outcome.

e14036 Background: “Biopsy only” GBM patients is an understudied group of patients associated to a poor outcome, which has been reported to represent 21% of histologically confirmed GBM in the US National Cancer Data Base. Pattern of care included radiotherapy-temozolomide (RT-TMZ) standard regimen completed in 15% of patients, any other form of oncologic treatment in 60%, and supportive care alone in 25% of patients (Kole, Cancer 2016). Our objective was to explore heterogeneity of inoperable GBM patients group, both for patients characteristics, pattern of care planned and completed, functional and survival outcome. Methods: Patients with inoperable GBM included in a prospective regional glioma cohort initiated in 2014 were retrospectively reviewed for patients characteristics, MRI finding, treatment allocation and delivery. Functional independency analyzed as a cumulative time of KPS≥70, PFS and OS were analyzed. Results: Of 535 patients referred to our center, 449 patients were included at initial surgery, of which 158 patients (35%) underwent biopsy only. 18 patients were excluded for missing data leaving 139 patients for the present analysis. 54 (39%) were referred to RT-TMZ (50 patients completed concomitant treatment), 68 (49%) considered unfitted for RT received chemotherapy upfront (CT-UF) (of which 3 were subsequently referred to RT), 17 (12%) referred to palliative care only (PC). Groups differed at baseline for age (mean 60, 68, 69y for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, PC respectively); for KPS (70, 60, 50 for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, PC respectively); for mean tumor surface (793, 1420, 1412 cm2 for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, PC); for tumor extension (bilateral in 6.4% and 29.3% for RT-CT and CT-UF respectively); for steroid intake (45, 60, 100 mg daily respectively). Median OS was 14 months (95% CI, 9.65-18.71), 8 months (95% CI, 4.62-7.67), 2 months (95% CI, 0.67-3.33) for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, PC respectively. Of importance, mean duration of functional independence was of 8.3 months, 2.1 months, and 0.1 month for RT-TMZ, CT-UF, and PC respectively; 33/139 (24%) of the patients experienced functional independency for more than 40% of their life time. Conclusions: Inoperable GBM constitute a large and heterogeneous population in which more than 1/3 of the patients are amenable to standard of care, with survival outcome similar to the one of patients who underwent surgery. Patients considered unfit for RT-CT at diagnosis fail to be referred subsequently to RT after CT and exhibit a poor survival outcome that deserve new effective treatments. Cumulative duration of functional independence is limited and should be considered as part of treatment evaluation.

Invasive Paget’s disease of the breast versus genitalia versus skin: What are the demographic and prognostic differences?

e17577 Background: Invasive extramammary Paget’s disease is most commonly in the vulva but can also occur in other genitalia as well as primary skin locations (face, scalp, neck, trunk, extremities). We aim to determine the clinicopathologic and prognostic factors of invasive Paget’s disease of the breast, genitalia and skin. Methods: Data on patients with invasive Paget’s disease of the breast, genitalia and skin were collected between 2001 and 2015 from the National Cancer Data Base Participant Use File 2016. Univariate, multivariate analyses, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were performed by SAS. Results: 10, 122 female patients were eligible, of which 7, 051 had invasive disease (breast n = 5, 105, genitalia n = 1, 717, skin n = 229) and the remainder had in situ disease. Median age for invasive disease was 63 years for breast, 73 years for genitalia and 75 years for skin. Among Whites, the proportion of invasive Paget’s of breast, genitalia, and skin was 70.8%, 25.8%, 3.4%; Blacks 93.8% breast, 5.3% genitalia and 0.9% skin; Asian/Pacific Islanders 65.0% breast, 31.8% genitalia and 3.2% skin. Among treatment institutions, academic centers treated 30.2% of invasive breast, 48.9% genitalia and 51.5% skin. Surgery was performed in 89.4% of invasive breast compared to 21.1% genitalia and 46.7% skin. Radiotherapy was administered to 25.3% of invasive breast, 3.0% genitalia and 15.3% skin. Chemotherapy was given to 28.0% of breast, 1.9% genitalia and 5.7% skin. Early stage (I or II) disease was diagnosed in 70.8% of invasive breast, 63% genitalia and 30.6% skin. Five-year OS from any cause for patients with invasive Paget’s disease of breast, genitalia and skin was 81.9%, 83.8%, and 69.9%, respectively. In univariate analysis, older age (HR 3.75, 95% CI 3.27-4.31, p < 0.001), Black race (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00-1.46, p = 0.046), history of other cancer (HR 1.53, 95%CI 1.36-1.71, p < 0.001), higher comorbidity score (HR 2.12, 95%CI 1.88-2.39, p < 0.001), higher stage (HR 4.25, 95%CI 3.73-4.85, p < 0.001), and no surgical treatment (HR 3.47, 95% CI 2.87-4.19, p < 0.001) were associated with worse survival. In multivariate analysis, invasive Paget’s of the skin was associated with the worst survival (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.19-2.05, p = 0.001). For all three types of invasive Paget’s disease, better prognosis was associated with Asian/Pacific Islander race (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.31-0.80, p = 0.004), income ≥ $63, 000 (HR 0.83, 0.70-0.98, p = 0.028) and treatment at an academic/research center (HR 0.78, 0.62-0.99, p = 0.037). Conclusions: Invasive Paget’s disease of the breast is 3-fold more common than genitalia with younger age at diagnosis. Most are diagnosed at early stages with good prognosis. Blacks have a higher proportion of invasive Paget’s disease of the breast than other races. Invasive Paget’s disease of primary skin had the poorest prognosis.