Numerical simulation of debris flow with application on hazard area mapping

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ko-Fei Liu ◽  
Ming Chung Huang
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Debris Flow ◽  
Hazard Area

scholarly journals NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF A DEBRIS FLOW CAUSED BY LANDSLIDE

2003 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 583-588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi SATOFUKA ◽  
Tamotsu TAKAHASHI
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Debris Flow

Numerical Simulation of the BIG’95 Debris Flow and of the Generated Tsunami

2014 ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Zaniboni ◽  
Gianluca Pagnoni ◽  
Alberto Armigliato ◽  
Stefano Tinti ◽  
Olaia Iglesias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Debris Flow

A numerical simulation of debris flow and its application

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng-Lun Shieh ◽  
Chyan-Deng Jan ◽  
Yuan-Fan Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Debris Flow

scholarly journals Modeling debris-flow runout patterns on two alpine fans with different dynamic simulation models

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1483-1492 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Schraml ◽  
B. Thomschitz ◽  
B. W. McArdell ◽  
C. Graf ◽  
R. Kaitna
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Debris Flow ◽  
Mass Movement ◽  
Simulation Models ◽  
Realistic Model ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Alpine Regions ◽  
Digital Elevation ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

Abstract. Predicting potential deposition areas of future debris-flow events is important for engineering hazard assessment in alpine regions. To this end, numerical simulation models are commonly used tools. However, knowledge of appropriate model parameters is essential but often not available. In this study we use two numerical simulation models, RAMMS–DF (rapid mass movement system–debris-flow) and DAN3D (dynamic analysis of landslides in three dimensions), to back-calculate two well-documented debris-flow events in Austria and to compare the range and sensitivity of input parameters for the Voellmy flow model. All simulations are based on the same digital elevation models and similar boundary conditions. Our results show that observed deposition patterns are best matched with a parameter set of μ [–] and ξ [m s-2], ranging between 0.07 to 0.11 and 200 to 300 m s-2, respectively, for RAMMS–DF, and between 0.07 to 0.08 and 300 to 400 m s-2, respectively, for DAN3D. Sensitivity analysis shows a higher sensitivity of model parameters for the DAN3D model than for the RAMMS–DF model. This contributes to the evaluation of realistic model parameters for simulation of debris-flows in steep mountain catchments and highlights the sensitivity of the models.

GIS-based numerical simulation of Amamioshima debris flow in Japan

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 206-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Wu ◽  
Guangqi Chen ◽  
Lu Zheng ◽  
Yingbin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Numerical Simulation ◽  
Debris Flow

Development of Criteria for Zoning of Debris Flow Hazard Area(II) - The Comparison Between Estimated and Surveyed Values -

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung-Nam Kim ◽  
Suk-Woo Kim ◽  
Su-Jin Jang ◽  
Kwang-Youn Lee ◽  
Gi-Beom Seo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Debris Flow ◽  
Hazard Area ◽  
Debris Flow Hazard
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document