scholarly journals Evaluation of Different Bowel Preparations for Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 2900-2905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Pons Beltrán ◽  
Begoña González Suárez ◽  
Cecilia González Asanza ◽  
Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado ◽  
Servando Fernández Diez ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L Hansel ◽  
Joseph A Murray ◽  
Jeffrey A Alexander ◽  
David H Bruining ◽  
Mark V Larson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Capsule endoscopy (CE) is frequently hindered by intra-luminal debris. Our aim was to determine whether a combination bowel preparation would improve small-bowel visualization, diagnostic yield, and the completion rate of CE. Methods Single-blind, prospective randomized–controlled study of outpatients scheduled for CE. Bowel-preparation subjects ingested 2 L of polyethylene glycol solution the night prior to CE, 5 mL simethicone and 5 mg metoclopramide 20 minutes prior to CE and laid in the right lateral position 30 minutes after swallowing CE. Controls had no solid food after 7 p.m. the night prior to CE and no liquids 4 hours prior to CE. Participants completed a satisfaction survey. Capsule readers completed a small-bowel-visualization assessment. Results Fifty patients were prospectively enrolled (56% female) with a median age of 54.4 years and 44 completed the study (23 patients in the control group and 21 in the preparation group). There was no significant difference between groups on quartile-based small-bowel visualization (all P > 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups in diagnostic yield (P = 0.69), mean gastric (P = 0.10) or small-bowel transit time (P = 0.89). The small-bowel completion rate was significantly higher in the preparation group (100% vs 78%; P = 0.02). Bowel-preparation subjects reported significantly more discomfort than controls (62% vs 17%; P = 0.01). Conclusions Combined bowel preparation did not improve small-bowel visualization but did significantly increase patient discomfort. The CE completion rate improved in the preparation group but the diagnostic yield was unaffected. Based on our findings, a bowel preparation prior to CE does not appear to improve CE performance and results in decreased patient satisfaction (ClinicalTrials.gov, No. NCT01243736).


2006 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. AB161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicente Pons ◽  
Begona Gonzalez ◽  
Cecilia Gonzalez ◽  
Enrique Perez-Cuadrado ◽  
Servando Fernandez-Diez ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1120-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aymer Postgate ◽  
Paris Tekkis ◽  
Neil Patterson ◽  
Aine Fitzpatrick ◽  
Paul Bassett ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. AB316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Hansel ◽  
Christopher J. Gostout ◽  
Joseph a. Murray ◽  
Jeffrey a. Alexander ◽  
David H. Bruining ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 534-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikos Viazis ◽  
Spiros Sgouros ◽  
Kostis Papaxoinis ◽  
John Vlachogiannakos ◽  
Christina Bergele ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 437-442
Author(s):  
Miguel José Mascarenhas-Saraiva ◽  
◽  
Eduardo Oliveira ◽  
Miguel Nuno Mascarenhas-Saraiva ◽  
◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document