A hybrid framework for evaluating corporate sustainability using multi-criteria decision making

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Aktaş ◽  
N. Demirel
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Hybrid Framework

scholarly journals Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının Ölçümü İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Çerçeve: Henkel Örneği

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Öztel ◽  
Mehmet Said Köse ◽  
İhsan Aytekin
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Corporate Sustainability ◽  
Performance Data ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Social Aspects ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Economic Aspects ◽  
Sustainability Performance ◽  
Corporate Sustainability Performance

<p align="center"><strong>Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının Ölçümü İçin Çok Kriterli Bir Çerçeve: Henkel Örneği</strong><a title="" href="file:///E:/belgelerim%2018032015/ANA%20YEDEK/masa%C3%BCst%C3%BC%20dosyalar%C4%B1/dergi%20dosyalar%C4%B1/dergi%204.%20say%C4%B1/3%20%2032-44%20kurumsal%20s%C3%BCrd%C3%BCr%C3%BClebilirlik.docx#_ftn1"><strong>*</strong></a><strong></strong></p><p align="center"> </p><p align="right"> </p><p><strong>Özet</strong></p><p>Kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik performans ölçümü, kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğin çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik yönlerini ele almayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu üç boyutun tek bir boyuta indirgenmesinde sorunlar ortaya çıkmaktadır. Çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri, bu değişkenlerin birlikte değerlendirilmesi için kullanışlı bir çerçeve sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden uzlaşık programlama (compromise programing) çerçevesi kullanılarak Henkel firmasının kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik performansının değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmaktadır. Uygulamalı olan bu çalışmada veriler Henkel firmasının yıllık raporlarından temin edilmiştir. Ele alınan şirketin kurumsal yönetim performansı çevresel ve sosyal boyutlarıyla yıllara göre karşılaştırılmış ve sonuçta uzlaşık programlama yönteminin bu tür çalışmalarda kullanılması önerilmiştir.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Abstract</strong></p><p>Measurement of corporate sustainability performance is focused on environmental, social and economic aspects of corporate sustainability. Therefore, it can be argued that it is not easy to reduce all dimensions of corporate sustainability in a unit. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods provide a useful framework for the evaluation of these variables together. Using “compromise programing (CP)”, one of the MCDM methods, this study aimed to assess the corporate sustainability performance. Data were acquired from Henkel Company’s annual reports. Environmental and social aspects of Henkel’s corporate sustainability are compared by years, and in conclusion, using CP model to evaluate corporate sustainability is proposed.</p><div><br clear="all" /><div><p> </p></div></div>

Perancangan aplikasi multi criteria decision making dalam penerimaan beasiswa kepada dosen studi lanjut STMIK Balikpapan menggunakan metode SAW

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-42
Author(s):  
Muslimin B ◽  
Sumardi Sumardi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teaching Assistants ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Scholarship Recipients ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Application Decision ◽  
High Degree ◽  
New Student

 Interests and number of STMIK Balikpapan new student enrollments are increasing every year. The balance of the ratio of lecturers to students is one of the most important components in improving the quality and teaching and learning process of a university. Avoiding shortages in the number of lecturers can be realized by providing scholarship programs to alumni and teaching assistants. This study aims to build a multi criteria decision making application that can assist the Head of HRD in the process of receiving scholarships to advanced and effective study lecturers. The multi criteria decision making application developed in this study uses the SAW method. The implementation of the SAW method includes the process of evaluating the weighting of criteria, evaluating alternative weights, the matrix process, the results of decision making preferences, resulting in the weighting and ranking of each alternative candidate for the scholarship recipient. The results of the evaluation of multi-criteria application decision making in the study are expected to produce modeling with a high degree of accuracy. The results of the analysis carried out can provide alternative recommendations for prospective scholarship recipients to advanced study lecturers in STMIK Balikpapan.

Applying the Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model for Ranking Commercial Banks: The Case of Vietnam

2019 ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Duong Truong Thi Thuy ◽  
Anh Pham Thi Hoang
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Commercial Banks ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Topsis Method ◽  
Decision Making Model

Banking has always played an important role in the economy because of its effects on individuals as well as on the economy. In the process of renovation and modernization of the country, the system of commercial banks has changed dramatically. Business models and services have become more diversified. Therefore, the performance of commercial banks is always attracting the attention of managers, supervisors, banks and customers. Bank ranking can be viewed as a multi-criteria decision model. This article uses the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to rank some commercial banks in Vietnam.

Selection of Contractor Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Tools

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 139-142
Author(s):  
S.PUSHPARANI S.PUSHPARANI ◽  
◽  
Dr.S.SENTHAMILKUMAR Dr.S.SENTHAMILKUMAR
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Selection Of

Simultaneous Evaluation of Criteria and Alternatives (SECA) for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making

Informatica ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Keshavarz-Ghorabaee ◽  
Maghsoud Amiri ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas ◽  
Zenonas Turskis ◽  
Jurgita Antucheviciene
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Simultaneous Evaluation
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document