Association between diabetic retinopathy and polymorphisms of cytokine genes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s):  
Faria Jafarzadeh ◽  
Amin Javanbakht ◽  
Niloofar bakhtar ◽  
Alaleh Dalvand ◽  
Mahya Shabani ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e040997
Author(s):  
Varo Kirthi ◽  
Paul Nderitu ◽  
Uazman Alam ◽  
Jennifer Evans ◽  
Sarah Nevitt ◽  
...  

IntroductionThere is growing evidence of a higher than expected prevalence of retinopathy in prediabetes. This paper presents the protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis of retinopathy in prediabetes. The aim of the review is to estimate the prevalence of retinopathy in prediabetes and to summarise the current data.Methods and analysisThis protocol is developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. A comprehensive electronic bibliographic search will be conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Google Scholar and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies will report prevalence data for retinopathy on fundus photography in adults with prediabetes. No time restrictions will be placed on the date of publication. Screening for eligible studies and data extraction will be conducted by two reviewers independently, using predefined inclusion criteria and prepiloted data extraction forms. Disagreements between the reviewers will be resolved by discussion, and if required, a third (senior) reviewer will arbitrate.The primary outcome is the prevalence of any standard features of diabetic retinopathy (DR) on fundus photography, as per International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ICDRSS) classification. Secondary outcomes are the prevalence of (1) any retinal microvascular abnormalities on fundus photography that are not standard features of DR as per ICDRSS classification and (2) any macular microvascular abnormalities on fundus photography, including but not limited to the presence of macular exudates, microaneurysms and haemorrhages. Risk of bias for included studies will be assessed using a validated risk of bias tool for prevalence studies. Pooled estimates for the prespecified outcomes of interest will be calculated using random effects meta-analytic techniques. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the I2 statistic.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required as this is a protocol for a systematic review and no primary data are to be collected. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international meetings including Diabetes UK, European Association for the Study of Diabetes, American Diabetes Association and International Diabetes Federation conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020184820.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Hassan Hashemi ◽  
Farhad Rezvan ◽  
Reza Pakzad ◽  
Asal Ansaripour ◽  
Samira Heydarian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-35
Author(s):  
Edilson Leite de Moura ◽  
Ana Caroline Melo dos Santos ◽  
Denise Macedo da Silva ◽  
Bruna Brandão dos Santos ◽  
Diego de Siqueira Figueredo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-233
Author(s):  
Shan Lin ◽  
Yuanzheng Peng ◽  
Mengtao Cao ◽  
Ruiting Chen ◽  
Jiying Hu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document