scholarly journals The Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale (MAPS): Development and Psychometric Properties

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2136-2151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Parent ◽  
Rex Forehand
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigela Ahemaitijiang ◽  
Zhuo Rachel Han ◽  
Chelsea Dale ◽  
Karissa DiMarzio ◽  
Justin Parent

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigela Ahemaitijiang ◽  
Rachel Han ◽  
Chelsea Dale ◽  
Karissa DiMarzio ◽  
Justin Parent

Parenting practices have been linked to a wide range of issues related to children’s psychological adjustment; however, more research is warranted to further understand not only cultural variations of parenting norms, but also how such variations might differentially influence child outcomes. The current study examined the psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the Multidimensional Assessment of Parenting Scale (MAPS) in order to: 1) assess both positive and negative dimensions of parenting in Chinese-speaking societies, and 2) to explore the relationships between these practices and children’s psychopathological symptoms. A total of 2237 parents with children between 6-12 years old completed the MAPS, Interpersonal Mindfulness in Parenting Scale (IM-P), adapted Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), and other measures related to children’s psychosocial functioning. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed a clear six-factor structure. Results demonstrated adequate psychometric properties in terms of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. MAPS subscales also showed concurrent and convergent validity with mindful parenting, parent-child bonding, and children’s psychopathology outcomes. The importance of using culturally validated dimensional measures of parenting is discussed in this paper.


Author(s):  
Ana Matos ◽  
José Costa ◽  
Maria Pinheiro ◽  
Eliana Silva ◽  
Cristiana Marques

2018 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Machorrinho ◽  
Guida Veiga ◽  
Jorge Fernandes ◽  
Wolf Mehling ◽  
José Marmeleira

Interoceptive awareness involves several mind–body dimensions and can be evaluated by self-report with the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness (MAIA), which has been translated and validated in several countries and is being used in research and clinical contexts. This study systematically translated the MAIA with six additional items using a focus group and evaluated its psychometric properties in a respondent sample of 204 Portuguese university students (52% females; M = 21.3, SD = 3.9 years). Based on exploratory factor analysis, we refined the tool into a 33-item version and tested it in a separate sample ( n = 286; 63% females; M = 21.3, SD = 4.7 years). We then conducted confirmatory factor analysis and examined test–retest reliability and convergent and discriminant validity. We confirmed an acceptable model fit for this Portuguese version (MAIA-P) with 33 items and seven scales; it showed good construct validity and acceptable temporal reliability, The MAIA-P appears to be valuable for assessing self-reported interoceptive awareness in Portuguese healthy adults.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigela Ahemaitijiang ◽  
Zhuo Rachel Han ◽  
Chelsea Dale ◽  
Karissa DiMarzio ◽  
Justin Parent

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Brian K. Lo ◽  
Melissa L. McTernan ◽  
Jess Haines ◽  
Jennifer S. Savage ◽  
Kari C. Kugler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document