4D Non-uniformly sampled C,C-NOESY experiment for sequential assignment of 13C,15N-labeled RNAs

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Stanek ◽  
Peter Podbevšek ◽  
Wiktor Koźmiński ◽  
Janez Plavec ◽  
Mirko Cevec
Author(s):  
Alexey S. Kiryutin ◽  
Ivan V. Zhukov ◽  
Fabien Ferrage ◽  
G Bodenhausen ◽  
Alexandra V. Yurkovskaya ◽  
...  

A novel method dubbed ZULF-TOCSY results from the combination of Zero and Ultra-Low Field (ZULF) with high-field, high-resolution NMR, leading to a generalization of the concept of total correlation spectroscopy...


1984 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 471-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.Z Gurevich ◽  
I.L Barsukov ◽  
A.S Arseniev ◽  
V.F Bystrov
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
D. Wemmer

During the early 1980s there were two developments which lead to our studies of sequence specific DNA ligands. The first was the development of sequential assignment methods based on 2D NMR spectra which allowed complete assignment of resonances for proteins (Wüthrich, 1986). The assignments in turn allowed determination of many structural restraints through interpretation of NOESY crosspeaks and coupling constants from COSY type spectra. The second advance was the improvement of the chemistry for direct synthesis of DNA oligomers. With multimilligram samples of DNA oligomers available sequential assignment methods for DNA, paralleling those for proteins, were also worked out. Again with assignments came the possibility of determining DNA structures in solution. Howeverfor double stranded, Watson-Crick paired DNAs the structure can be reasonably approximated by the standard B-form model derived from fiber diffraction. The accurate determination of local conformational features has been somewhat difficult using NMR since tertiary contacts (as are so valuable in determining protein structures) do not occur. However with careful quantitative analysis some of the local details of structure can be determined. These NMR methods also offered the possibility of trying to understand the structural basis for binding of ligands to DNA oligomers. In order to make welldefined complexes we wanted to start with a compound that showed some sequence specificity in binding, and selected distamycin (shown below), a polypyrrole antibiotic which was known to have preference for binding to A-T rich DNA sequences. A close relative, netropsin, had been studied by Dinshaw Patel who showed that the binding is in the minor groove by identifying an NOE between a proton of the ligand and an adenosine H2 in the center of the minor groove (Patel, 1982). We began by making a complex with the self-complementary DNA oligomer: 5'-CGCGAATTCGCG-3', which had been studied extensively by X-- ray crystallography, and also by NMR. Distamycin did form a well-defined complex with this DNA, which was is slow exchange with free DNA during titrations (Klevit et al., 1986).


2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 943-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Golshid Baharian ◽  
Sheldon H. Jacobson

The stochastic sequential assignment problem assigns distinct workers to sequentially arriving tasks with stochastic parameters. In this paper the assignments are performed so as to minimize the threshold probability, which is the probability of the long-run reward per task failing to achieve a target value (threshold). As the number of tasks approaches infinity, the problem is studied for independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) tasks with a known distribution function and also for tasks that are derived from r distinct unobservable distributions (governed by a Markov chain). Stationary optimal policies are presented, which simultaneously minimize the threshold probability and achieve the optimal long-run expected reward per task.


2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-298
Author(s):  
Saurabh Saxena ◽  
Jan Stanek ◽  
Mirko Cevec ◽  
Janez Plavec ◽  
Wiktor Koźmiński

2000 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann E. Ferentz ◽  
Gerhard Wagner

1. Introduction 292. Landmarks in NMR of macromolecules 322.1 Protein structures and methods development 322.1.1 Sequential assignment method 322.1.2 Triple-resonance experiments 342.1.3 Structures of large proteins 362.2 Protein–nucleic acid complexes 372.3 RNA structures 382.4 Membrane-bound systems 393. NMR spectroscopy today 403.1 State-of-the-art structure determination 413.2 New methods 443.2.1 Residual dipolar couplings 443.2.2 Direct detection of hydrogen bonds 443.2.3 Spin labeling 453.2.4 Segmental labeling 463.3 Protein complexes 473.4 Mobility studies 503.5 Determination of time-dependent structures 523.6 Drug discovery 534. The future of NMR 544.1 The ease of structure determination 544.2 The ease of making recombinant protein 554.3 Post-translationally modified proteins 554.4 Approaches to large and/or membrane-bound proteins 564.5 NMR in structural genomics 564.6 Synergy of NMR and crystallography in protein structure determination 565. Conclusion 576. Acknowledgements 577. References 57Since the publication of the first complete solution structure of a protein in 1985 (Williamson et al. 1985), tremendous technological advances have brought nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to the forefront of structural biology. Innovations in magnet design, electronics, pulse sequences, data analysis, and computational methods have combined to make NMR an extremely powerful technique for studying biological macromolecules at atomic resolution (Clore & Gronenborn, 1998). Most recently, new labeling and pulse techniques have been developed that push the fundamental line-width limit for resolution in NMR spectroscopy, making it possible to obtain high-field spectra with better resolution than ever before (Dötsch & Wagner, 1998). These methods are facilitating the study of systems of ever-increasing complexity and molecular weight.


2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 477-485 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhonda Righter

We extend the classic sequential stochastic assignment problem to include arrivals of workers. When workers are all of the same type, we show that the socially optimal policy is the same as the individually optimal policy for which workers are given priority according to last come–first served. This result also holds under several variants in the model assumptions. When workers have different types, we show that the socially optimal policy is determined by thresholds such that more valuable jobs are given to more valuable workers, but now the individually optimal policy is no longer socially optimal. We also show that the overall value increases when worker or job values become more variable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document