Randomized trial of technology-assisted self-monitoring of blood glucose by low-income seniors: improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1001-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason C. Levine ◽  
Edith Burns ◽  
Jeffrey Whittle ◽  
Raymond Fleming ◽  
Paul Knudson ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (01) ◽  
pp. 027-033
Author(s):  
Ejiofor Ugwu ◽  
Ibrahim Gezawa ◽  
Olufunmilayo Adeleye

Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate if intensified self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) improves glycemic control in insulin-treated subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods:Ninety-six adults with stable but poorly controlled [glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level >7.5%] T2DM receiving twice-daily biphasic insulin were randomly assigned to either of the two groups: intensive monitors (IM) that performed SMBG at least twice daily or conventional monitors (CM) that performed SMBG at their discretionary frequency for 12 weeks. Demographic, clinical, and glycemic indices, including fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial glucose (PPG), and HbA1c, were compared at baseline and week 12. Results:A total of 71 subjects (25 IM and 46 CM) completed the study. Both groups had similar HbA1c at baseline. From baseline to week 12, the IM group had higher mean daily test strip usage (P <0.001), engaged in more frequent insulin dose adjustments (P <0.001), and attained greater daily insulin dosage (P = 0.002). All glycemic indices including FBG, PPG, and HbA1c improved significantly from baseline to week 12 in the IM but not in the CM group. HbA1c level declined by −1.2 ±0.4% in the IM group (P = 0.002). There was no difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia in both groups. The monthly cost of intensified SMBG was nearly four times that of conventional monitoring (P <0.001). Conclusion:Both short- and long-term glycemic control significantly improved by intensified SMBG in stable but poorly controlled insulin-treated adults with T2DM. Intensified SMBG enabled better self-titration of insulin and probably other self-care practices. This benefit, however, occurred at the expense of costs that may be difficult to sustain in resource-poor countries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-303
Author(s):  
Juan Sebastián Frías-Ordoñez ◽  
Clara Eugenia Pérez-Gualdrón

Introduction: Self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) has been considered a key element in the management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). However, its role in glycemic control in non-insulin users has been long discussed.Objective: To conduct a narrative literature review of the benefits of SMBG in non-insulin-treated patients with T2DM.Materials and Methods: A scientific literature search was conducted in the following databases: Pubmed, ScienceDirect, Embase, SciELO, Cochrane and Medline. Relevant articles were selected according to the established criteria. In addition, some studies included in the references of the initially selected articles were added to the review since they were considered relevant for its objective.Results: The following records were included in the review: 14 controlled clinical trials, 13 observational studies, 10 clinical practice guidelines, 7 narrative reviews, 5 meta-analyses, and 1 systematic review.Conclusion: based on the evidence found in this review it is possible to say that the use of SMBG in patients with T2DM is beneficial and that it has a positive impact on non-insulin users in terms of achieving glycemic control and defining therapeutic changes.


2011 ◽  
pp. P1-534-P1-534
Author(s):  
Bruno Madeo ◽  
Sara Scaltriti ◽  
Stefania Romano ◽  
Chiara Diazzi ◽  
El Goch Marwan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Uriëll L Malanda ◽  
Laura MC Welschen ◽  
Ingrid I Riphagen ◽  
Jacqueline M Dekker ◽  
Giel Nijpels ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document