Fractional matching preclusion number of graphs and the perfect matching polytope

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 915-932
Author(s):  
Ruizhi Lin ◽  
Heping Zhang
2014 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 1450025 ◽  
Author(s):  
XIUMEI WANG ◽  
WEIPING SHANG ◽  
YIXUN LIN ◽  
MARCELO H. CARVALHO

The perfect matching polytope of a graph G is the convex hull of the incidence vectors of all perfect matchings in G. This paper characterizes claw-free cubic graphs whose 1-skeleton graphs of perfect matching polytopes have diameter 1.


2009 ◽  
Vol 309 (16) ◽  
pp. 5017-5023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hong Bian ◽  
Fuji Zhang

Author(s):  
Chien-Chung Huang ◽  
Telikepalli Kavitha

Our input instance is a bipartite graph G where each vertex has a preference list ranking its neighbors in a strict order of preference. A matching M is popular if there is no matching N such that the number of vertices that prefer N to M outnumber those that prefer M to N. Each edge is associated with a utility and we consider the problem of matching vertices in a popular and utility-optimal manner. It is known that it is NP-hard to compute a max-utility popular matching. So we consider mixed matchings: a mixed matching is a probability distribution or a lottery over matchings. Our main result is that the popular fractional matching polytope PG is half-integral and in the special case where a stable matching in G is a perfect matching, this polytope is integral. This implies that there is always a max-utility popular mixed matching which is the average of two integral matchings. So in order to implement a max-utility popular mixed matching in G, we need just a single random bit. We analyze the popular fractional matching polytope whose description may have exponentially many constraints via an extended formulation with a linear number of constraints. The linear program that gives rise to this formulation has an unusual property: self-duality. The self-duality of this LP plays a crucial role in our proof. Our result implies that a max-utility popular half-integral matching in G and also in the roommates problem (where the input graph need not be bipartite) can be computed in polynomial time.


2004 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo H. de Carvalho ◽  
Cláudio L. Lucchesi ◽  
U.S.R. Murty

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document