perfect matching
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

354
(FIVE YEARS 106)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2022 ◽  
pp. 979-1012
Author(s):  
Per Austrin ◽  
Kilian Risse

Quantum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 611
Author(s):  
Seungbeom Chin ◽  
Yong-Su Kim ◽  
Sangmin Lee

The indistinguishability of quantum particles is widely used as a resource for the generation of entanglement. Linear quantum networks (LQNs), in which identical particles linearly evolve to arrive at multimode detectors, exploit the indistinguishability to generate various multipartite entangled states by the proper control of transformation operators. However, it is challenging to devise a suitable LQN that carries a specific entangled state or compute the possible entangled state in a given LQN as the particle and mode number increase. This research presents a mapping process of arbitrary LQNs to graphs, which provides a powerful tool for analyzing and designing LQNs to generate multipartite entanglement. We also introduce the perfect matching diagram (PM diagram), which is a refined directed graph that includes all the essential information on the entanglement generation by an LQN. The PM diagram furnishes rigorous criteria for the entanglement of an LQN and solid guidelines for designing suitable LQNs for the genuine entanglement. Based on the structure of PM diagrams, we compose LQNs for fundamental N-partite genuinely entangled states.


2021 ◽  
Vol vol. 23, no. 3 (Graph Theory) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hadi Alizadeh ◽  
Didem Gözüpek

A paired dominating set $P$ is a dominating set with the additional property that $P$ has a perfect matching. While the maximum cardainality of a minimal dominating set in a graph $G$ is called the upper domination number of $G$, denoted by $\Gamma(G)$, the maximum cardinality of a minimal paired dominating set in $G$ is called the upper paired domination number of $G$, denoted by $\Gamma_{pr}(G)$. By Henning and Pradhan (2019), we know that $\Gamma_{pr}(G)\leq 2\Gamma(G)$ for any graph $G$ without isolated vertices. We focus on the graphs satisfying the equality $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$. We give characterizations for two special graph classes: bipartite and unicyclic graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ by using the results of Ulatowski (2015). Besides, we study the graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ and a restricted girth. In this context, we provide two characterizations: one for graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ and girth at least 6 and the other for $C_3$-free cactus graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$. We also pose the characterization of the general case of $C_3$-free graphs with $\Gamma_{pr}(G)= 2\Gamma(G)$ as an open question.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rizwan ◽  
Akhlaq Ahmad Bhatti ◽  
Muhammad Javaid ◽  
Ebenezer Bonyah

A connected graph G V , E in which the number of edges is one more than its number of vertices is called a bicyclic graph. A perfect matching of a graph is a matching in which every vertex of the graph is incident to exactly one edge of the matching set such that the number of vertices is two times its matching number. In this paper, we investigated maximum and minimum values of variable sum exdeg index, SEI a for bicyclic graphs with perfect matching for k ≥ 5 and a > 1 .


2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 621-628
Author(s):  
Meysam Taheri-Dehkordi ◽  
◽  
Gholam Hossein Fath-Tabar

Fullerenes graphs are 3-connected, 3-regular planar graphs with faces including only pentagons and hexagons. If be a graph with a perfect matching, a subgraph H of G is a nice subgraph if G-V(H) has a perfect matching. In this paper, we show that in every fullerene graph arising from smaller fullerenes via chamfer transformation, each pair of pentagons is a nice subgraph.


2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 561-575
Author(s):  
Yutong Liu ◽  
◽  
Congcong Ma ◽  
Haiyuan Yao ◽  
Xu Wang

The forcing polynomial and anti-forcing polynomial are two important enumerative polynomials associated with all perfect matchings of a graph. In a graph with large order, the exhaustive enumeration which is used to compute forcing number of a given perfect matching is too time-consuming to compute anti-forcing number. In this paper, we come up with an efficient method — integer linear programming, to compute forcing number and anti-forcing number of a given perfect matching. As applications, we obtain the di-forcing polynomials C60 , C70 and C72 , and as a consequence, the forcing and anti-forcing polynomials of them are obtained.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2132 (1) ◽  
pp. 012033
Author(s):  
Bo Zhu ◽  
Shumin Zhang ◽  
Chenfu Ye

Abstract The fractional strong matching preclusion number of a graph is the minimum number of edges and vertices whose deletion leaves the resulting graph without a fractional perfect matching. In this paper, we obtain the fractional strong matching preclusion number for the Cartesian product of a graph and a cycle. As an application, the fractional strong matching preclusion number for torus networks is also obtained.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document