Assessing Knowledge, Physician Interactions and Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Arab Americans in Dearborn, Michigan

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 900-909
Author(s):  
Fatima Saad ◽  
Mariam Ayyash ◽  
Marwa Ayyash ◽  
Nadine Elhage ◽  
Iman Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Arab Americans ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 508-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Resa M. Jones ◽  
Kelly J. Devers ◽  
Anton J. Kuzel ◽  
Steven H. Woolf
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals The Relative Importance of Patient-Reported Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Resa M. Jones ◽  
Steven H. Woolf ◽  
Tina D. Cunningham ◽  
Robert E. Johnson ◽  
Alex H. Krist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Relative Importance ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Does patient time spent viewing computer-tailored colorectal cancer screening materials predict patient-reported discussion of screening with providers?

2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 555-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mechelle Sanders ◽  
Kevin Fiscella ◽  
Peter Veazie ◽  
James G. Dolan ◽  
Anthony Jerant
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Satisfaction and experience with colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review of validated patient reported outcome measures

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Selva ◽  
C. Selva ◽  
Y. Álvarez-Pérez ◽  
N. Torà ◽  
P. López ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening can determine adherence to screening programs. An evaluation of validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring experience or satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening does not exist. Our objective was to identify and critically appraise validated questionnaires for measuring patient satisfaction or experience with colorectal cancer screening. Methods We conducted a systematic review following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology. We conducted searches on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL and BiblioPRO and assessed the methodological quality of studies and measurement properties of questionnaires according to the COSMIN guidelines for systematic reviews of PROMs. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019118527. Results We included 80 studies that used 75 questionnaires, of which only 5 were validated. Four questionnaires measured satisfaction with endoscopy: two in the context of colorectal cancer screening (for colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy) and two for non-screening endoscopy. One questionnaire measured satisfaction with bowel preparation. The methodological quality of studies was variable. The questionnaires with evidence for sufficient content validity and internal consistency were: the CSSQP questionnaire, which measures safety and satisfaction with screening colonoscopy, and the Post-Procedure questionnaire which measures satisfaction with non-screening endoscopic procedures. Conclusions This systematic review shows that a minority of existing PROMs for measuring patient satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening are validated. We identified two questionnaires with high potential for further use (CSSQP and the Post-Procedure questionnaire).

scholarly journals Patient-Reported Needs Following a Referral for Colorectal Cancer Screening

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Dyer ◽  
Deirdre A. Shires ◽  
Susan A. Flocke ◽  
Sarah T. Hawley ◽  
Resa M. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals Perceptions of colorectal cancer screening in the Arab American community: a pilot study

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Alsayid ◽  
Nour Mazen Tlimat ◽  
Clarence Spigner ◽  
Christian Dimaano
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Focus Groups ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
Modern Medicine ◽  
Arab Americans ◽  
Health Access ◽  
Arab American

Abstract Objective: Multiple factors such as socioeconomic status (SES), education, race, and ethnicity can affect colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) rates. However, few studies have addressed CRCS disparities among Arab Americans. Our aim was to understand how Arab Americans view CRCS. Method: Employing thematic analysis, we collected and analyzed the dialogue of Arab American focus groups and interviews to better understand participants’ perceptions of CRCS. Themes were generated and categorized into barriers and facilitators. Results: Eleven Arab American males participated in two focus groups and two interviews. Three barriers included disbelief in modern medicine, concerns about the procedure, and lack of communication with the physician. Three facilitators were also identified: compliance and priority of health, access to healthcare, and awareness. Conclusion: Disparities in CRCS cannot solely be explained by SES and access but cultural differences also contribute. Specific interventions accounting for these cultural differences are needed to reduce disparities in CRCS among Arab Americans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document