Quantum state transformation by optimal projective measurements

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 507-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaoxiong Wang ◽  
Rebing Wu ◽  
Xin Chen ◽  
Yunjian Ge ◽  
Junhui Shi ◽  
...  
Quantum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Molina

Performing perfect/conclusive quantum state exclusion means to be able to discard with certainty at least one out ofnpossible quantum state preparations by performing a measurement of the resulting state. This task of state exclusion has recently been studied at length in \cite{bandyopadhyay2014conclusive}, and it is at the heart of the celebrated PBR thought experiment \cite{pusey2012reality}. When all the preparations correspond to pure states and there are no more of them than their common dimension, it is an open problem whether POVMs give any additional power for this task with respect to projective measurements. This is the case even for the simple case of three states in three dimensions, which is mentioned in \cite{caves2002conditions} as unsuccessfully tackled. In this paper, we give an analytical proof that in this case considering POVMs does indeed not give any additional power with respect to projective measurements. To do so, we first make without loss of generality some assumptions about the structure of an optimal POVM. The justification of these assumptions involves arguments based on convexity, rank and symmetry properties. We show then that any pure states perfectly excluded by such a POVM meet the conditions identified in \cite{caves2002conditions} for perfect exclusion by a projective measurement of three pure states in three dimensions. We also discuss possible generalizations of our work, including an application of Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Programming that might be of special interest.


2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 1850054 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Muthuganesan ◽  
R. Sankaranarayanan

In this paper, we introduce fidelity-based measurement-induced nonlocality for bipartite quantum state to capture the nonlocal effects due to two-sided von Neumann projective measurements. We identify that all the properties of this quantity are reflected from that of One-sided measurement. We compute this quantity for arbitrary pure and mixed bipartite states. As an illustration, we have studied the nonlocality of Bell diagonal state.


1998 ◽  
Vol 242 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 198-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci ◽  
B. Huttner ◽  
N. Gisin

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 332-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Clausen ◽  
M Dakna ◽  
L Knöll ◽  
D G Welsch

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 1650021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedetto Militello

A quantum system interacting with a repeatedly measured one turns out to be subjected to a non-unitary evolution which can force the former to a specific quantum state. It is shown that in the case where the repeatedly measured system is subjected to the action of its environment, the occurrence of a competition between the dissipation and the measurements can reduce the influence of the decay on the filtering process. Both theoretical predictions and numerical results are presented.


Entropy ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Abraham G. Kofman ◽  
Gershon Kurizki

The consensus regarding quantum measurements rests on two statements: (i) von Neumann’s standard quantum measurement theory leaves undetermined the basis in which observables are measured, and (ii) the environmental decoherence of the measuring device (the “meter”) unambiguously determines the measuring (“pointer”) basis. The latter statement means that the environment monitors (measures) selected observables of the meter and (indirectly) of the system. Equivalently, a measured quantum state must end up in one of the “pointer states” that persist in the presence of the environment. We find that, unless we restrict ourselves to projective measurements, decoherence does not necessarily determine the pointer basis of the meter. Namely, generalized measurements commonly allow the observer to choose from a multitude of alternative pointer bases that provide the same information on the observables, regardless of decoherence. By contrast, the measured observable does not depend on the pointer basis, whether in the presence or in the absence of decoherence. These results grant further support to our notion of Quantum Lamarckism, whereby the observer’s choices play an indispensable role in quantum mechanics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document