Mentor’s Self-Efficacy Trajectories During a Mentoring Program for At-Risk Adolescents

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 575-589
Author(s):  
Ashley A. Boat ◽  
Lindsey M. Weiler ◽  
Molly Bailey ◽  
Shelley Haddock ◽  
Kimberly Henry
2010 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amparo Escartí ◽  
Melchor Gutiérrez ◽  
Carmina Pascual ◽  
Diana Marín

This study evaluated improvement in self-efficacy and personal and social responsibility among at-risk of dropping-out of school adolescents participating in a program in which Hellison's Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model was applied in physical education classes during the course of an academic year. Thirty at-risk adolescents aged 13-14 years old (23 boys, 7 girls) were assigned to an intervention group (12 boys and 3 girls) or a comparison group (11 boys, 4 girls), the latter of which did not participate in the program. Quantitative results showed a significant improvement in the students' self-efficacy for enlisting social resources and in self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. Qualitative results showed an improvement in responsibility behaviors of participants in the intervention group. This suggests that the model could be effective for improving psychological and social development in at-risk adolescents, and that physical education classes may be an appropriate arena for working with these young people.


2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemaree Carroll ◽  
Kellie Gordon ◽  
Michele Haynes ◽  
Stephen Houghton

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Lauren Henry

The purpose this study was to examine the treatment effects of a research-based intervention for students in alternative education: The Motivational Interviewing with At-Risk Students (MARS) Mentoring Program. Specifically, treatment effects were expected to in social, emotional, behavioral, and academic performances. MARS Mentoring is a unique program founded in self efficacy strategies, specifically Motivational Interviewing paired with behavioral modification practices. The 10-week intervention was delivered school-wide to 48 students (grades K-12). Two behavioral alternative schools also participated in data collection, serving as non-intervention schools for comparison. Outcome measures included school disciplinary actions for students (out of school suspension, office discipline referrals, and minor classroom referrals), academic performance (Math and English grade means), student self-efficacy, and targeted protective factors for students in alternative settings (using the Alternative Education Tier-3 Assessment). Two sets of analyses are presented. First, unmanipulated data from one school receiving intervention and two non-intervention schools were evaluated using simple means comparisons. In addition, to control for potential sample bias, propensity score matching methods were employed using a nearest neighbor matching algorithm. Students receiving the MARS intervention demonstrated significant improvements in social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes by establishing consistent improvements across all data analytic methods. Preliminary results indicated significant academic improvements for students enrolled in MARS Mentoring, however the model did not support significance after propensity score matching. Further implication for practice and direction for future research based on the findings are discussed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document