scholarly journals Do specific forms of university-industry knowledge transfer have different impacts on the performance of private enterprises? An empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 504-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spyros Arvanitis ◽  
Nora Sydow ◽  
Martin Woerter
2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (9) ◽  
pp. 1863-1884
Author(s):  
Paolo Canonico ◽  
Ernesto De Nito ◽  
Vincenza Esposito ◽  
Mario Pezzillo Iacono ◽  
Gianluigi Mangia

PurposeIn this paper, we depart from extant conceptualisations of knowledge translation mechanisms to examine projects as a way to achieve effective knowledge transfer. Our empirical analysis focused on a university–industry research project in the automotive industry.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical analysis was based on a qualitative investigation. We analysed material collected within a research project involving a partnership between two universities and Fiat-Chrysler Automotive (FCA), a multi-brand auto manufacturer with a product range covering several different market segments. We used three data collection techniques: internal document analysis, participant observation and semi-structured interviews.FindingsOur findings show that, in a U-I research project, goals represent a key dimension to support knowledge translation. Defining the goal implies an ongoing negotiation process, where researchers and company employees work together, in order to converge towards a shared meaning of the goal. In this sense, goal orientation and goal-based interaction have significant implications for knowledge translation processes.Originality/valueStudies to date have focussed on the concept of knowledge translation as a way to contextualise the transfer from the source of knowledge to the receiver and to interpret the knowledge to be exchanged. This study expands the understanding of knowledge translation mechanisms in university–industry research settings. It investigates the concept of projects as powerful knowledge translation mechanism in a dynamic and longitudinal perspective. Our contribution provides insight, reflecting on how the use of projects may represent a way to facilitate knowledge transfer and build up new ideas and solutions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (8) ◽  
pp. 1725-1740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saqib Mehmood Afzal ◽  
Khawaja Farooq Ahmad ◽  
Muhammad Imran Qureshi ◽  
Khalid Zaman ◽  
Naila Khan

Author(s):  
Ainurul Rosli ◽  
Peter Robinson

This chapter looks into the importance of having a clear identity of a boundary spanner in determining the role of the partners in a university-industry knowledge transfer programme. It highlights issues around the relationship between the business and the graduate as the boundary spanner, where the university's level of control differs between two programmes: Knowledge Transfer Partnership (KTP) and Knowledge Exchange and Enterprise Network (KEEN) programme. The four case studies illustrate interesting points since the university is the employer for the KTPs associate and the business is the employer for the KEEN associate, whilst successful KTP and KEEN projects rely on a full understanding of the role of the graduate within the business.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quyen T. Dang ◽  
Pavlina Jasovska ◽  
Hussain Gulzar Rammal ◽  
Katie Schlenker

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Alexander ◽  
D. P. Martin ◽  
C. Manolchev ◽  
K. Miller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document