The Central Symmetry Analysis of Wrinkle Ridges in Lunar Mare Serenitatis

2018 ◽  
Vol 121 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 45-58
Author(s):  
Meijuan Yao ◽  
Jianping Chen
Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 566 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Muatjetjeja ◽  
S. O. Mbusi ◽  
A. R. Adem

In this paper we carry out a complete Noether symmetry analysis of a generalized coupled Lane-Emden-Klein-Gordon-Fock system with central symmetry. It is shown that several cases transpire for which the Noether symmetries exist. Moreover, we derive conservation laws connected with the admitted Noether symmetries. Furthermore, we fleetingly discuss the physical interpretation of the these conserved vectors.


Author(s):  
Alan Boyde ◽  
Milan Hadravský ◽  
Mojmír Petran ◽  
Timothy F. Watson ◽  
Sheila J. Jones ◽  
...  

The principles of tandem scanning reflected light microscopy and the design of recent instruments are fully described elsewhere and here only briefly. The illuminating light is intercepted by a rotating aperture disc which lies in the intermediate focal plane of a standard LM objective. This device provides an array of separate scanning beams which light up corresponding patches in the plane of focus more intensely than out of focus layers. Reflected light from these patches is imaged on to a matching array of apertures on the opposite side of the same aperture disc and which are scanning in the focal plane of the eyepiece. An arrangement of mirrors converts the central symmetry of the disc into congruency, so that the array of apertures which chop the illuminating beam is identical with the array on the observation side. Thus both illumination and “detection” are scanned in tandem, giving rise to the name Tandem Scanning Microscope (TSM). The apertures are arranged on Archimedean spirals: each opposed pair scans a single line in the image.


1994 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 1341-1352
Author(s):  
J. M. Perez-Mato ◽  
L. Elcoro

Vestnik MEI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
Pavel S. Gribov ◽  
◽  
Maria A. Gribova ◽  
Aleksandr Yu. Shatilov ◽  
◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Papike ◽  
G. W. Fowler ◽  
C. T. Adcock ◽  
C. K. Shearer
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jason Albright ◽  
James D. McHardy ◽  
Scott D. Ramsey ◽  
Joseph H. Schmidt

2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keigo Hongo ◽  
Hiroaki Toh ◽  
Atsushi Kumamoto

Abstract Site-dependent bulk permittivities of the lunar uppermost media with thicknesses of tens to hundreds meters were estimated based on the data from Lunar Radar Sounder onboard the Selenological and Engineering Explorer (SELENE). It succeeded in sounding almost all over the Moon’s surface in a frequency range around 5 MHz to detect subsurface reflectors beneath several lunar maria. However, it is necessary to estimate the permittivity of the surface regolith of the Moon in order to determine the actual depths to those reflectors instead of apparent depths assuming a speed of light in the vacuum. In this study, we determined site-dependent bulk permittivities by two-layer models consisting of a surface regolith layer over a half-space with uniform, but different physical properties from the layer above. Those models consider the electrical conductivity as well as the permittivity, whose trade-off was resolved by utilizing the correlation between iron–titanium content and measured physical properties of lunar rock samples. Distribution of the iron–titanium content on the Moon’s surface had already been derived by spectroscopic observation from SELENE as well. Four lunar maria, Mare Serenitatis, Oceanus Procellarum, Mare Imbrium, and Mare Crisium, were selected as regions of evident reflectors, where we estimated the following four physical properties of each layer, i.e., bulk permittivity, porosity, loss tangent and electrical conductivity to conclude the actual depths of the reflectors are approximately 200 m on average. The bulk permittivity ranges from 2.96 at Mare Imbrium to 6.37 at Oceanus Procellarum, whereas the porosity takes the values between 1.8 and 41.1% in the respective maria. It was found that although the bulk permittivity of the four lunar maria differs from a mare to a mare, it shows a good correlation with their composition, viz., their iron–titanium content.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document