A term normalization method for efficient knowledge acquisition through text processing

2012 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myunggwon Hwang ◽  
Do-Heon Jeong ◽  
Jinhyung Kim ◽  
Sa-Kwang Song ◽  
Hanmin Jung ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Valery A. Mishlanov ◽  
◽  
Liudmila А. Kadzhaya ◽  
Vladimir A. Salimovskiy ◽  
Ivan V. Smirnov ◽  
...  

This paper discusses the issues of improving a predicate word dictionary structure that is used in solving problems of knowledge acquisition and text analysis. The principle of open dictionary architecture is shown. It takes into account the stylistic differentiation of speech and involves the description of predicate word subsystems functioning in separate speech varieties.


2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hines ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel ◽  
Melissa Guynn

Author(s):  
Kjell Ohlsson ◽  
Lars-Goeran Nilsson ◽  
Jerker Roennberg
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Collins ◽  
Betty Ann Levy
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch ◽  
Robert F. Lorch ◽  
Jonathan M. Golding
Keyword(s):  

1998 ◽  
Vol 37 (04/05) ◽  
pp. 327-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Buekens ◽  
G. De Moor ◽  
A. Waagmeester ◽  
W. Ceusters

AbstractNatural language understanding systems have to exploit various kinds of knowledge in order to represent the meaning behind texts. Getting this knowledge in place is often such a huge enterprise that it is tempting to look for systems that can discover such knowledge automatically. We describe how the distinction between conceptual and linguistic semantics may assist in reaching this objective, provided that distinguishing between them is not done too rigorously. We present several examples to support this view and argue that in a multilingual environment, linguistic ontologies should be designed as interfaces between domain conceptualizations and linguistic knowledge bases.


1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
pp. 261-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Schromm ◽  
T. Frankewitsch ◽  
M. Giehl ◽  
F. Keller ◽  
D. Zellner

Abstract:A pharmacokinetic database was constructed that is as free of errors as possible. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the literature using a text-processing system and a database system. A random data sample from each system was compared with the original literature. The estimated error frequencies using statistical methods differed significantly between the two systems. The estimated error frequency in the text-processing system was 7.2%, that in the database system 2.7%. Compared with the original values in the literature, the estimated probability of error for identical pharmacokinetic parameters recorded in both systems is 2.4% and is not significantly different from the error frequency in the database. Parallel data entry with a text-processing system and a database system is, therefore, not significantly better than structured data entry for reducing the error frequency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document