Regulation of c-Fos gene expression in the rat olfactory bulb during olfactory learning

2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 697-704 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. A. Solov’eva ◽  
L. V. Lagutina ◽  
L. V. Antonova ◽  
K. V. Anokhin
2010 ◽  
Vol 1352 ◽  
pp. 108-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ambigapathy Ganesh ◽  
Wieslaw Bogdanowicz ◽  
Moritz Haupt ◽  
Ganapathy Marimuthu ◽  
Koilmani Emmanuvel Rajan

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3909
Author(s):  
Melissa S. Totten ◽  
Derek M. Pierce ◽  
Keith M. Erikson

The aim of this study was to determine the impact of diet-induced obesity (DIO) on trace element homeostasis and gene expression in the olfactory bulb and to identify potential interaction effects between diet, sex, and strain. Our study is based on evidence that obesity and olfactory bulb impairments are linked to neurodegenerative processes. Briefly, C57BL/6J (B6J) and DBA/2J (D2J) male and female mice were fed either a low-fat diet or a high-fat diet for 16 weeks. Brain tissue was then evaluated for iron, manganese, copper, and zinc concentrations and mRNA gene expression. There was a statistically significant diet-by-sex interaction for iron and a three-way interaction between diet, sex, and strain for zinc in the olfactory bulb. Obese male B6J mice had a striking 75% increase in iron and a 50% increase in manganese compared with the control. There was an increase in zinc due to DIO in B6J males and D2J females, but a decrease in zinc in B6J females and D2J males. Obese male D2J mice had significantly upregulated mRNA gene expression for divalent metal transporter 1, alpha-synuclein, amyloid precursor protein, dopamine receptor D2, and tyrosine hydroxylase. B6J females with DIO had significantly upregulated brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression. Our results demonstrate that DIO has the potential to disrupt trace element homeostasis and mRNA gene expression in the olfactory bulb, with effects that depend on sex and genetics. We found that DIO led to alterations in iron and manganese predominantly in male B6J mice, and gene expression dysregulation mainly in male D2J mice. These results have important implications for health outcomes related to obesity with possible connections to neurodegenerative disease.


Neuroscience ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 170 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. Zhang ◽  
F. Okutani ◽  
G.Z. Huang ◽  
M. Taniguchi ◽  
Y. Murata ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 819-833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideto Kaba

Abstract This review examines the organizational principles underlying olfactory learning in three specialized contexts that occur during sensitive periods of enhanced neural plasticity and emphasizes some of their common features. All three forms of olfactory learning are associated with neural changes in the olfactory bulb (OB) at the first stage of sensory processing. These changes require the association of the olfactory and somatosensory signals in the OB. They all depend on somatosensory stimulation- induced release of noradrenaline that induces structural and functional changes at mitral-granule cell reciprocal synapses in the OB, resulting in increases in inhibitory transmission. In the accessory olfactory bulb, this represents the enhanced self-inhibition of mitral cells, which selectively disrupts the transmission of the mating male's pregnancy-blocking signal at this level. In contrast, an extensive network of secondary dendrites of mitral cells in the main olfactory bulb probably results in a sharpening of the odor-induced pattern of activity, due to increases in lateral inhibition, leading to offspring recognition in sheep and neonatal learning in rats and rabbits. These findings show that inhibitory interneurons play a critical role in olfactory learning. Further work on how these neurons shape olfactory circuit function could provide important clues to understand memory functions of interneurons in other systems. Moreover, recent research has suggested that three forms of olfactory learning are controlled by synergistic, redundant, and distributed neural mechanisms. This has general implications regarding the mechanisms that may contribute to the robustness of memories.


1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.M. Sullivan ◽  
D.R. Zyzak ◽  
P. Skierkowski ◽  
D.A. Wilson

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Guo ◽  
Zilong Wang ◽  
You Li ◽  
Guifeng Wei ◽  
Jiao Yuan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document