scholarly journals Model-Free Deep Inverse Reinforcement Learning by Logistic Regression

2017 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 891-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eiji Uchibe
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Inverse Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Model Free

scholarly journals Dealing with multiple experts and non-stationarity in inverse reinforcement learning: an application to real-life problems

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amarildo Likmeta ◽  
Alberto Maria Metelli ◽  
Giorgia Ramponi ◽  
Andrea Tirinzoni ◽  
Matteo Giuliani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Real World ◽  
Real Life ◽  
User Preferences ◽  
Inverse Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Water Release ◽  
Reward Function ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Conflicting Objectives ◽  
Multiple Experts

AbstractIn real-world applications, inferring the intentions of expert agents (e.g., human operators) can be fundamental to understand how possibly conflicting objectives are managed, helping to interpret the demonstrated behavior. In this paper, we discuss how inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) can be employed to retrieve the reward function implicitly optimized by expert agents acting in real applications. Scaling IRL to real-world cases has proved challenging as typically only a fixed dataset of demonstrations is available and further interactions with the environment are not allowed. For this reason, we resort to a class of truly batch model-free IRL algorithms and we present three application scenarios: (1) the high-level decision-making problem in the highway driving scenario, and (2) inferring the user preferences in a social network (Twitter), and (3) the management of the water release in the Como Lake. For each of these scenarios, we provide formalization, experiments and a discussion to interpret the obtained results.

On the use of the policy gradient and Hessian in inverse reinforcement learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-150
Author(s):  
Alberto Maria Metelli ◽  
Matteo Pirotta ◽  
Marcello Restelli
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Sequential Decision ◽  
Inverse Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Reward Function ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Learning Speed ◽  
Policy Gradient ◽  
Continuous Domains ◽  
Learning Policies ◽  
Finite Domains

Reinforcement Learning (RL) is an effective approach to solve sequential decision making problems when the environment is equipped with a reward function to evaluate the agent’s actions. However, there are several domains in which a reward function is not available and difficult to estimate. When samples of expert agents are available, Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) allows recovering a reward function that explains the demonstrated behavior. Most of the classic IRL methods, in addition to expert’s demonstrations, require sampling the environment to evaluate each reward function, that, in turn, is built starting from a set of engineered features. This paper is about a novel model-free IRL approach that does not require to specify a function space where to search for the expert’s reward function. Leveraging on the fact that the policy gradient needs to be zero for an optimal policy, the algorithm generates an approximation space for the reward function, in which a reward is singled out employing a second-order criterion. After introducing our approach for finite domains, we extend it to continuous ones. The empirical results, on both finite and continuous domains, show that the reward function recovered by our algorithm allows learning policies that outperform those obtained with the true reward function, in terms of learning speed.

scholarly journals Model-Free IRL Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 3951-3958
Author(s):  
Vinamra Jain ◽  
Prashant Doshi ◽  
Bikramjit Banerjee
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Likelihood Estimation ◽  
Transition Function ◽  
Inverse Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Q Learning ◽  
Reward Function ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Model Free Approach ◽  
Q Function

The problem of learning an expert’s unknown reward function using a limited number of demonstrations recorded from the expert’s behavior is investigated in the area of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL). To gain traction in this challenging and underconstrained problem, IRL methods predominantly represent the reward function of the expert as a linear combination of known features. Most of the existing IRL algorithms either assume the availability of a transition function or provide a complex and inefficient approach to learn it. In this paper, we present a model-free approach to IRL, which casts IRL in the maximum likelihood framework. We present modifications of the model-free Q-learning that replace its maximization to allow computing the gradient of the Q-function. We use gradient ascent to update the feature weights to maximize the likelihood of expert’s trajectories. We demonstrate on two problem domains that our approach improves the likelihood compared to previous methods.

Ensemble Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Semi-Expert Agents

2017 ◽  
Vol 137 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-673
Author(s):  
Shinji Tomita ◽  
Fumiya Hamatsu ◽  
Tomoki Hamagami
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Teaching AI Agents Ethical Values Using Reinforcement Learning and Policy Orchestration

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ritesh Noothigattu ◽  
Djallel Bouneffouf ◽  
Nicholas Mattei ◽  
Rachita Chandra ◽  
Piyush Madan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Ethical Values ◽  
Large Role ◽  
Learning To Learn ◽  
Inverse Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Time Step ◽  
Novel Approach

Autonomous cyber-physical agents play an increasingly large role in our lives. To ensure that they behave in ways aligned with the values of society, we must develop techniques that allow these agents to not only maximize their reward in an environment, but also to learn and follow the implicit constraints of society. We detail a novel approach that uses inverse reinforcement learning to learn a set of unspecified constraints from demonstrations and reinforcement learning to learn to maximize environmental rewards. A contextual bandit-based orchestrator then picks between the two policies: constraint-based and environment reward-based. The contextual bandit orchestrator allows the agent to mix policies in novel ways, taking the best actions from either a reward-maximizing or constrained policy. In addition, the orchestrator is transparent on which policy is being employed at each time step. We test our algorithms using Pac-Man and show that the agent is able to learn to act optimally, act within the demonstrated constraints, and mix these two functions in complex ways.

Model-Based and Model-Free Social Cognition

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leor M Hackel ◽  
Jeffrey Jordan Berg ◽  
Björn Lindström ◽  
David Amodio
Keyword(s):  
Reinforcement Learning ◽  
Social Cognition ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Memory Systems ◽  
Learning Task ◽  
Financial Advisors ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Systems Model ◽  
Task Assessment

Do habits play a role in our social impressions? To investigate the contribution of habits to the formation of social attitudes, we examined the roles of model-free and model-based reinforcement learning in social interactions—computations linked in past work to habit and planning, respectively. Participants in this study learned about novel individuals in a sequential reinforcement learning paradigm, choosing financial advisors who led them to high- or low-paying stocks. Results indicated that participants relied on both model-based and model-free learning, such that each independently predicted choice during the learning task and self-reported liking in a post-task assessment. Specifically, participants liked advisors who could provide large future rewards as well as advisors who had provided them with large rewards in the past. Moreover, participants varied in their use of model-based and model-free learning strategies, and this individual difference influenced the way in which learning related to self-reported attitudes: among participants who relied more on model-free learning, model-free social learning related more to post-task attitudes. We discuss implications for attitudes, trait impressions, and social behavior, as well as the role of habits in a memory systems model of social cognition.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document