A Meta-Analysis of Neuropsychological Predictors of Outcome Following Stroke and Other Non-Traumatic Acquired Brain Injuries in Adults

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-223
Author(s):  
Prue A. Watson ◽  
Gilles E. Gignac ◽  
Michael Weinborn ◽  
Sarah Green ◽  
Carmela Pestell
2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Allanson ◽  
Carmela Pestell ◽  
Gilles E. Gignac ◽  
Yong Xiang Yeo ◽  
Michael Weinborn

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 645-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Hassan ◽  
Mohamed Gadallah ◽  
Rachel M Mercer ◽  
Elinor Harriss ◽  
Najib M. Rahman

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Wang ◽  
Mingwei Sun ◽  
Hua Jiang ◽  
Xiao-ping Cao ◽  
Jun Zeng

Abstract Background We aimed to systematically review the efficacy of mannitol (MTL) on patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods Databases such as PubMed (US National Library of Medicine), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 3), ISI (Web of Science: Science Citation Index Expanded), Chinese Biomedicine Database (CBM), and China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI) have been searched for relevant studies published between 1 January 2003 and 1 October 2014. We have established inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify RCTs, which were suitable to be enrolled in the systematic review. The comparison group could be hypertonic saline (HS), hydroxyethyl starch, or others. The quality assessment was based on the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 and modified Jadad score scale. The major outcome was mortality, followed by the secondary outcomes such as neurological outcome, days on intensive care unit (ICU), and ventilator day. In addition, intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were used as the surrogate endpoints. Data synthesis and meta-analysis was conducted by using R (version 3.7-0.). Results When 176 potential relevant literatures and abstracts have been screened, four RCTs met all the inclusion criteria and were enrolled for the meta-analysis. Amongst all the enrolled studies, two trials have provided the primary outcome data. There was no heterogeneity between two studies (I2 = 0 %) and a fixed model was used for meta-analysis (n = 53), pooled result indicated that the mortality was similar in mannitol intervention and control treatment, OR = 0.80, 95 % CI [0.27, 2.37], P = 0.38. We found that both mannitol and HS were efficient in decreasing the ICP. Furthermore, the effect of the HS on the ICP appeared to be more effective in the patients with diffuse brain injuries than mannitol did. Conclusions As a conclusion, the mannitol therapy cannot reduce the mortality risk of acute severe traumatic brain injury. Current evidence does not support the mannitol as an effective treatment of acute severe traumatic brain injury. The well-designed randomized controlled trials are in urgent need to demonstrate the adoption of mannitol to acute severe traumatic brain injury.


2019 ◽  
Vol 126 ◽  
pp. e699-e705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khursheed Alam Khan ◽  
Madhur Choudhary ◽  
Virendra D. Sinha ◽  
Nandkishore Gora ◽  
Mohan Bairwa

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 262-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
HEATHER G. BELANGER ◽  
ERIC SPIEGEL ◽  
RODNEY D. VANDERPLOEG

AbstractDebate continues about the long-term neuropsychological impact of multiple mild traumatic brain injuries (MTBI). A meta-analysis of the relevant literature was conducted to determine the impact of having a history of more than one self-reported MTBI (versus just one MTBI) across seven cognitive domains, as well as symptom complaints. The analysis was based on 8 studies, all conducted with athletes, involving 614 cases of multiple MTBI and 926 control cases of a single MTBI. The overall effect of multiple MTBI on neuropsychological functioning was minimal and not significant (d = 0.06). However, follow-up analyses revealed that multiple self-reported MTBI was associated with poorer performance on measures of delayed memory and executive functioning. The implications and limitations of these findings are discussed. (JINS, 2010, 16, 262–267.)


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document