The extended, transnasal, transsphenoidal approach for anterior skull base meningioma: considerations in patient selection

Pituitary ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 561-568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph P. Castlen ◽  
David J. Cote ◽  
Hasan A. Zaidi ◽  
Edward R. Laws
Author(s):  
Bhawan Nangarwal ◽  
Jaskaran Singh Gosal ◽  
Kuntal Kanti Das ◽  
Deepak Khatri ◽  
Kamlesh Singh Bhaisora ◽  
...  

Background: Endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) and keyhole transcranial approaches are being increasingly used in anterior skull base meningioma (ASBM) surgery. Objective: We compare tumor resection rates and complication profiles of EEA and supraorbital key hole approach (SOKHA) against conventional transcranial approaches (TCA). Methods: Fifty-four patients with ASBM [olfactory groove (OGM), n=19 and planum sphenoidale/tuberculum sellae (PS/TSM), n=35) operated at a single centre over 7 years were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The overall rate of GTR was higher in OGM (15/19, 78.9%) than PS-TSM group (23/35, 65.7%, p=0.37). GTR rate with OGM was 90% and 75% with TCA and EEA. Death (n=1) following medical complication (TCA) and CSF leak requiring re-exploration (n=2, one each in TCA and EEA) accounted for the major complications in OGM. For the PS/TSM group, the GTR rates were 73.3% (n=11/15), 53.8% (n=7/13) and 71.4% (n=5/7) with TCA, EEA and SOKHA respectively. Seven patients (20%) of PS-TSM developed major postoperative complications including 4 deaths (one each in TCA, SOKHA and 2 in EEA group) and 3 visual deteriorations. Direct and indirect vascular complications were common in lesser invasive approaches to PS-TSM especially if the tumor has encased intracranial arteries. Conclusions: No single approach is applicable to all ASBMs. TCA is still the best approach to obtain GTR but has tissue trauma related problems. SOKHA may be a good alternative to TCA in selected PS-TSMs while EEA may be an alternate option in some OGMs. A meticulous patient selection is needed to derive reported results of EEA for PS-TSM.


Author(s):  
Jason Yuen ◽  
Arif Janjua ◽  
Peter Gooderham ◽  
Vinay Varadarajan ◽  
Samiul Muquit

2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hisaharu Goto ◽  
Takahumi Nishizaki ◽  
Koji Kajiwara ◽  
Yoshinori Ohmoto ◽  
Tatsuo Akimura ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 79 (S 04) ◽  
pp. S300-S310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federica Guaraldi ◽  
Ernesto Pasquini ◽  
Giorgio Frank ◽  
Diego Mazzatenta ◽  
Matteo Zoli

Introduction The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) might seem an “unnatural” route for intradural lesions such as meningiomas. The aim of this study is to critically revise our management of anterior skull base meningiomas to consider, in what cases it may be advantageous. Material and Methods Each consecutive case of anterior skull base meningioma operated on through an EEA or combined endoscopic–transcranial approach at our institution, between 2003 and 2017, have been included. Tumors were classified on the basis of their location and intra or extracranial extension. Follow-up consisted of an MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and a clinical examination 3 months after the surgery and then repeated annually. Results Fifty-seven patients were included. The most common location was the tuberculum sellae (62%), followed by olfactory groove (14%), planum sphenoidale (12%), and frontal sinus (12%). Among these, 65% were intracranial, 7% were extracranial, and 28% both intra and extracranial. Radical removal was achieved in 44 cases (77%). Complications consisted in 10 CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) leaks (17.6%), 1 overpacking (1.7%), and 1 asymptomatic brain ischemia (1.7%). Visual acuity and campimetric deficits improved respectively in 67 and 76% of patients. Recurrence rate was of 14%. Conclusions EEA presents many advantages in selected cases of anterior skull base meningioma. However, it is hampered by the relevant risk of CSF leak. We consider that it could be advantageous for planum/tuberculum sellae tumors. Conversely, for olfactory groove or frontal sinus meningiomas, it can be indicated for tumors with extracranial extension, while its role is still debatable for purely intracranial forms as considering our surgical results, it could be advantageous for midline planum/tuberculum sellae tumors. Conversely, it can be of first choice for olfactory groove or frontal sinus meningiomas with extracranial extension, while its role for purely intracranial forms is still debatable.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Z. Sun ◽  
Justin P. McCormick ◽  
Morcos N. Nakhla ◽  
Reza Kianian ◽  
Emmanuel G. Villalpando ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document