scholarly journals The Prevalence of Evidence-based Drug Use Prevention Curricula in U.S. Middle Schools in 2008

2010 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ringwalt ◽  
Amy A. Vincus ◽  
Sean Hanley ◽  
Susan T. Ennett ◽  
J. Michael Bowling ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ringwalt ◽  
Amy A. Vincus ◽  
Sean Hanley ◽  
Susan T. Ennett ◽  
J. Michael Bowling ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zila M. Sanchez ◽  
Adriana Sanudo ◽  
Solange Andreoni ◽  
Daniela Schneider ◽  
Ana Paula D. Pereira ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-217
Author(s):  
Blaine Stothard

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the content of the strategy and assess its claims to be evidence based. Design/methodology/approach This study is a close-reading of the text with commentary on specific content and reference to wider contexts. Findings The strategy makes use of evidence in its sections on treatment. Much evidence, including that of the UK ACMD, is dismissed or ignored. The issue of funding in times of austerity is not considered in the strategy. The range and complexity of drug use and users are not fully considered. Research limitations/implications The strategy can be seen as an idealised ambition with little basis in reality without funding to support its aims. Social implications There is no consideration of the impact of macro-economic policy on the extent of drug misuse. Originality/value Other commentaries on the strategy are emerging. This paper is a more extensive consideration than has so far appeared.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Robertson ◽  
Harold I. Perl ◽  
Eve E. Reider ◽  
Belinda E. Sims ◽  
Aria D. Crump ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Use ◽  

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 581-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Revathy Kumar ◽  
Patrick M. O’Malley ◽  
Lloyd D. Johnston ◽  
Virginia B. Laetz

Author(s):  
Stuart A. Kinner ◽  
Josiah D. Rich

Drug use and crime seem inextricably linked. Law enforcement responses to drug use tend to funnel people who use drugs into the criminal justice system rather than treatment, and those drug users who are imprisoned often have multiple, co-occurring mental health problems and/or suffer from infectious diseases including HIV, hepatitis C, and tuberculosis. Prisons provide a rare but regrettable opportunity to identify and respond to these needs, but correctional policies with respect to drug use and related harms often diverge from the evidence. Where such responses are evidence-based, they are rarely delivered at scale. Drug use in prison remains common and, in the absence of evidence-based harm reduction measures, is high risk. Relapse to drug use after release from prison is normative, such that incarceration can at best be conceived of as an interruption in drug use. People released from prison are at markedly increased risk of drug-related harms including fatal drug overdose and preventable hospitalisation, and are at increased risk of reincarceration. Greater investment in independent, rigorous research on the epidemiology of substance use and related harms in people who cycle through prisons, and a renewed commitment to aligning correctional policy and practice with the evidence, will have measurable benefits for public health, public safety, and the public purse.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document