scholarly journals Using an implementation science approach to implement and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) initiatives in routine care settings

Author(s):  
Angela M. Stover ◽  
◽  
Lotte Haverman ◽  
Hedy A. van Oers ◽  
Joanne Greenhalgh ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 452-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo F. Recinos ◽  
Cheryl J. Dunphy ◽  
Nicolas Thompson ◽  
Jesse Schuschu ◽  
John L. Urchek ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Natasha A. Roberts ◽  
◽  
Monika Janda ◽  
Angela M. Stover ◽  
Kimberly E. Alexander ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose We evaluated the utility of the implementation science framework “Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services” (i-PARIHS) for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into a medical oncology outpatient department. The i-PARIHS framework identifies four core constructs for implementation, including Facilitation, Innovation, Context and Recipients. Methods A pilot study used the i-PARIHS framework to identify PROM implementation barriers and enablers to inform facilitation support strategies, such as training clinicians and staff, workflow support, technical support and audit and feedback. Pre- and post-implementation surveys were completed by 83 and 72 staff, respectively, (nurses, doctors and allied health), to assess perceived knowledge, enablers, barriers and utility of PROMs; and acceptability of the PROM intervention was also assessed post-implementation. Results Important barriers included time constraints and previous experiences with technology. Enablers included good leadership support and a culture of learning. Facilitation strategies were used to overcome barriers identified in the i-PARIHS core domains. Compared to before the intervention, staff surveys showed improvement in perceived usefulness, perceived understanding and interpretation skills for PROMs. Staff perceptions about lack of time to use PROMs during visits remained a major perceived barrier post-implementation. Conclusion The i-PARIHS framework was useful for guiding the implementation of PROMs in routine oncology care. The four core i-PARIHS constructs (Facilitation, Innovation, Context and Recipients) identified factors that directly impacted implementation, with Facilitation having a particularly important role to overcome these barriers. Oncology clinics and health systems considering implementing PROMs should consider having a dedicated Facilitator available during PROM implementation.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Scholle ◽  
Suzanne Morton ◽  
Daren Anderson ◽  
David Kendrick ◽  
Juell Homco ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine N van der Veer ◽  
Cecile Couchoud ◽  
Rachael L Morton

ABSTRACT In this issue of Clinical Kidney Journal, Van der Willik et al. report findings from a pilot study where they introduced collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into routine kidney care in Dutch dialysis centres. It is comparable to a registry-led PROMs initiative in Sweden, published in Clinical Kidney Journal in 2020. Both studies reported low average PROMs response rates with substantial between-centre variation, and both identified suboptimal patient and staff engagement as a key barrier to implementing PROMs in routine care for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This suggests that national kidney registries could be well placed to facilitate large-scale collection of PROMs data, but that they may require additional guidance on how to do this successfully. In this editorial, we discuss the current state-of-play of PROMs collection by kidney registries and provide an overview of what is (un)known about the feasibility and effectiveness of PROMs in CKD and other conditions. We anticipate that the fast-growing evidence base on whether, and how, PROMs can be of value in CKD settings will expedite registry-based PROMs collection, which will ultimately lead to more valuable and person-centred services and to enhanced health and well-being of people with CKD.


Spine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 434-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Merrill ◽  
Lukas P. Zebala ◽  
Colleen Peters ◽  
Sheeraz A. Qureshi ◽  
Steven J. McAnany

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document