Letter names, letter sounds and phonological awareness: an examination of kindergarten children across letters and of letters across children

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 959-989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann Evans ◽  
Michelle Bell ◽  
Deborah Shaw ◽  
Shelley Moretti ◽  
Jodi Page
2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Treiman

Learning to read and write in English requires children to master the alphabetic principle, the idea that the letters in printed words represent the sounds in spoken words in a more or less regular manner. Children need at least two skills in order to grasp the alphabetic principle. The first is phonological awareness, or a sensitivity to the sound structure of spoken words. The second is knowledge about letters, including knowledge of letter names and knowledge of letter sounds. Recent research sheds light on these foundational skills, documenting the linguistic factors that affect children's performance and how children put their phonological skills and knowledge of letters to use in learning to read and spell.


2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine McBride-Chang ◽  
Rebecca Treiman

We examined the extent to which young Hong Kong Chinese children, taught to read English as a second language via a logographic “look and say” method, used information about letter names and letter sounds to learn English words. Forty children from each of three kindergarten grade levels (mean ages 3.8, 5.0, and 5.9 years old, respectively) were taught to pronounce novel English spellings that were based on letter-name (e.g., DK = Deke), letter-sound (DK = Dick), or visual (DK = Jean) cues. By the 2nd year of kindergarten, children performed significantly better in the name condition than the other conditions. The 3rd-year kindergartners performed better in the sound condition than the visual condition as well. The results point to the importance of letter-name and letter-sound knowledge for learning to read English, regardless of native-language background or method of instruction.


2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 860-873 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Treiman ◽  
Lia Sotak ◽  
Margo Bowman
Keyword(s):  

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 605-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margarida Alves Martins ◽  
Cristina Silva

1981 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. Kincaid ◽  
Paul Weisberg ◽  
Edward V. Sims

In two separate studies, specialized tokens were employed as instructional materials to teach 12 colors to preschool children and 14 letter-sounds to kindergarten children. These children were given initially 24 to 30 tokens and given an opportunity to “purchase” various items by recognizing the designated information on each token. Independent probe sessions showed attainment of high levels of recognition for both colors and sounds. Labeling of the instructional stimuli, although not explicitly trained, developed spontaneously, probably as a result of the children's hearing the labels during recognition training and using them in extra-classroom settings.


1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darlene M. Tangel ◽  
Benita A. Blachman

The purpose of this study was to determine if children trained in phoneme awareness in kindergarten would differ in invented spelling from children who did not have this training. A reliable scoring system was created to evaluate the invented spelling of the kindergarten children. The children were selected from 18, all-day kindergartens in four, demographically comparable low-income, inner-city schools. Prior to the intervention, the 77 treatment children and the 72 control children did not differ in age, sex, race, PPVT-R, phoneme segmentation, letter name and letter sound knowledge, or word recognition. During March, April, and May of the kindergarten year, treatment children participated in an 11-week phoneme awareness intervention that included instruction in letter names and sounds. After the intervention, the treatment children significantly outperformed the control children in phoneme segmentation, letter name and sound knowledge, and reading phonetically regular words and nonwords. Of primary interest in this study is the fact that the treatment children produced invented spellings that were rated developmentally superior to those of the control children. The 7-point scale created for scoring the developmental spelling test was found to be highly reliable using either correlation ( r = .98) or percent of agreement (93%).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document