scholarly journals Examining the independent contribution of prosodic sensitivity to word reading and spelling in early readers

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 509-521 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Holliman ◽  
N. Gutiérrez Palma ◽  
S. Critten ◽  
C. Wood ◽  
H. Cunnane ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Jodie L. Enderby ◽  
Julia M. Carroll ◽  
M. Luisa Tarczynski-Bowles ◽  
Helen L. Breadmore

Abstract While most English words are multisyllabic, research on literacy acquisition has tended to focus on early acquisition of monosyllabic words. The processes involved in multisyllabic word reading and spelling in middle childhood are likely to differ from those in monosyllabic reading and spelling. The current paper examines the contributions of morphological awareness (MA; awareness of derivational morphemes), prosodic sensitivity (sensitivity to lexical stress), and phonological awareness (PA; awareness of phonemes) for multisyllabic word reading and spelling, after accounting for background variables (age, vocabulary, nonverbal IQ, short-term memory). Seventy 7–10-year-old children completed a battery of tasks. MA and prosodic sensitivity were independent predictors of multisyllabic reading, while MA and PA were independent predictors of multisyllabic spelling. These results contrast with previous research, which instead found that PA plays a more prominent role while prosodic sensitivity appears to demonstrate only an indirect influence. However, those studies largely examined reading of shorter, one to three syllable words. These findings indicate when words are longer and multisyllabic, prosodic sensitivity, PA, and MA have differing direct influences on literacy. MA and prosodic sensitivity relate to word reading, while MA and PA are important for spelling.


1994 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Davidson ◽  
Joseph R. Jenkins

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Narges Arab-Moghaddam ◽  
Monique Senechal

The concurrent development of reading and spelling in English and Persian were examined in a sample of bilingual children. The objective was to compare how phonological and orthographic processing skills contribute to reading and spelling for two alphabetic languages that differ drastically. English orthography is characterised by both polyphony (i.e., a grapheme representing more than one phoneme) and polygraphy (i.e., a phoneme represented by more than one grapheme) which results in a complex script to read and write. In contrast, vowelised-Persian orthography is characterised by polygraphy only, which results in a simple script to read but more complex to write. Fifty-five Iranian children in grades 2 and 3, who had lived in English-speaking Canada for an average of 4 years, were tested on word reading and spelling in English and Persian. We found that the predictors of reading performance were similar across languages: Phonological and orthographic processing skills each predicted unique variance in word reading in English and in Persian once we had controlled for grade level, vocabulary, and reading experience. As expected, the predictors of spelling performance differed across language: Spelling in English was predicted similarly by phonological and orthographic processing skills, whereas spelling in Persian was predicted by orthographic processing skills only. It is possible that the nature of the Persian orthography encourages children to adopt different strategies when reading and spelling words. Spelling Persian words might be particularly conducive to using an analytic strategy which, in turn, promotes the development of and reliance on orthographic skills.


2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannu Savolainen ◽  
Timo Ahonen ◽  
Mikko Aro ◽  
Asko Tolvanen ◽  
Leena Holopainen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document