scholarly journals Geochemical Constraints on the Origin of the Moon and Preservation of Ancient Terrestrial Heterogeneities

2020 ◽  
Vol 216 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon J. Lock ◽  
Katherine R. Bermingham ◽  
Rita Parai ◽  
Maud Boyet
Keyword(s):  
The Moon ◽  
Geochemical Constraints ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

Geochemical Constraints on the Early Thermal History of the Earth

1989 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 883-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Drake
Keyword(s):  
Upper Mantle ◽  
Partition Coefficients ◽  
Current Theory ◽  
Gravitational Potential Energy ◽  
The Moon ◽  
The Core ◽  
The Earth ◽  
History Of ◽  
Geochemical Constraints ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

Abstract Theories of the formation of the Earth strongly suggest that the Earth should have been substantially molten during and immediately after accretion. Estimates of the composition of the upper mantle indicate that many elements are present in chondritic ratios. Experimental measurements of element partition coefficients show that segregation of perovskite, majorite garnet, or olivine would fractionate the ratios of these elements away from chondritic values. The implication of these geochemical observations is that the Earth did not undergo extensive fractionation during and immediately following accretion. One possibility is that the Earth did not become substantially molten. Alternatively, if the Earth was indeed substantially molten, then it is possible that minerals were entrained in magma and were unable to segregate. In the former case, the accretional process must have delivered gravitational potential energy more slowly than current theory predicts, and an origin of the Moon in a giant impact would be unlikely. In the latter case, the high Mg/Si ratio in the upper mantle of the Earth relative to most classes of chondrites would be intrinsic to the silicate portion of the Earth. Unless significant amounts of Si exist in the core, the high Mg/Si ratio is a bulk planetary property, implying that the accretional process did not mix material between 1 AU and 2-4 AU.

The Origin of the Moon

1962 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. L. Ruskol
Keyword(s):  
Chemical Composition ◽  
Solar System ◽  
The Moon ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

The difference between average densities of the Moon and Earth was interpreted in the preceding report by Professor H. Urey as indicating a difference in their chemical composition. Therefore, Urey assumes the Moon's formation to have taken place far away from the Earth, under conditions differing substantially from the conditions of Earth's formation. In such a case, the Earth should have captured the Moon. As is admitted by Professor Urey himself, such a capture is a very improbable event. In addition, an assumption that the “lunar” dimensions were representative of protoplanetary bodies in the entire solar system encounters great difficulties.

The Origin of the Moon and its Relationship to the Origin of the Solar System

1962 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 133-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold C. Urey
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
The Moon ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Short Period ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

During the last 10 years, the writer has presented evidence indicating that the Moon was captured by the Earth and that the large collisions with its surface occurred within a surprisingly short period of time. These observations have been a continuous preoccupation during the past years and some explanation that seemed physically possible and reasonably probable has been sought.

scholarly journals Isotopic evidence for the formation of the Moon in a canonical giant impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sune G. Nielsen ◽  
David V. Bekaert ◽  
Maureen Auro
Keyword(s):  
Solar System ◽  
Isotope Fractionation ◽  
Main Stage ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Giant Impact ◽  
Bulk Silicate Earth ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Isotopic Measurements ◽  
Origin Of The Moon

AbstractIsotopic measurements of lunar and terrestrial rocks have revealed that, unlike any other body in the solar system, the Moon is indistinguishable from the Earth for nearly every isotopic system. This observation, however, contradicts predictions by the standard model for the origin of the Moon, the canonical giant impact. Here we show that the vanadium isotopic composition of the Moon is offset from that of the bulk silicate Earth by 0.18 ± 0.04 parts per thousand towards the chondritic value. This offset most likely results from isotope fractionation on proto-Earth during the main stage of terrestrial core formation (pre-giant impact), followed by a canonical giant impact where ~80% of the Moon originates from the impactor of chondritic composition. Our data refute the possibility of post-giant impact equilibration between the Earth and Moon, and implies that the impactor and proto-Earth mainly accreted from a common isotopic reservoir in the inner solar system.

scholarly journals The Lunar orbit paradox

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-146
Author(s):  
Aleksandar Tomic
Keyword(s):  
Inertial Mass ◽  
Lunar Orbit ◽  
The Sun ◽  
The Moon ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Three Body ◽  
Origin Of The Moon ◽  
Force Intensity ◽  
Critical Consideration

Newton's formula for gravity force gives greather force intensity for atraction of the Moon by the Sun than atraction by the Earth. However, central body in lunar (primary) orbit is the Earth. So appeared paradox which were ignored from competent specialist, because the most important problem, determination of lunar orbit, was inmediately solved sufficiently by mathematical ingeniosity - introducing the Sun as dominant body in the three body system by Delaunay, 1860. On this way the lunar orbit paradox were not canceled. Vujicic made a owerview of principles of mechanics in year 1998, in critical consideration. As an example for application of corrected procedure he was obtained gravity law in some different form, which gave possibility to cancel paradox of lunar orbit. The formula of Vujicic, with our small adaptation, content two type of acceleration - related to inertial mass and related to gravity mass. So appears carried information on the origin of the Moon, and paradox cancels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document