Immune tolerance induction for patients with severe hemophilia A: a critical literature review

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Massimo Franchini ◽  
Giuseppe Lippi
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Critical Literature

Induction of Immune Tolerance in a 7-Year-Old Hemophiliac with an Anaphylactoid Inhibitor

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (04) ◽  
pp. 1039-1041 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L Harper ◽  
Joan C Gill ◽  
Russell J Hopp ◽  
John Evans ◽  
William D Haire
Keyword(s):  
Antibody Titer ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
High Purity ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction

Summary Background: Anaphylactic reactions were a rare complication of low purity VIII concentrates, hut not with high purity VIII concentrates Case: 7 y/o WM with severe hemophilia A, received only cryoprecipitate and monoclonally purified VIII concentrates; developed post-infusional urticaria. A 2-Bethesda-unit inhibitor was detected. Generalized urticaria and bronchospasm following factor developed as the titer increased. Skin tests demonstrated reactivity to plasma derived VIII, but not recombinant VIII (rhVIII). Attempts at desensitization using rhVIII failed. KLISA revealed an anti-VIIl IgB antibody. He was treated with a modified tolerance regimen using rhVIII starting at 500 U/day with aggressive premedication. The dosage increased by 200 U weekly as tolerated to a maximum of l00U/kg/d without symptoms. Results: His antibody titer decreased rapidly once he started l00U/kg/d. Six months later, the inhibitor was <1 Bethesda unit. Conclusion: Immune tolerance induction using a graduated dosage of rhVIII was successful.

Immune Tolerance Induction in 28 Children with Hemophilia Awith Inhibitors.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1046-1046
Author(s):  
Michael U. Callaghan ◽  
Indira Warrier ◽  
Madhvi Rajpurkar ◽  
Jeanne Lusher
Keyword(s):  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Hemophilia B ◽  
Recurrent Infections ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
Peak Titer

Abstract Aim: To study the characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with hemophilia with inhibitors who have undergone immune tolerance induction (ITI) at the Children’s Hospital of Michigan over the past 14 years. Methods: In compliance with local IRB regulations, patient charts and laboratory databases were reviewed and salient data extracted. 28 boys underwent 29 attempts at immune tolerance induction. Results: Hemophilia A 26 boys with severe hemophilia A with inhibitors underwent 27 trials of ITI. In this cohort of 26 patients the average age at which patients developed an inhibitor was 22 months and the average age at start of ITI was 5 years 4 months (range 2 months to 17 years 5 months). The average number of exposure days prior to inhibitor development was 10 (1–47). The average time between development of an inhibitor and initiation of ITI was 43 months, with no difference between those who successfully completed ITI and those who did not. Six patients had low titer inhibitors (0.8–6.5 BU) and successfully completed ITI using a modified low dose ITI regimen of factor infusions 3–7 times per week. 20 of the patients with high titer inhibitors (6.4–1280 BU) were treated with daily infusions of 50–200 units/kg/d of factor VIII (FVIII) products. For ITI, 4 patients received high purity plasma derived FVIII (PD-FVIII) and 21 received recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) and one received both. In patients who became tolerized to FVIII, the average time to achieve an inhibitor titer of 0 Bethesda Units (BU) was 211 days. In those who were unable to achieve tolerance, the average length of the trial was 263 days. 21 of the ITI trials employed a central venous catheter and in 5 patients ITI was stopped after removal of the line because of recurrent infections. 14 boys received FEIBA, rFVIIa, or porcine FVIII for bleeding episodes during ITI; 8 of them failed ITI and one is still on therapy. Seven trials of ITI were in Caucasian patients (26 %), 17 in African American (AA) (63 %), and 3 in Middle Eastern patients (11 %). 19 patients achieved complete tolerance (73 %), 6 patients failed (23 %), one failed twice, and one patient continues on therapy. All but 2 patients who successfully completed ITI went on prophylaxis with FVIII. All patients who successfully completed ITI have maintained tolerance with a mean follow-up of 101 months (range 7–168). Table I: Hemophilia A Failed ITI Successful ITI *One still ongoing Number of trials* 7 (23 %) 19 (73 %) African Americans 7 (41 %) 10 (59 %) Non-AA 0 10 (100 %) Historical Peak Titer (mean) 345 BU 47 BU Titer at Start of ITI (mean) 62 BU 5 BU Peak Titer on ITI (mean) 168 BU 46 BU Age at inhibitor development (mean) 26 months 12 months ITI with PD-FVIII 1 4 ITI with rFVIII 7 15 Hemophilia B During this time period, 2 boys with severe hemophilia B underwent ITI. Both had severe allergic reactions at the time of inhibitor development; both underwent desensitization successfully but both failed ITI. Both started ITI with plasma derived factor nine at age 15 months. One developed nephrotic syndrome while on ITI. Conclusions: Most patients with Hemophilia A were able to achieve and maintain tolerance (73%). Higher titer inhibitors, hemophilia B, younger age at development of inhibitor, AA race and treatment of bleeds with bypass agents or porcine factor while on ITI were risk factors for ITI failures. Loss of central venous access with recurrent infections was also a common reason for ITI failure.

scholarly journals What is the role of an extended half-life product in immune tolerance induction in a patient with severe hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitors?

Hematology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 (1) ◽  
pp. 648-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maissaa Janbain ◽  
Steven Pipe
Keyword(s):  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Half Life ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
History Of

Abstract A 10-year-old boy presents with a history of severe hemophilia A and high-titer inhibitor that had failed high-dose immune tolerance induction (ITI) with a recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) product and a plasma-derived FVIII product. You are asked by his mother whether he should be tried on ITI with an extended half-life product, in particular, consideration of a rFVIIIFc concentrate.

scholarly journals Immune tolerance induction in patients with severe hemophilia A with inhibitors

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Eun Ryu ◽  
Young Shil Park ◽  
Ki Young Yoo ◽  
Kyoo Duck Lee ◽  
Yong-Mook Choi
Keyword(s):  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction

Influence of the type of factor VIII concentrate on the incidence of factor VIII inhibitors in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Goudemand ◽  
Chantal Rothschild ◽  
Virginie Demiguel ◽  
Christine Vinciguerrat ◽  
Thierry Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Adjusted Relative Risk ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Inhibitor Development ◽  
End Point ◽  
History Of

Abstract Inhibitor development is the major treatment complication in children with severe hemophilia A. It is not clear whether the risk of inhibitors is higher with recombinant factor VIII or with plasma-derived factor VIII. We used multivariate analysis to compare 2 cohorts of previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A: 62 patients treated with the same brand of high-purity plasma-derived FVIII (pFVIII) containing von Willebrand factor (VWF) and 86 patients treated with full-length recombinant FVIII (rFVIII). In addition to the usual end points (all inhibitors, high inhibitors), we also examined a third end point (high inhibitors and/or immune tolerance induction). The risk of inhibitor development was higher in patients treated with rFVIII than in patients treated with pFVIII, regardless of other risk factors (F8 genotype; nonwhite origin; history of inhibitors in patients with a family history of hemophilia; age at first FVIII infusion). The adjusted relative risk (RRa) for inhibitor development with rFVIII versus pFVIII was 2.4 (all inhibitors), 2.6 (high inhibitors), and 3.2 (high inhibitors and/or immune tolerance induction), respectively, depending on the end point (above). The pathophysiology of this large effect must be understood in order to improve the characteristics of recombinant products and to reduce the incidence of inhibitors to FVIII.

scholarly journals What is the Evidence for the Use of Immunomodulatory Agents to Eradicate Inhibitory Antibodies in Patients with Severe Hemophilia A Who Have Previously Failed to Respond to Immune Tolerance Induction?

Hematology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 (1) ◽  
pp. 405-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael U. Callaghan ◽  
Patrick F. Fogarty
Keyword(s):  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
High Titer ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Inhibitory Antibody ◽  
Immunomodulatory Agents ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
Inhibitory Antibodies

Abstract An 18-year-old man has severe hemophilia A that has been complicated by a high-titer inhibitory antibody (peak 170 BU/mL). He had previously failed a trial of immune tolerance induction (ITI) using daily high-dose (100 units/kg/d) factor VIII (FVIII) for 20 months and would like to know if immunomodulatory agents, with or without another course of ITI, might eradicate the inhibitor.

scholarly journals Immunotolerance induction in a pediatric hemophilic patient in Costa Rica

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriana Porras Moreno ◽  
Danny Ugalde Solera
Keyword(s):  
Factor Viii ◽  
Immune Tolerance ◽  
Hemophilia A ◽  
Tolerance Induction ◽  
Low Doses ◽  
Severe Hemophilia ◽  
Immune Tolerance Induction ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Hemophilic Patient ◽  
The World

Hemophilia A is an X – linked bleeding disorder. It can be treated with Factor VIII prophylaxis or on demand treatment. Most countries in the world use prophylaxis as it is less expensive than treating patients when they are bleeding. The production of factor VIII inhibitors is the most common and serious complication of the treatment. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the only option of treatment when patients develop inhibitors proven to be successful to eradicate this condition, therefore decreasing inhibitors and costs. A case of a successful immune tolerance induction with low doses of factor VIII (FVIII) in a pediatric patient with severe hemophilia A and FVIII inhibitors is presented. Even though inmunotolerance has been practice before in our country, a case like this has never been published.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document