ASM1D-GAN: An Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Assembled 1D Convolutional Neural Network and Generative Adversarial Networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 91 (10) ◽  
pp. 1237-1247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengyao Gao ◽  
Xueren Wang ◽  
Xuhong Miao ◽  
Changwei Su ◽  
Yibin Li
Machines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 360
Author(s):  
Pu Yang ◽  
Chenwan Wen ◽  
Huilin Geng ◽  
Peng Liu

This paper introduces a new intelligent fault diagnosis method based on stack pruning sparse denoising autoencoder and convolutional neural network (sPSDAE-CNN). This method processes the original input data by using a stack denoising autoencoder. Different from the traditional autoencoder, stack pruning sparse denoising autoencoder includes a fully connected autoencoding network, the features extracted from the front layer of the network are used for the operation of the subsequent layer, which means that some new connections will appear between the front and rear layers of the network, reduce the loss of information, and obtain more effective features. Firstly, a one-dimensional sliding window is introduced for data enhancement. In addition, transforming one-dimensional time-domain data into the two-dimensional gray image can further improve the deep learning (DL) ability of models. At the same time, pruning operation is introduced to improve the training efficiency and accuracy of the network. The convolutional neural network model with sPSDAE has a faster training speed, strong adaptability to noise interference signals, and can also suppress the over-fitting problem of the convolutional neural network to a certain extent. Actual experiments show that for the fault of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) blade damage, the sPSDAE-CNN model we use has better stability and reliable prediction accuracy than traditional convolutional neural networks. At the same time, For noise signals, better results can be obtained. The experimental results show that the sPSDAE-CNN model still has a good diagnostic accuracy rate in a high-noise environment. In the case of a signal-to-noise ratio of −4, it still has an accuracy rate of 90%.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document