Hexavalent chromium bioreduction and chemical precipitation of sulphate as a treatment of site-specific fly ash leachates

Author(s):  
Errol D. Cason ◽  
Peter J. Williams ◽  
Elizabeth Ojo ◽  
Julio Castillo ◽  
Mary F. DeFlaun ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muluken B. Yeheyis ◽  
Julie Q. Shang ◽  
Ernest K. Yanful

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 171-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Kostarelos ◽  
Daniela Reale ◽  
Dimitris Dermatas ◽  
Ennio Rao ◽  
Deok Hyun Moon

2004 ◽  
Vol 50 (8) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.M. Sun ◽  
J.C. Huang

A systematic study was conducted to assess the mechanisms involved in the co-removal of hexavalent chromium during chemical precipitation of divalent copper. Batch tests were used to assess the precipitation phenomena in both pure copper solutions and also mixed copper-Cr(VI) solutions with progressive addition of sodium carbonate to increase pH and induce precipitation. It was found that the coremoval of Cr(VI) was caused by two distinct mechanisms: coprecipitation of copper with Cr(VI) at pH 5.0 to 5.2, leading to the formation of CuCrO4 precipitates. Once the fine crystallites of CuCrO4 were formed, the test solution became heterogeneous and this accelerated the production of copper-carbonate precipitates, mainly in the form of CuCO3·Cu(OH)2, at pH 5.2 to 6.2. The latter precipitates were negatively charged at pH below 7.5, and thus they were able to adsorb a considerable amount of the remaining chromate ions [HCrO4- and CrO42-]. The extent of adsorption depended on both pH and surface loading. Besides electrostatic attraction, ligand exchange was also found to play some role. Maximum adsorption occurred at pH 6.5. When pH was raised to 10.0, approximately 25-30% of the adsorbed chromium could become desorbed due to a surface charge reversal on the adsorbent.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74
Author(s):  
Bharti Verma ◽  
Chandrajit Balomajumder

The immense use of chromium in the electroplating process leads to the discharge of hexavalent chromium in its effluent. Since Cr(VI) is highly toxic, its exposure poses an acute risk of health. On the contrary, Cr(III) which is naturally occurring, is much less toxic than Cr(VI). Therefore the easiest way to deal with Cr(VI) is to reduce it into its trivalent form. Exhaustive chemical analysis was done to reduce Cr(VI) to Cr(III) by using sodium metabisulfite (Na2S2O5) and ferrous sulfate (FeSO4). And after the reduction process, precipitating agents such as (Ca(OH)2), (NaOH) and a combination of the two were used to precipitate Cr(III) as hydroxides. Various parameters were varied and optimized. It was observed that the % Cr(VI) reduction increased from 88% to 99.97% when the dosage of sodium metabisulfite increased from 40 mg/L to 100 mg/L at a pH of 2. The maximum removal of 98.2% was achieved by using the combination of Ca(OH)2 + NaOH at a pH of 9.   Bull. Chem. Soc. Ethiop. 2020, 34(1), 67-74. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/bcse.v34i1.6


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 28603-28613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscila Baruffi Ribeiro ◽  
Vitoria Olave de Freitas ◽  
Karine Machry ◽  
Ana Rosa Costa Muniz ◽  
Gabriela Silveira da Rosa

1996 ◽  
Vol 31 (20) ◽  
pp. 2843-2853 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. P. Dasmahapatra ◽  
T. K. Pal ◽  
B. Bhattacharya

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Jonidi Jafari ◽  
Somayeh Golbaz ◽  
Roshanak Rezaei Kalantary

This work aimed to remove hexavalent chromium and three treatment schemes were examined based on a laboratory scale design: (a) Fenton process, (b) precipitation process, and (c) Fenton process followed by precipitation process. Variations of this study including pH, Fenton and precipitation reagents (molar ratio of Fe2+/H2O2 and FeCl3), contact time, and initial concentration of chromium were investigated. The results showed that about 98% of Cr+6 is removed by the coagulation property of the Fenton process, and the ideal conditions for its removal included Cr+6 = 10 mg/L, pH = 4, molar ratio Fe2+/H2O2 = 2.4 with a time duration of 30 min. Maximal removal efficiency of Cr+6 in the precipitation process was equivalent to 97% in the following optimum conditions: Cr+6 = 5 mg/L, pH = 7, FeCl3 = 0.7 g/L and deposition time of 20 min. Combination of these two methods can remove greater concentrations of chromium (15 mg/L) to about 99.99%. Therefore, removal of Cr+6 by the combined Fenton and precipitation process was better than any of the methods alone (Kruskal-Wallis, P value ≤0.05). Consequently, the Fenton process followed by precipitation process can be considered as a suitable process for Cr+6 removal to achieve environmental standards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document