scholarly journals Forecasting carbon emissions due to electricity power generation in Bahrain

Author(s):  
Mohammed Redha Qader ◽  
Shahnawaz Khan ◽  
Mustafa Kamal ◽  
Muhammad Usman ◽  
Mohammad Haseeb
Author(s):  
Dushant P. Singh ◽  
Prashant J. Gadakh ◽  
Pravin M. Dhanrao ◽  
Sharmila Mohanty ◽  
Debabala Swain ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 1810-1818 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. M. Emmott ◽  
N. J. Ekins-Daukes ◽  
J. Nelson

We assess the net carbon emissions during a transition to photovoltaic power generation, comparing established and emerging thin-film PV technologies.


Our environment is extremely important to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1PCC) and other environmental protection agencies because it is a place where flora and fauna as well as the entire human population of the world exist. This report evaluates the environmental impacts resulting from the use of coal as a source of fuel for electricity power generation and coal as a fuel source to generate electricity for steel production process. GABI models were developed for each of the processes and used for the assessment and analysis to ensure compliance with ISO 14044 standards. After identifying the numerous forms of emission obtained from GABI software, the results were compared to determine the environmental impact and severity of each process. The result for Global Warming Potential (GWP) using coal as a fuel source for steel production accounted for 129.7029 Kg of CO2 equivalence compared to 0.447267Kg of CO2 equivalence result obtained as the GWP for using coal as fuel source for electric power generation. Similarly, the result obtained for acidification when coal is used as a fuel source for steel production recorded 0.360921Kg of SO4 equivalence compared to 1.4026Kg of SO4 equivalence obtained as acidification value for using coal as fuel source for electric power generation. Furthermore, the result obtained for Eutrophication when coal is used as a source of fuel for steel production accounted for -1389.273e-4Kg of phosphate equivalence compared to 2.2417Kg of phosphate equivalence obtained as the Eutrophication value for using coal as a source of fuel for electric power generation. From the aforementioned results, Eutrophication potential and Acidification potential would have lower environmental impacts for both processes whereas, the GWP for electric power generation was quite minimal while GWP for steel production using coal as a fuel source would have relatively high impact on the environment. For this reasons, it was concluded that electric power generation using coal as a source of fuel has less environmental impact whereas, steel production using coal as a source of fuel may not be environmentally friendly due to the high GWP obtained in this report.


2012 ◽  
Vol 512-515 ◽  
pp. 1185-1188
Author(s):  
Miao Sheng Chen ◽  
Yung Tse Tsai

It is generally true that energy authorities always pursue optimal electrical power generation for use by the population at large. This text extends the application of the basic model of Rebelo’s Cobb-Douglas production model in order to calculate ways in which energy authorities (power companies) can generate optimal electricity using their existing equipment. This paper also applies that governments can utilize the concept of Environment Rent and the Contribution Theory from traditional Chinese philosophy to face the energy issues. Besides, the paper attempts to calculate and identify optimal solutions from these mathematics models, an approach which is rarely seen in the power generation journals. The use if existing equipment to optimize electricity (power) generation for the population will have an impact on economical development and electricity control. The appropriate control of power generation can effectively reduce the use of certain dangerous and polluting energy sources, and this is the main contribution of this study.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc A. Parker

Abstract Worldwide energy consumption is accelerating at an unprecedented rate while humanity comes to understand the effects of climate change. Renewable resources such as wind and solar supply more energy every year, but the overwhelming majority of energy consumed is still from fossil fuels. The transition to zero carbon emission sources is important, but carbon negative energy could also become necessary in ensuring a sustainable global environment and economy. The most technically and commercially viable carbon negative solution is biomass-fueled power generation with carbon capture and sequestration. A conceptual design based on a biomass-fired circulating fluidized-bed boiler and developed using the Thermoflex software package (Thermoflow, Inc.) is presented that can be evaluated and pursued by the research, engineering, and business communities. Recommendations are proposed for siting and fuel supply in the Southeastern U.S., with an evaluation of some of the impacts from wood harvesting, processing, and transportation to the lifecycle carbon emissions. An economic analysis of this carbon negative concept indicates that certain policy proposals in the U.S. could make biomass power generation with carbon capture and sequestration an economically feasible resource. Results show that an owner and/or the public could realize a net benefit of up to $332/MWh above and beyond marginal energy or capacity values under aggressive carbon pricing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document