Hemeroby as an impact category indicator for the integration of land use into life cycle (impact) assessment

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1511-1527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horst Fehrenbach ◽  
Birgit Grahl ◽  
Jürgen Giegrich ◽  
Mirjam Busch
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 4089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Teixeira ◽  
Tiago Morais ◽  
Tiago Domingos

Land use is increasingly important for impact assessment in life cycle assessment (LCA). Its impacts on biodiversity and provision of ecosystem services are crucial to depict the environmental performance of products. Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) models are commonly selected by consensus through processes frequently misinformed by the absence of practical application studies. Here, we performed an assessment of all free and peer-reviewed LCIA models for land use. We started with spatial correlation analysis at the country scale. Models that use the same indicators are strongly correlated, suggesting that regionalization is no longer a decisive issue in model selection. We applied these models in a case study for cattle production where feeds are replaced by sown biodiverse pastures (SBP). We tested (1) a non-regionalized inventory from an LCA database and, (2) a regionalized inventory that explicit considered the locations of land occupation and transformation. We found the same qualitative result: the installation of SBP avoids impacts due to feed substitution. Each hectare of SBP installed avoids the occupation of 0.5 hectares per year for feed ingredient production. Adding inventory regionalization for 70% of land use flows leads to a change of 15% in results, suggesting limited spatial differentiation between country-level characterization factors.


Sci ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Anders Andrae

Life cycle assessment (LCA) is being included formally in EcoDesign regulations. Especially product carbon footprint will be mandatory in Europe. However, life cycle impact assessment, including global warming potential (GWP) in LCA, is hampered by several challenges. One of these is a lack of water vapor characterization indexes for GWP. A life cycle inventory profile for air transport fuel, including water vapor emissions, is evaluated with state-of-the-art practice, i.e., Environmental Footprint (EF) Method and International Life Cycle Data (ILCD) 2011 Mid-point+, neglecting water vapor’s high altitude GWP compared to carbon dioxide. Then, the characterization factor in GWP over 100 years (GWP100) for water vapor and alternate normalization for particulates are introduced. The results are compared. The main findings are that the previous EF method and ILCD both generate rather realistic results for Particulate Matter and Respiratory Inorganics mid-point indicators, respectively, but the number of premature deaths should be better allocated to different specific emissions, and that water vapor may dominate the GWP100 result over the usual carbon dioxide. Respiratory inorganics may need one impact category, each starting with particles smaller than 2.5 µm. LCIA mid-points need measurable and understandable bases. The common knowledge of water vapor’s GWP100 should not be neglected in LCIA for air transport and beyond where relevant.


2010 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1483-1488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Liu ◽  
ZuoRen Nie ◽  
BoXue Sun ◽  
ZhiHong Wang ◽  
XianZheng Gong

2019 ◽  
Vol 693 ◽  
pp. 133374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Othoniel ◽  
Benedetto Rugani ◽  
Reinout Heijungs ◽  
Marco Beyer ◽  
Miriam Machwitz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 864-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago G. Morais ◽  
Cláudia Silva ◽  
Asma Jebari ◽  
Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes ◽  
Tiago Domingos ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Frank Brentrup ◽  
Jürgen Küsters ◽  
Joachim Lammel ◽  
Hermann Kuhlmann

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document