scholarly journals Automatic annotation of hip anatomy in fluoroscopy for robust and efficient 2D/3D registration

Author(s):  
Robert B. Grupp ◽  
Mathias Unberath ◽  
Cong Gao ◽  
Rachel A. Hegeman ◽  
Ryan J. Murphy ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 2610-2613
Author(s):  
Dong-yan LI ◽  
Shao-zi LI ◽  
Xiao KE

Author(s):  
Nicola Piccinelli ◽  
Andrea Roberti ◽  
Eleonora Tagliabue ◽  
Francesco Setti ◽  
Gernot Kronreif ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (22-23) ◽  
pp. 5562-5562
Author(s):  
Alistair MacDougall ◽  
Vladimir Volynkin ◽  
Rabie Saidi ◽  
Diego Poggioli ◽  
Hermann Zellner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Daniele Gibelli ◽  
Andrea Palamenghi ◽  
Pasquale Poppa ◽  
Chiarella Sforza ◽  
Cristina Cattaneo ◽  
...  

AbstractPersonal identification of the living from video surveillance systems usually involves 2D images. However, the potentiality of three-dimensional facial models in gaining personal identification through 3D-3D comparison still needs to be verified. This study aims at testing the reliability of a protocol for 3D-3D registration of facial models, potentially useful for personal identification. Fifty male subjects aged between 18 and 45 years were randomly chosen from a database of 3D facial models acquired through stereophotogrammetry. For each subject, two acquisitions were available; the 3D models of faces were then registered onto other models belonging to the same and different individuals according to the least point-to-point distance on the entire facial surface, for a total of 50 matches and 50 mismatches. RMS value (root mean square) of point-to-point distance between the two models was then calculated through the VAM® software. Intra- and inter-observer errors were assessed through calculation of relative technical error of measurement (rTEM). Possible statistically significant differences between matches and mismatches were assessed through Mann–Whitney test (p < 0.05). Both for intra- and inter-observer repeatability rTEM was between 2.2 and 5.2%. Average RMS point-to-point distance was 0.50 ± 0.28 mm in matches, 2.62 ± 0.56 mm in mismatches (p < 0.01). An RMS threshold of 1.50 mm could distinguish matches and mismatches in 100% of cases. This study provides an improvement to existing 3D-3D superimposition methods and confirms the great advantages which may derive to personal identification of the living from 3D facial analysis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 69 ◽  
pp. 101957
Author(s):  
Rewa R. Sood ◽  
Wei Shao ◽  
Christian Kunder ◽  
Nikola C. Teslovich ◽  
Jeffrey B. Wang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document