The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of psoriatic arthritis

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kane
2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 570.1-570
Author(s):  
A. Stan ◽  
M. Calle ◽  
P. Schoonheim ◽  
P. J. Mease

Background:Physicians face challenges staying up-to-date with the latest research and accessing the ever-growing field of knowledge is time-consuming. Online education can make these clinician’s tasks more efficient and less time-consuming.Objectives:As part of a larger curriculum, we developed an online CME activity titled: “Enthesitis in Psoriatic Arthritis: Disease, Diagnosis and Decisions”. The goal of this study was to assess whether this online CME accredited video discussion improves physicians’ understanding of the role of enthesitis in the diagnosis and management of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in clinical practice.Methods:Rheumatologists participated in an online CME activity (https://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/910671) consisting of a 30-minute video discussion between 2 experts with accompanying slides. Educational effect was assessed using a 4-question repeated pairs, pre-/post-assessment. A chi-square test was used to determine if a statistically significant improvement (P<.05 significance level) existed in the number of correct responses from the pretest and posttest scores. Cramer’s V was used to estimate the level of impact of the education. The CME activity launched on March 28, 2019, and the data were collected through June 7, 2019.Results:A total of 145 rheumatologists completed the pre- and post activity assessments. Overall the activity had a signficiant impact (P<.0001) on rheumatologists’ knowledge of the role of enthesitis in the diagnosis and management of PsA, with a Cramer’s V value of 0.153 indicating a noticeble educational impact. The average percentage of correct responses rose from 54% pre-activity to 69% post-activity. A repeated pairs analysis showed that 22% of rheumatologists improved their knowledge and 47% reinforced their knowledge, respectively. The change in percentage of correct responses from pre- to post-assessment for all questions are shown in table. Almost 40% of rheumatologists had a measurable improvement in confidence in their ability to evaluate the presence of enthesitis according to a clinical exam or ultrasound.Table.Impact of education on rheumatologists’ knowledge of enthesitisQuestion #Question topicAggregated dataLinked Learner ResultsaAverage % of correct responses Pre- vs. Post-educationP-value% ImprovedblearnersPre- vs. Post-education% ReinforcedclearnersPre- vs. Post-education1.Immunopathology of PsA75% vs 84%.057912%72%2.Prevalence of enthesitis in patients with PsA44% vs 68%<.000133%34%3.Clinical trial outcomes in patients with enthesitis43% vs 56%.034522%34%aEach individual learner tracked pre and post-educationbIncorrect answer pre-education, Correct answer post-educationcCorrect answer pre-education, Correct answer post-educationConclusion:This online CME activity significantly improved rheumatologists’ understanding of role of enthesitis in the diagnosis and management of PsA. However, there is clearly room for further improving physicians’ knowledge of clinical trial outcomes with biologics in patients with enthesitis, since 44% of rheumatologists provided incorrect answers to question 3 post-education. This topic can be addressed in future education.Acknowledgments:This CME-certified activity was supported by independent funding from Novartis AG.Disclosure of Interests:Adriana Stan Grant/research support from: The CME-certified activity was supported by an independent educational grant from Sandoz., Marinella Calle Grant/research support from: This CME-certified activity was supported by an independent educational grant from Novartis AG, Peter Schoonheim Grant/research support from: This CME-certified activity was supported by independent funding from Sandoz., Philip J Mease Grant/research support from: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – grant/research support, Consultant of: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sun Pharmaceutical, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Abbott, Amgen, Biogen Idec, BMS, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau


JAMA ◽  
1966 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. E. Van Metre

Author(s):  
Krishna Prasad Lamichhane ◽  
Shaili Pradhan ◽  
Ranjita Shreshta Gorkhali ◽  
Pramod Kumar Koirala

Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome (PLS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder associated with rapidly progressing periodontitis leading to premature loss of deciduous and permanent dentition and diffuse palmoplantar keratosis. Immunologic alterations, genetic mutations, and role of bacteria are some aetiologic factors. Patients present with early periodontal destruction, so periodontists play a significant role in diagnosis and management. This paper reports a case of Papillon- Lefevre syndrome with its clinical manifestations and challenges for periodontal management which was diagnosed in dental department.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1633.1-1633
Author(s):  
D. Cici ◽  
C. Rotondo ◽  
A. Corrado ◽  
S. Berardi ◽  
N. Mansueto ◽  
...  

Background:Occasional findings of anti-citrullinated-protein-antibodies (ACPA) and anti-nuclear-antibodies (ANA) were rarely described in literature on Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and on Spondyloarthritis (SpA) in general. How these autoimmune dysregulations can affect the course of them is not yet understood.Objectives:The aim of our study is to evaluate if the presence of ACPA and ANA can determine different disease subsets and influence the DMARDs monotherapy (methotrexate) drug survival (DSM) and b-DMARDs multi-failure patients (MF).Methods:We conducted a retrospective study on patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and Spondyloarthritis that fulfilled the ASAS and CASPAR criteria. Patients with diagnosis of connective tissue disease and rheumatoid arthritis and patients ≤ 18 years old were excluded from the study. For each patient, the following variables were considered: age, ACPA, ANA, time between arthritis onset and start of DMARDs (start-time), DSM, switch to b-DMARDs (sw-bDMARDs), arthritis subset (oligoarticular (OA), polyarticular (PA), enthesitis (EA), axial involvement (AI)), number of comorbidities (NC), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).Results:150 patients (55% with PsA and 45% with another SpA) were included in the study. No differences were found in age, ANA rate, ACPA rate, start-time, OA, PA, EA, AI, NC and CCI between the PsA and SpA groups.In the whole group of patients, the ACPA+ subjects(11%) had a significant increase of NC (2.47 ± 1.5 vs 1.6 ± 1.4, p=0.035), a trend to higher CCI, to switch to b-DMARDs, and to be MF compared to those without ACPA. In the same group, the ANA+ patients (12%) showed shorter DSM (233.5 wk ± 45.9 vs 548.0 wk ± 56.8, p=0.362) with similar trend in each subgroup (PsA and SpA).In SpA group, the ACPA+ patients(6,3%) had a trend to shorter DSM (269.0 weeks ± 125vs 603.96 wk± 92.8, p=0.492),to higher sw-bDMARDs, and to be MF, higher NC and CCI compared to those without ACPA. No differences in clinical subset (OA, PA, EA, AI) were observed. In the same group the ANA+ patients had significant higher rate of PA (100% vs 65%, p=0.026) rather than OA (0% vs 35%, p=0.025). No significant differences were found in NC, CCI, MF.In the PsA group, ACPA+ patients showed a trend to develop PA and EA subsets, shorter DSM (187.5 wk ± 48.7 vs 299.6 wk ± 31.4, p=0.415), higher rate to sw-bDMARDs and to be MF. The ANA+ PsA patients had higher trend to develop PA and AI subsets rather than OA and EA. All ANA+ patients were MF (100% vs 42%, p=0.046).Conclusion:The ACPA and ANA positivity in PsA and SpA patients could be suggestive of more severe clinical disease manifestation, higher frequency of comorbidities and lower predicted 10-year survival (CCI). Moreover, this autoimmune dysregulation could be associated with worse drug survival in monotherapy with methotrexate and higher chance to be MF. Therefore, they can be taken into account for clinical management of these patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000663
Author(s):  
Samra Rahman ◽  
Muhammad Irfan ◽  
M A Rehman Siddiqui

Tuberculosis (TB)-associated uveitis is a common cause of infectious uveitis in the developing world. Diagnosis of TB uveitis remains a challenge. The role of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) is uncertain. Herein we summarise the available literature on the utility of IGRAs in the diagnosis and management of TB uveitis. We searched PubMed database from 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2020 using the following keywords alone and in combination: ‘interferon-gamma release assay’, ‘QuantiFERON’, ‘T-SPOT.TB’, ‘TB uveitis’, ‘serpiginous like choroiditis’, ‘tuberculoma’, ‘TB vasculitis’, ‘TB panuveitis’ and ‘ocular tuberculosis’. Data from 58 relevant studies were collated. The review is focused on currently marketed versions of IGRA tests: QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube assay, QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus assay (QFT-Plus) and T-SPOT.TB. We found limited evidence regarding the diagnostic utility of IGRA in patients with uveitis. No study was identified evaluating the newer QFT test—the QFT-Plus—in patients with uveitis. Similarly, there is lack of data directly comparing QFT-Plus with T-SPOT.TB specifically for the diagnosis of TB uveitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document