The TP53 gene polymorphisms and survival of sporadic breast cancer patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 472-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Bišof ◽  
M. Peričić Salihović ◽  
N. Smolej Narančić ◽  
T. Škarić-Jurić ◽  
J. Jakić-Razumović ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adela Madrid-Paredes ◽  
Marisa Cañadas-Garre ◽  
Antonio Sánchez-Pozo ◽  
Manuela Expósito-Ruiz ◽  
Miguel Ángel Calleja-Hernández

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Touwendpoulimdé Kiendrebeogo ◽  
Abdou Azaque Zoure ◽  
Pegdwendé Abel Sorgho ◽  
Albert Théophane Yonli ◽  
Florencia Wendkuuni Djigma ◽  
...  

AbstractBackground and objectiveBreast cancer remains the most common cause of cancer mortality in women. The aim of this study was to investigate associations between genetic variability in GSTM1 and GSTT1 and susceptibility to breast cancer.MethodsGenomic DNA was extracted from blood samples for 80 cases of histologically diagnosed breast cancer and 100 control subjects. Genotyping analyses were performed by PCR-based methods. Associations between specific genotypes and the development of breast cancer were examined using logistic regression to calculate odds ratios [1] and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).ResultsNo correlation was found between GSTM1-null and breast cancer (OR = 1.83; 95%CI 0.90-3.71; p = 0.10), while GSTT1-null (OR = 2.42; 95%CI 1.17-5.02; p= 0.01) was associated with increased breast cancer risk. The GSTM1/GSTT1 double null was not associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer (OR = 2.52; 95%CI 0.75-8.45; p = 0.20). Furthermore, analysis found no association between GSTM1-null (OR =1.12; 95%CI 0.08-15.50; p = 1.00) or GSTT1-null (OR = 1.71; 95%CI 0.13-22.51; p = 1.00) and the disease stage of familial breast cancer patients or sporadic breast cancer patients (GSTM1 (OR = 0.40; 95%CI 0.12-1.32; p = 0.20) and GSTT1 (OR = 1.41; 95%CI 0.39-5.12; p = 0.75)). Also, body mass index (BMI) was not associated with increased or decreased breast cancer risk in either GSTM1-null (OR = 0.60; 95%CI 0.21-1.68; p = 0.44) or GSTT1-null (OR = 0.60; 95%CI 0.21-1.68; p =0.45).ConclusionOur results suggest that only GSTT1-null is associated with increased susceptibility to breast cancer development.


1998 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit H. Trivedi ◽  
Shambhu K. Roy ◽  
Sonal H. Bhachech ◽  
Rashmi K. Patel ◽  
Abhija A. Dalal ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.L. Powell ◽  
S. Bydder ◽  
F. Grieu ◽  
G. Gnanasampanthan ◽  
H. Elsaleh ◽  
...  

Tumor Biology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 5451-5457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md. Siddiqul Islam ◽  
Mohammad Safiqul Islam ◽  
Salma Parvin ◽  
Maizbah Uddin Ahmed ◽  
Muhammad Shahdaat Bin Sayeed ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20087-20087
Author(s):  
J. Melter ◽  
G. Pazdrova ◽  
F. Janku ◽  
Z. Kleibl ◽  
J. Novotny ◽  
...  

20087 Background: Nijmegen breakage syndrome (NBS) caused by mutation [657del(5)] in exon 6 of NBS-1 is an autosomal recessive disorder with microcephaly, immunodeficiency, radiosensitivity, and predisposition to lymphoid malignancies. Recently, high frequency of NBS-1 mutation was found in some Slavic populations. Because NBS-1 heterozygotes may have high incidence of neoplastic changes, there is an urgent need to clarify the role of NBS-1 mutation in breast cancer carcinogenesis. Methods: We analyzed the NBS-1 status in 472 sporadic breast cancer patients treated in the Department of Oncology, Charles University Prague. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood monocytes. Subsequently two PCRs for each sample were carried out. Reaction was visualized using electrophoresis on agarose gel. Agarose gel wells with both the NBS-1 gene-specific band and internal control band were interpreted as positive. Wells with internal control only were interpreted as negative. PCR from samples giving neither an internal control band nor specific band were repeated. DNA samples obtained from a previously typed NBS family were used as a positive control. Results: Based on previously published data we expect to find at least 5 mutation carriers. Surprisingly, in our population of 472 subjects there was no mutation identified. Conclusions: Based on results of this study there is no relationship between NBS-1 mutation and breast cancer incidence. Acknowledgment: The study was supported in part by the RASO grant from Czech Society of Oncology, and MSM0021620808. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1530-1530
Author(s):  
Jiaojiao Zhou ◽  
Kun Zhang ◽  
Xuan Zhu ◽  
Mei Deng ◽  
Meng Luo ◽  
...  

1530 Background: PALB2 (Partner and Localizer of BRCA2) is recently recognized as a breast cancer predisposition gene, which plays a critical role in genome maintenance via interacting with BRCA1/2 and RAD51 when DNA break. Germline loss-of-function mutations in PALB2 lead to increased breast cancer risk. Since the germline mutation frequency of PALB2 is much less than BRCA1/2, the distinct mutation spectrum of PALB2 is still obscure. Therefore, we assessed the mutational frequency, spectrum and predictors of the PALB2 gene in a sequential series of Chinese breast cancer patients from our Research DNA Bank, to verify the utility of PALB2 genetic testing in Chinese population. Methods: We examined Chinese breast cancer cases (n = 2279) who agreed to participate in research DNA banking, recruited from 1990 through 2016. To identify the mutations, complete coding sequence and intron–exon boundaries of PALB2 were screened with Next Generation Sequencing. Personal and family histories were synchronously collected for mutation identification. Results: Among the 2279 breast cancer patients, 307 patients were familial breast cancer cases and the rest 1972 patients were sporadic breast cancer cases. PALB2 mutation carriers accounted for 7.8% (n = 24) and 4.8% (n = 95) in familial and sporadic breast cancer cohort separately. In total, 31 missense, 4 nonsense, 3 frameshift, 3 splicing and 1 codon mutations of PALB2 were identified in this study. Among the pathologic variants, PALB2 c.1744C > T, c.2748+1G > A, c.2749-1G > C, c.3114-1G > A were newly identified in sporadic breast cancer, and c.3271delC newly found in familial breast cancer. Based on in silico analysis, a total of 6 potential damaging missense variants were novelly found in this study, among which the PALB2 c.3035C > T was detected in both sporadic and familial breast cancer. Conclusions: Our data presents the germline mutation status of PALB2 in Chinese patients with breast cancer, suggesting that loss-of-function germline mutations of PALB2 are important in both familial and sporadic breast cancer. Clinically, this information may be helpful in genetic counseling of breast cancer patients with PALB2 germline mutation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document