scholarly journals An Open-Label Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Mechanical Bowel Preparation vs Nonmechanical Bowel Preparation in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Personal Experience

2015 ◽  
Vol 77 (S3) ◽  
pp. 1233-1236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prosanta Kumar Bhattacharjee ◽  
Saibal Chakraborty
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaorong Yin ◽  
Lei Yang ◽  
Shunju Xiang ◽  
Yixuan Wu ◽  
Qian Li

Abstract BACKGROUND: Over the last decades, studies have already demonstrated that early feeding in patients after elective colorectal surgery yielded a shorter length of hospital stay and did not cause additional risk for adverse events. However, the optimal timing for beginning oral hydration after colorectal surgery under general anesthesia remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted the study to evaluate the effects of early oral hydration (EOH) versus traditional oral hydration (TOH) on thirst and clinical safety outcomes after colorectal surgery under general anesthesia. METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled trial of 1,000 patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists I–III who underwent colorectal surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to the EOH group (given 0.5 ml/kg water after recovery from general anesthesia) or TOH group (fasting and water deprivation until postoperative intestine function recovery). The primary outcome was thirst scale, and secondary outcomes were discomfort score, nausea and vomiting score, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1,000 patients who underwent randomization at initial stage, 27 were excluded in EOH group because of refusal (n=22) or nausea and vomiting before hydration (n=5). Demographic and operative data were similar, but not statistically significant (P>0.05). Patients who received EOH were associated with lower thirst score than with TOH (EOH 45.70±24.51 vs. TOH 62.20±23.99; P<0.001) and oropharyngeal discomfort scale (EOH 3.71±8.49 vs. TOH 6.18±11.89, P<0.0001) 30 min after drinking. No significant differences were found for the time of intestinal movements (EOH 73.37±34.49 h, TOH 70.56±31.71, P=0.187) and for EOH and TOH for the risk of nausea and vomiting at the postoperative period (P>0.05) and other complications (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggested the safety outcomes for mild EOH on patients after colorectal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients who received EOH could have significantly reduced degree of thirst scale and oropharyngeal discomfort scale 30 min after drinking. Trial registration: CHiCTR, CHiCTR-TRC-13003097. Registered 11 March2013, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=6462.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-411
Author(s):  
Anh T Mai‐Phan ◽  
Hai Nguyen ◽  
Tin T Nguyen ◽  
Dung A Nguyen ◽  
Truc T Thai

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yar L Yeap ◽  
John Wolfe ◽  
Jennifer Stewart ◽  
Amy McCutchan ◽  
Gulraj Chawla ◽  
...  

Aim: This study evaluated use of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) versus standard bupivacaine (SB) alone in quadratus lumborum (QL) blocks for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Materials & methods: In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients received QL1 blocks with either LB (40 ml 0.125% SB plus 20 ml of LB) or SB (60 ml of 0.25% SB) with 30 ml per side. Opioid usage, pain scores, side effects and other medications were recorded. Results: For 78 patients (38 LB; 40 SB), all parameters were similar between groups, except that the LB group had a higher 48 h need for metoclopramide. Conclusion: LB provided no analgesic benefit over SB alone for QL blocks. Clinical Trials registration number: NCT03702621


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document