Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the management of fractures of the proximal humerus: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. G. Longo ◽  
S. Petrillo ◽  
A. Berton ◽  
V. Denaro
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humerus ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Oncologic Reconstruction of the Proximal Humerus: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harrison R. Ferlauto ◽  
John R. Wickman ◽  
Alexander L. Lazarides ◽  
Stephanie Hendren ◽  
Julia D. Visgauss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humerus ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

scholarly journals Comparison of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty for Acute Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrut U Borade ◽  
Filippo Familiari ◽  
Kyubo Choi ◽  
Jacob Joseph ◽  
Edward G McFarland
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humerus ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humerus Fractures ◽  
Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty ◽  
Humerus Fractures ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

ABSTRACT The optimal treatment of proximal humerus fractures is debated; however, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has become increasingly popular as the primary treatment. We systematically reviewed the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases to identify English-language clinical studies (evidence levels I through IV) comparing the results of RTSA with those of hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the treatment of acute proximal humerus fractures. We evaluated the following outcomes: Range of motion, patient-reported outcome measures (including pain relief), and complications. We identified eight published studies comparing RTSA with HA for treatment of acute proximal humerus fractures. The RTSA group (180 patients) showed significantly better postoperative pain relief, active anterior elevation, Constant-Murley scores, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores compared with the HA group (439 patients; all p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups for overall complications (RTSA, 11.8% vs HA, 20.8%), infections (2% for both groups), dislocations (RTSA, 0% vs HA, 2.5%), or nerve injury (RTSA, 1% vs HA, 2.8%). Scapular notching occurred in 15.8% of RTSA cases (grade I, 53%; grade II, 32%; grade III, 16%; and grade IV, 0%). In the treatment of acute proximal humerus fractures, RTSA provided better pain relief, postoperative anterior elevation, and outcome scores after surgery compared with HA and had similar complication rates. Keywords Complications, Outcomes, Pain, Reverse total shoulder, Shoulder hemiarthroplasty, Surgery, Systematic review. How to cite this article Borade AU, Familiari F, Choi K, Joseph J, McFarland EG. Comparison of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty vs Hemiarthroplasty for Acute Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: Systematic Review. J Postgrad Med Edu Res 2017;51(4):182-187.

Complication and revision rates after reverse total shoulder revision from hemiarthroplasty: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 175857322110193
Author(s):  
Arjun K Reddy ◽  
Jake X Checketts ◽  
B Joshua Stephens ◽  
J Michael Anderson ◽  
Craig M Cooper ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Revisional Surgery ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Common Complication ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Background Thus, the purpose of the present study was to (1) characterize common postoperative complications and (2) quantify the rates of revision in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty revisional surgery. We hypothesize that hardware loosenings will be the most common complication to occur in the sample, with the humeral component being the most common loosening. Methods This systematic review adhered to PRISMA reporting guideline. For our inclusion criteria, we included any study that contained intraoperative and/or postoperative complication data, and revision rates on patients who had undergone revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty due to a failed hemiarthroplasty. Complications include neurologic injury, deep surgical site infections, hardware loosening/prosthetic instability, and postoperative fractures (acromion, glenoid, and humeral fractures). Results The study contained 22 studies that assessed complications from shoulders that had revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty from a hemiarthroplasty, with a total sample of 925 shoulders. We found that the most common complication to occur was hardware loosenings (5.3%), and of the hardware loosenings, humeral loosenings (3.8%) were the most common. The revision rate was found to be 10.7%. Conclusion This systematic review found that revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed hemiarthroplasty has a high overall complication and reintervention rates, specifically for hardware loosening and revision rates.

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Eleanor G. Burden ◽  
Timothy J. Batten ◽  
Christopher D. Smith ◽  
Jonathan P. Evans
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder

Aims This systematic review asked which patterns of complications are associated with the three reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthetic designs, as classified by Routman et al, in patients undergoing RTSA for the management of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. The three implant design philosophies investigated were medial glenoid/medial humerus (MGMH), medial glenoid/lateral humerus (MGLH), and lateral glenoid/medial humerus (LGMH). Methods A systematic review of the literature was performed via a search of MEDLINE and Embase. Two reviewers extracted data on complication occurrence and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Meta-analysis was conducted on the reported proportion of complications, weighted by sample size, and PROMs were pooled using the reported standardized mean difference (SMD). Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde’s non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020193041). Results A total of 42 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Rates of scapular notching were found to be significantly higher in MGMH implants (52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 63)) compared with MGLH ((18% (95% CI 6 to 34)) and LGMH (12% (95% CI 3 to 26)). Higher rates of glenoid loosening were seen in MGMH implants (6% (95% CI 3 to 10)) than in MGLH implants (0% (95% CI 0 to 2)). However, strength of evidence for this finding was low. No significant differences were identified in any other complication, and there were no significant differences observed in PROMs between implant philosophies. Conclusion This systematic review has found significant improvement in PROMS and low complication rates across the implant philosophies studied. Scapular notching was the only complication found definitely to have significantly higher prevalence with the MGMH implant design.

Increasing Use of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly Patients

Orthopedics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. e982-e989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean S. Rajaee ◽  
Dheeraj Yalamanchili ◽  
Naudereh Noori ◽  
Eytan Debbi ◽  
James Mirocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humerus ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Proximal Humerus Fractures ◽  
Humerus Fractures ◽  
Reverse Total Shoulder
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document