Data-driven motion correction rescues interpretation of rubidium PET scan with extreme breathing artifacts

Author(s):  
David Gao ◽  
Anahita Tavoosi ◽  
Christiane Wiefels ◽  
Azmina Merani ◽  
Kimberly Gardner ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia Liberini ◽  
Fotis Kotasidis ◽  
Valerie Treyer ◽  
Michael Messerli ◽  
Erika Orita ◽  
...  

AbstractTo evaluate whether quantitative PET parameters of motion-corrected 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT can differentiate between intrapancreatic accessory spleens (IPAS) and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (pNET). A total of 498 consecutive patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) who underwent 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT between March 2017 and July 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects with accessory spleens (n = 43, thereof 7 IPAS) and pNET (n = 9) were included, resulting in a total of 45 scans. PET images were reconstructed using ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) and a fully convergent iterative image reconstruction algorithm with β-values of 1000 (BSREM1000). A data-driven gating (DDG) technique (MOTIONFREE, GE Healthcare) was applied to extract respiratory triggers and use them for PET motion correction within both reconstructions. PET parameters among different samples were compared using non-parametric tests. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyzed the ability of PET parameters to differentiate IPAS and pNETs. SUVmax was able to distinguish pNET from accessory spleens and IPAs in BSREM1000 reconstructions (p < 0.05). This result was more reliable using DDG-based motion correction (p < 0.003) and was achieved in both OSEM and BSREM1000 reconstructions. For differentiating accessory spleens and pNETs with specificity 100%, the ROC analysis yielded an AUC of 0.742 (sensitivity 56%)/0.765 (sensitivity 56%)/0.846 (sensitivity 62%)/0.840 (sensitivity 63%) for SUVmax 36.7/41.9/36.9/41.7 in OSEM/BSREM1000/OSEM + DDG/BSREM1000 + DDG, respectively. BSREM1000 + DDG can accurately differentiate pNET from accessory spleen. Both BSREM1000 and DDG lead to a significant SUV increase compared to OSEM and non-motion-corrected data.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Gillman ◽  
Stephen Rose ◽  
Jye Smith ◽  
Jason A Dowling ◽  
Nicholas Dowson

Abstract Background / AimsPatient motion during positron emission tomography (PET) imaging can corrupt the image by causing blurring and quantitation error due to misalignment with the attenuation correction image. Data-driven techniques for tracking motion in PET imaging allow for retrospective motion correction, where motion may not have been prospectively anticipated.MethodsA two minute PET acquisition of a Hoffman phantom was acquired on a Bi- ograph mCT Flow, during which the phantom was rocked, simulating periodic motion with varying frequency. Motion was tracked using the sensitivity method, the axial centre-of-mass (COM) method, a novel 3D-COM method, and the principal component analysis (PCA) method. A separate two minute acquisition was acquired with no motion as a gold standard. The tracking signal was discretised into 10 gates using k-means clustering. Motion was modelled and corrected using the reconstruct-transform-add (RTA) technique, leveraging Multimodal Image Registration using Block-matching and Robust Regression (Mirorr) for rigid registration of non- attenuation-corrected 4D PET and Software for Tomographic Image Reconstruction (STIR) for PET reconstructions. Evaluation was performed by segmenting white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) in the attenuation correction computed tomography (CT). The mean uptake in the region of GM was compared with that in the WM region. Additionally, the difference between the intensity distributions of WM and GM regions was measured with the t-statistic from a Welch's t-test.ResultsDifference in the mean distribution of WM to GM ranked the techniques in order of efficacy: no correction, sensitivity, axial-COM, 3D-COM, PCA, no motion. PCA correction had a great WM/GM separation measured by the t-value than the no motion scan. This was attributed to interpolation blurring during motion correction reducing class variance.ConclusionOf the techniques examined, PCA was found to be most effective for tracking rigid motion. The sensitivity and axial-COM techniques are mostly sensitive to axial motion, and so were ineffective in this phantom experiment. 3D-COM demonstrates improved transaxial motion sensitivity, but not to the level of effectiveness of PCA.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (12) ◽  
pp. 4741-4755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silin Ren ◽  
Xiao Jin ◽  
Chung Chan ◽  
Yiqiang Jian ◽  
Tim Mulnix ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document