Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Ecer
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Home Appliance ◽  
Interval Type

scholarly journals An Integrated Best-Worst and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology for Green Supplier Selection

Mathematics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melih Yucesan ◽  
Suleyman Mete ◽  
Faruk Serin ◽  
Erkan Celik ◽  
Muhammet Gul
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Managerial Implications ◽  
Interval Type

Supplier selection is one of the most important multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems for decision-makers in the competitive market. Today’s organizations are seeking new ways to reduce the negative effects they have on the environment and to achieve a greener system. Currently, the concept of green supplier selection has gained great importance for its ability to incorporate environmental or green criteria into classical supplier selection practices. Therefore, in this study, a multi-phase MCDM model based on the best-worst method (BWM) and the interval type-2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (IT2F TOPSIS) is proposed. A case study in a plastic injection molding facility in Turkey was carried out to show the applicability of the proposed integrated methodology. The paper offers insights into decision-making, methodology, and managerial implications. Results of the case study are examined and suggestions for future research are provided.

scholarly journals An Integrated Best-Worst and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy TOPSIS Methodology for Green Supplier Selection

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melih Yucesan ◽  
Suleyman Mete ◽  
Faruk Serin ◽  
Erkan Celik ◽  
Muhammet Gul
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Managerial Implications ◽  
Interval Type

Supplier selection is one of the most important multi criteria decision making (MCDM) problems for decision makers in competitive market. Organizations of today’s world are seeking new ways to reduce negative effects of their organizations to the environment and to reach a greener system. At this point, green supplier selection concept has gained great importance with its ability on incorporating environmental or green criteria into the classical supplier selection practices. Therefore, in this study, it is aimed at proposing a multi-phase MCDM model based on Best-Worst Method (BWM) and interval type-2 fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). A case study in a plastic injection molding facility in Turkey is performed to show the applicability of the proposed integrated methodology. The paper ensures insights into the decision making, methodology, and managerial implications. Results of the case study are examined and suggestions for future research are provided.

Representing a probabilistic linguistic term set with an interval type-2 fuzzy set and the application in green supplier selection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Le Jiang ◽  
Hongbin Liu
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Membership Function ◽  
Fuzzy Set ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Symbolic Model ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Linguistic Term ◽  
Interval Type ◽  
Decision Making Model

The use of probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) means the process of computing with words. The existing methods computing with PLTSs mainly use symbolic model. To provide a semantic model for computing with PLTSs, we propose to represent a PLTS by using an interval type-2 fuzzy set (IT2FS). The key step is to compute the footprint of uncertainty of the IT2FS. To this aim, the upper membership function is computed by aggregating the membership functions of the linguistic terms contained in the PLTS, and the lower membership function is obtained by moving the upper membership function downward with the step being total entropy of the PLTS. The comparison rules, some operations, and an aggregation operator for PLTSs are introduced. Based on the proposed method of computing with PLTSs, a multi-criteria group decision making model is introduced. The proposed decision making model is then applied in green supplier selection problem to show its feasibility.

Evaluation of Renewable Energy Alternatives using Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP

2015 ◽  
pp. 191-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Başar Öztayşi ◽  
Cengiz Kahraman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Renewable Energy ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Priority Weights ◽  
Interval Type

The selection among renewable energy alternatives is a fuzzy multicriteria problem with many conflicting criteria under uncertainty. In many decision-making problems, the Decision Makers (DM) define their preference in linguistic form since it is relatively difficult to provide exact numerical values during the evaluation of alternatives. Therefore, in many studies, fuzzy logic is successfully used to model this kind of uncertainty. In this chapter, the authors try to capture this uncertainty by using interval type-2 fuzzy sets and hesitant fuzzy sets. They propose a fuzzy multicriteria method for the evaluation of renewable energy alternatives, in which the priority weights of the criteria are determined by interval type-2 fuzzy AHP, and the alternatives are ranked using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS. A case study is also given.

Evaluation of Renewable Energy Alternatives Using Hesitant Fuzzy TOPSIS and Interval Type-2 Fuzzy AHP

2017 ◽  
pp. 1378-1412 ◽  
Author(s):  
Başar Öztayşi ◽  
Cengiz Kahraman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Renewable Energy ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Fuzzy Topsis ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Priority Weights ◽  
Interval Type

The selection among renewable energy alternatives is a fuzzy multicriteria problem with many conflicting criteria under uncertainty. In many decision-making problems, the Decision Makers (DM) define their preference in linguistic form since it is relatively difficult to provide exact numerical values during the evaluation of alternatives. Therefore, in many studies, fuzzy logic is successfully used to model this kind of uncertainty. In this chapter, the authors try to capture this uncertainty by using interval type-2 fuzzy sets and hesitant fuzzy sets. They propose a fuzzy multicriteria method for the evaluation of renewable energy alternatives, in which the priority weights of the criteria are determined by interval type-2 fuzzy AHP, and the alternatives are ranked using hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS. A case study is also given.

scholarly journals A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODOLOGY BASED UPON THE INTERVAL TYPE-2 FUZZY SETS FOR EVALUATING RENEWABLE ENERGY ALTERNATIVES IN TURKEY

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 742-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abit BALIN ◽  
Hayri BARAÇLI
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Renewable Energy ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Alternative Energy ◽  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Primary Energy ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Interval Type

Energy is substantial for social development and has an essential role for the survival and development of human as an environmental factor. Due to the serious increase ofthe world’s primary energy price and rapid development of Turkey’s economy, energy consumption of Turkey has become a major problem. For that purpose, opinions of the decision makers upon the relative importance of selection criteria are determined by using a fuzzy AHP procedure based upon type-2 fuzzy sets, and fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based upon the interval type-2 TOPSIS method is used to rank the best renewable alternative energy. In this paper, a fuzzy multi criteria decision making (MCDM) methodology was proposed to determine the best renewable energy alternatives for Turkey, because type-2 fuzzy sets provide additional degrees of independence to represent the uncertainty and the fuzziness of real world applications. The results showed that wind was the best alternative for Turkey’s energy investments, as being followed subsequently by solar, biomass, geothermal, hydraulic and hydrogen. The results were based upon the opinions of three energy planning experts who ranked the energy alternatives according to the ten criteria we have selected.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document