5.2. Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Fingerstick Blood Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancy Outcome of Gestational Diabetes (2692-PO)

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-93
Author(s):  
Gui Feng Ding
Keyword(s):  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Blood Glucose Monitoring ◽  
In Pregnancy

scholarly journals Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19: Results of an Emergent Pilot Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 1065-1073
Author(s):  
Archana R. Sadhu ◽  
Ivan Alexander Serrano ◽  
Jiaqiong Xu ◽  
Tariq Nisar ◽  
Jessica Lucier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Insulin Therapy ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Continuous Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Blood Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Target Range

Background: Amidst the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has emerged as an alternative for inpatient point-of-care blood glucose (POC-BG) monitoring. We performed a feasibility pilot study using CGM in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Single-center, retrospective study of glucose monitoring in critically ill patients with COVID-19 on insulin therapy using Medtronic Guardian Connect and Dexcom G6 CGM systems. Primary outcomes were feasibility and accuracy for trending POC-BG. Secondary outcomes included reliability and nurse acceptance. Sensor glucose (SG) was used for trends between POC-BG with nursing guidance to reduce POC-BG frequency from one to two hours to four hours when the SG was in the target range. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD), Clarke error grids analysis (EGA), and Bland-Altman (B&A) plots were calculated for accuracy of paired SG and POC-BG measurements. Results: CGM devices were placed on 11 patients: Medtronic ( n = 6) and Dexcom G6 ( n = 5). Both systems were feasible and reliable with good nurse acceptance. To determine accuracy, 437 paired SG and POC-BG readings were analyzed. For Medtronic, the MARD was 13.1% with 100% of readings in zones A and B on Clarke EGA. For Dexcom, MARD was 11.1% with 98% of readings in zones A and B. B&A plots had a mean bias of −17.76 mg/dL (Medtronic) and −1.94 mg/dL (Dexcom), with wide 95% limits of agreement. Conclusions: During the COVID-19 pandemic, CGM is feasible in critically ill patients and has acceptable accuracy to identify trends and guide intermittent blood glucose monitoring with insulin therapy.

scholarly journals Evaluation of information retention and adherence to treatment in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus after multidisciplinary group

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Maria da Silva Sousa ◽  
Daine Fiuza ◽  
Fernanda Cristina Ferreira Mikami ◽  
Karen Cristine Abrão ◽  
Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Blood Glucose ◽  
Gestational Diabetes ◽  
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Diabetes Management ◽  
Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Blood Glucose Monitoring ◽  
Contact Method ◽  
Information Retention ◽  
Multidisciplinary Group

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the retention of information after participation in multidisciplinary group in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) through a phone contact. Method: 122 pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes were included. After diagnosis of gestational diabetes, the patients were referred to the multidisciplinary group where they received medical, nutrition and nursing guidelines related to the disease. After three days these patients received one telephone call from a nurse, who made the same questions regarding the information received. In the statistical analysis, results were presented as absolute and relative frequencies. Results: Most patients 119/122 patients (97.5%) were managing to do self glucose monitoring. Twenty-one patients (17.2%) reported having difficulty performing the blood glucose, especially finger pricking. When questioning whether the woman was following the proposed diet, 24/122 (19.7%) patients said they did not; the meal frequency was not reached by 23/122 (18.9%) of the women, and forty-seven (38.5%) of the women reported having ingested sugar in the days following the guidance in multidisciplinary group. Conclusion: Regarding the proposed treatment, there was good adherence of patients, especially in relation to blood glucose monitoring. As for nutritional control, we observed greater difficulty in following the guidelines demonstrating the need for long-term monitoring, as well as further clarification to the patients about the importance of nutrition in diabetes management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document